|

From YEC to Theistic Evolutionist

Since I’ve made this journey myself, I’m always on the alert for other stories of similar journeys. It’s interesting that I’ve found many more such stories amongst those studying science. On the religion side, it’s generally those who studies nuts and bolts material (textual criticism, history, archeology, and so forth) who start to see holes in the fabric of a literalist view of the Bible.

Dr. Steve Matheson has an interesting post at Quintessence of Dust on this very topic, discussing the story of paleontologist Stephen Godfrey, as told in an article in Science. It’s worth reading Dr. Matheson’s summary even though the article is available only to subscribers.

In these discussions by scientists I frequently see discussions of the need to prepare a theological framework to help people migrate their faith along with their science. I personally found this very difficult coming up as a Seventh-day Adventist. I ended up leaving the church entirely for a period of 12 years, before finding my own balance. There are a couple of problems. For many conservative Christians, any alteration in one’s view of the Bible is apostasy, and thus there is little room for adjustment. The view has to be shattered and then rebuilt. There are some careful theologians and specialists in Biblical studies who also have an interest in the people they teach who can help with this, but they are few and far between. On the other hand, there is too much of a tendency in those who make the journey to laugh at those who have not and expect them to jump. This is combined with a tendency to minimize the gap involved. I personally often have trouble expressing the differences in interpretation without sounding impatient and condescending, so I understand the difficulty. At the same time I know I’m speaking against positions I once held myself with some fervor!

“Just don’t take it so literally” becomes the mantra. But “not taking it so literally” is not an adequate foundation. Just how do you take it? What does the Bible mean in a new context? Besides the problem of oversimplification there is a difference in terms of theology. There is not a single Christian theology to which one can appeal in this case. In particular dealing with issues like randomness and teleology, Arminians and Calvinists tend to see things very differently.

I’d add one more thing. Because of my writing (on religion, not science), in which I state my positions, I was never able to conceal the change from my family, most of whom are still young earth creationists. That is probably the hardest single thing for them to accept about my faith as it now stands. It’s a good idea to understand that this is a significant issue. At the same time, I’m not going to keep quiet, simply because I know many are afraid to speak up because they feel that there are so few who will understand. It’s important to be present and accounted for!

In any case, I’m glad to see the discussion going on.

Similar Posts

3 Comments

  1. Thanks for posting this, Henry! I’ve taken the same journey from YEC to theistic evolutionist, and, though I never left the church, I have experienced a lot of what you describe. My slow enlightenment (some would say, compromise!) came from both ends: formal training in biblical studies, and a strong lay interest in science steadily eroded my views. Blogging has also opened by eyes to a lot of perspectives that I would not have otherwise encountered.

    Unfortunately, I’ve also got the added frustration of being a “contributing editor” for a magazine (Salvo) that embraces ID wholeheartedly (indeed, the first article I wrote for them was supportive of ID), while I myself have steadily grown disillusioned with that movement. The tension between alienating my friends, and responding to falsehood, is not one I have yet resolved, which is why I don’t write much on the subject anymore…

    Thanks for the encouragement, anyway!

  2. Thanks for your honesty. This is one of several core areas I’ve learned to keep quiet about because they label me as “divisive” in my congregation. Can you guess what the others are? 🙂

Comments are closed.