The Bible and Abortion
John Hobbins is off to a promising start discussing what the Bible says about abortion. I’ll be interested in seeing his take on Exodus 21:22-25, and may post some thoughts of my own when the time comes.
John Hobbins is off to a promising start discussing what the Bible says about abortion. I’ll be interested in seeing his take on Exodus 21:22-25, and may post some thoughts of my own when the time comes.
Michael Patton, who often steps into controversial issues (which I do not mean as a criticism), asks why people love C. S. Lewis, but hate Rob Bell. His conclusion is that this is because Bell’s ideas that push the boundaries characterize his ministry, unlike those of C. S. Lewis. I must admit that I’ve read…
I have had very little time to post on Leviticus over the last few weeks because of my business, in which I’ve been working on three books simultaneously. But Leviticus has not been very far from my mind. The more I read Leviticus, the more I like it. I’ve read through it with a variety…
Since I blogged two days ago about my opposition to certain phraseology used by Rev. Jim Wallis, I want to say something about the quote to which he is responding. I find the “death boards” complaint about health care easily the least well-founded and most damaging of the issues. There is good reason to discuss…
As a follow-up to my notes on God’s Problem, I would like to comment briefly on how a diversity of explanations do coexist, and how they might justifiably do so. First, despite our best efforts to find logical explanations, in general people use case by case explanations pretty readily. They may believe that one person…
This past week on the Energion Discussion Network two answers were posted to the question “Can the great religions be vehicles of salvation for their followers?” Answering “Yes” was Dr. Herold Weiss, and answering “No” was Dr. H. Van Dyke Parunak. Both are authors published by my company, Energion Publications. I enjoyed reading the responses…
Update: Please read through to the comments. Both Jeremy Pierce and Joe Carter believe I have misread them, though Joe graciously took responsibility for lack of clarity. If I am now reading him correctly, I agree with his points as made in that comment. One day back when I was a junior NCO in the…
Here’s my treatment of the Exodus passage:
http://ancienthebrewpoetry.typepad.com/ancient_hebrew_poetry/2011/01/under-what-circumstances-abortion-is-permitted-in-jewish-tradition.html#more
I discuss it in light of the text’s impact and trajectory in Jewish tradition.
Another approach would be discuss it against the background of ANE analogues. The Hittite laws vary the monetary compensation based on the gestational age of the fetus. The legal consequences of causing a woman to miscarry if the woman dies are variations on the principle of lex talionis in the Code of Hammurabi and the middle Assyrian laws. If the pregnant woman who dies belonged to the upper class, her assailant’s daughter was put to death – an example of vicarious punishment. The Middle Assyrians even prescribe torture of the guilty side. Only the oldest laws, the Sumerian laws, make a distinction between accidental and intentional assault.
You covered what I would have (the ancient background), and I agree with your summary, and then you covered a bunch more. There’s nothing for me to add!