I’ve posted something on this over on my Threads blog, titled Does Gordon Fee Discard Part of the Bible?. That post is a response to part of a interview with Wayne Grudem by Adrian Warnock.
I think it will be of interest to readers of this blog for the textual criticism aspects, though less so for the controversial theological aspects.
There has been a good deal of talk in the biblioblogosphere about translation theory, and in connection with that support for the REB. In particular, I would note John Hobbins post Why the REB is a Great Translation, and to his earlier posts (not directly on the REB but very relevant to this post), You…
It looks like pretty much the same article I referenced earlier (I didn’t take the time to compare them word by word, but many of the quotes match. The only reason I’m referencing this separately is the headline: The battle for truth in Bible translation. Is it possible that anyone thinks the project really is…
With a recent flurry of posts regarding the way in which the Old Testament is used in the New, at least peripherally, I wanted to call attention to one written from a different perspective. The post is Isaiah 7, Nativity, and the Theotokos, written by Mark Olson, who speaks from an Orthodox perspective. He discusses…
I wanted to write a quick note here as this relates to my study tonight, as well as illustrating quite a number of translation problems. Here is our text, with CEV (NOT CEB) to the left, NRSV in the center as a “literal” comparison, and NLT to the right. I’m copying the NRSV notes as…
I did my lectionary reading today from the Complete Jewish Bible. Each day I read two sets of lectionary texts, one from the current week, and one from the week following. I try to choose a different version each day, and also read them at least once from the original languages. This week’s epistles passage…
The ISV whole Bible is available in electronic form. It’s a sort of pre-release, with a module available for eSword, along with Word 2003 and 2010 docs. I now have the whole Bible, even though corrections may be made before printing, so I’m planning to check my key verses and make up my numbers to…
Comments are closed.
PERHAPS THAT SINCE IT IS BELIEVED THAT FEMALES
TALK A LOT AND TALK TOO MUCH, THAT THIS SCRIPTURE
IN 1-CORINTHIANS COULD MEAN FOR WOMEN TO BE
QUITE IN CHURCH BACK THEN SO THAT THEY WOULD NOT
INTERUPPT THE CHURCH SERVICE!
BECAUSE ONCE WOMEN START TALKING SOMETIMES
THEY SEEM NOT TO STOP TALKING FOR A WHILE!!
SO MAYBE THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BACK THEN
WAIT UNTI THEY GET HOME TO SPEAK AND ASK
QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CHURCH SERVICE THEY
ATTENDED!! AND ABOUT THE SCRIPTURES!!
BECAUSE WHO WANTS A WOMAN BRAWLING IN THE CHURCH!!
OR GETTING ALL UPSET OR EMOTIONAL!!
OR ASKING SO MANY QUESTIONS IN THE CHURCH
SERVICE THAT IT TURNS A TWO HOUR CHURCH SERVICE
INTO A (4) OR (5) HOUR CHURCH SERVICE!!
FROM: BIG MOUTH FOR GOD———————————
Big Mouth: And then again you might be totally wrong, and God may not appreciate it that you claim to speak for him while putting down women.
You might think about that.