Some Dialogue on Inerrancy
. . . via if i were a bell, i’d ring. Check it out and the links.
Similar Posts
Response to Misquoting Jesus – Ia
Byhenry
I wanted to follow up briefly on my first post on Misquoting Jesus to provide a quotation and make a couple more comments on inspiration. The quotation comes from page 13: It is a radical shift from reading the Bible as an inerrant blueprint for our faith, life, and future to seeing it as a…
The Most Annoying Theologian I’ve Never Read
Byhenry
. . . is Wayne Grudem. Well, not quite true. The most annoying theologian is Peter Ruckman of the Pensacola Bible Institute, and I have read some of his stuff. I’ve also read articles by Grudem, and I wouldn’t come close to excluding him from Christianity, so I guess I have read him and he’s…
Reading Part 6 (On Inerrancy)
Byhenry
I somehow got the idea that the inerrancy series to which I linked yesterday was in five parts. A comment from the author let me know that I was wrong on that point, and how I got the idea I do not know, consider that the statement “*Part 6 will conclude with reflections on why…
Dave Warnock on Wayne Grudem Interview
Byhenry
Dave Warnock has posted an excellent set of reflections on the Wayne Grudem interview series. I strongly recommend reading it, especially some specific reflections from a Methodist perspective. While I do not use the term “evangelical” and Dave does, the problem is a difference of definition. Some of us try to hang onto words and…
Just What the Bible Says
Byhenry
More than a year ago I wrote a post titled Just Your Interpretation. In it I challenge the idea that just any interpretation will do, and suggested that there are right and wrong interpretations, and we should aim for right interpretations. I know this goes contrary to the post-modern trend. But I also mentioned another…
March Abnormally Interesting Biblical Studies Carnival Posted
Byhenry
… at — you guessed it — Abnormal Interests!
One Comment
Comments are closed.
Thanks for the link!