N. T. Wright on Genesis 1-3
Some excellent thoughts at the BioLogos Foundation blog Science and the Sacred.
Similar Posts
The Need for my Series on Interpreting the Bible
Byhenry… amongst many other things. As I’m preparing to move forward in this series, which covers only one small area, I find this post from the generally enlightening Jason Rosenhouse, who lauds simplistic arguments in putting down other simplistic arguments. He approvingly quotes Coyne: Unfortunately, some theologians with a deistic bent seem to think that…
Worship that Builds
ByhenryPeter Kirk has a post on one of my favorite topics, order in worship, titled God is not a God of disorder but of peace. I want to call attention to a couple of points in his post. First, on the context of the passage from which his title was taken, he says: It seems…
- Bible Study | Christianity | Humor | Religion
What the Greek REALLY Says!
ByhenryThis was so good I had to embed it!
Christian Carnival CCLXI Posted
Byhenry… at The Ignorant Historian. There’s some good stuff in there. I also remind folks of the new archive I’m maintaining here.
Coolness and Complacency
ByhenryOK, I’m going to try for three short notes at a time. In this case I’m helped by Dave Warnock, who already wrote on the topic. It seems that Adrian Warnock doesn’t like people to be “cool-headed” about the atonement. He says: To be honest, when I heard this book was going to be cool-headed…
Inerrancy – Romancing the Term
ByhenryI’ve previously expressed my surprise about what some people can believe about the Bible and yet call their belief “inerrancy.” As an example, I responded to Earnest Lucas’s excellent commentary on Daniel in which he maintains that one can hold both inerrancy and a late dating of Daniel. I think a good one sentence summary…