|

Inane Comments in the Orthodox Study Bible

I’ve complained previously about the translation used in the Orthodox Study Bible, but I reserved discussion of the notes for later.

Before I complain, however, I want to note that I have found quite a number of comments that I regard as helpful. My study has been enriched by using this Bible.  At the same time, I am frustrated by the number of cases in which it could be so much more enriching than it is.

So herewith a small and perhaps nitpicky complaint–notes that actually add nothing to the text.

I was reading 2 Samuel 7:1-11 for my lectionary study, and checked the notes.  The passage is the story of how David finds himself living in a house of cedar, but God’s house is a tent, so he wants to build a temple.

The note on verses 1-3 reads:

David has united the tribes under his kingship, established Jerusalem as his capital, and lives in a house paneled with cedar.  The ark, though now brought up to the city, remains in the taernacle he pitched for it, a tent.  He seeks advice from Nathan the prophet, who instructs him to build a temple for the ark.

Umm, wasn’t that approximately what the text just said?  The only thing added is where the capital is.  The next note begins:

In a dream, God informs Nathan . . .

And you guessed it, we get the next several verses summarized.

There is much that this Bible does, but so much more that would be possible.  The notes are quite variable, ranging from profound, especially when they bring the eastern church fathers into the mix, all the way to completely inane such as these two.

Similar Posts

4 Comments

  1. It’s a great idea to compare verses in several different translations. It’s very easy to do this using Bible software.
    Full disclosure: My husband works for Logos Bible Software so I am a little prejudiced…
    If you want to take your Bible study to the next level, take a look and give him a call and he would love to offer you a discounted price!
    Jared Bryant (800) 875-6467 ext 2319

  2. Alot of people have mixed feelings about the OSB, and we all like it or dislike it for different reasons.

    I’m not upset for I know that this isn’t the final product. The next edition should be an improvement on this one. But it takes money and time to do stuff like this. Most of the people that put this together wasn’t paid. They did this for free. And they had to take the time out of their bizzy lives to do it.

    I see this as a work of Love that will eventually reach perfection.

    JNORM888

    1. I get your point, sort of. But I think the publisher/editors could have done better. There are things to appreciate in the volume, it’s just a disappointment to me overall.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *