Easter Sunday 2004

Easter Sunday offers us an opportunity to meditate on the joy hope of restoration and renewal.  Not only do we celebrate the resurrection of Jesus in the past (John 20:1-18, Luke 24:1-12), and look forward to the resurrection in the future (1 Corinthians 15:19-26), but we can also celebrate the current renewal of salvation in the form of redemption from difficult circumstances (Psalm 118:1-2, 14-24) and also in the form of inclusion replacing exclusion (Acts 10:34-43).  It is very easy for us to get busy on either side of this divide, to focus just on the historical foundation for our faith to the exclusion of its day to day meaning, or on the other hand to look just at some metaphorical meanings and miss out of the deeper and broader hope expressed in these passages.  In either case we will find diminished joy.  This theme will work particularly well if you use all four scriptures in your liturgy.

 

 

Special teaching opportunity:

 

The two alternative descriptions of the resurrection (John 20:1-18; Luke 24:1-12) suggest the possibility of looking at some of the critical methodologies involved in the historical study of these texts with your congregation.  You can add to this list Matthew 28:1-10 and Mark 16:1-8.  If you have a good gospel parallel, such as Aland?s Synopsis Quattuor Evangeliorum (English text:  Synopsis of the Four Gospels) [see my tool notes] or Throckmorton?s Gospel Parallels:  NRSV Edition [see my tool notes].

 

In addition, Energion Publications has available a list of resources and some pamphlets that can be used as note handouts when studying this material: (will open in a blank window so you don’t lose this page.)

 

What is Biblical Criticism? 

Form and Genre Criticism (Coming Soon)

Redaction and Tradition Criticism (Coming Soon)

Source Criticism (Coming Soon)

Literary and Canonical Criticism (Coming Soon)

Understanding the Search for the Historical Jesus

 

There are two things to be avoided here, in my view.  First, we do not want to focus our efforts on trying to make the accounts appear identical.  Harmonization is the result of a historical focus that avoids noticing the rich tradition that is behind the variety of materials that we have.  Second, we need to avoid acting as though these accounts are completely fragmented.  They are not.  There are specific reasons why various accounts differ.  Some questions you can explore with your congregation in a teaching environment (this doesn?t make good sermon material).  What are the reasons for the different accounts?  (Reports of different witnesses?  Development of tradition?  Author license and focus in each case?  Different authors interested in different things?)  What do these differences tell us about the early church and the way in which our scriptural materials were preserved?

 

 

Isaiah 65:17-25

 

This passage presents a picture of the Messianic age.  There is often confusion in our understanding of these passages because as Christians, we have divided the Old Testament concept of the Messianic age into the two advents.  At the first Advent Jesus deals with sin and proclaims the kingdom.  At the second advent he is to bring to fruition what he planted that first time.  I have pointed out some of the things in this passage that we might not understand as a ?new earth? situation.  The theme of recreation is more important than your particular eschatology in hearing the message of this passage.

 

For some notes on Old Testament prophecy and its application to the mission of Jesus see Who?s Afraid of the Old Testament God? available from Energion Publications.  For a careful evangelical view of Isaiah, see Herbert W. Wolf Interpreting Isaiah:  The Suffering and Glory of the Messiah.  Probably the strongest commentary on Isaiah I?ve read recently, however, is Brevard Childs Isaiah in the Old Testament Library.

 

Translation

Notes

(17) Look!  I am creating new heavens and a new earth,

And the former things will not be remembered, nor will they come into mind.

(18) So be glad and rejoice forever about that which I am creating

For behold I am creating Jerusalem as rejoicing and its people as a delight.

 

 

(19) And I will rejoice in Jerusalem and I will be delighted in my people

No longer will the voice of weeping and of crying out be heard in it.

(20) There will no longer be there a child who dies in infancy,

or an elderly person who hasn’t fulfilled his days,

Because when someone dies at a hundred years old he?ll be considered young,

And anyone who dies at less than a hundred years will be considered cursed.

 

(21) They will build houses and live in them,

They will plant vineyards and eat their fruit.

(22) They will not build and another live there,

They will not plant and another eat,

For as the days of a tree will be the days of my people

and my chosen ones will long enjoy the work of their hands.

(23) They will not labor in vain or bear children for terror,

because they will be seed of those blessed by YHWH,

and their offspring with them.

(24) And it will happen that before they call I will answer,

While they are still speaking I will hear.

(25) The wolf and the lamb will graze together as one,

and the lion and ox will eat straw,

and as for the snake, dust will be his food.

They will not hurt nor will they destroy in all my holy mountain.

YHWH has spoken.

I am creating ? Hebrew bara? which refers only to activity of God and to the production of something new or unique.  It does not exclude, as is sometimes taught, creation from preexisting material.  Such an interpretation here would be more radical than is intended.  The same word occurs three times in quick succession in verses 17 and 18.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note that this is not the eschatological age or spiritual ?life after death? in which everyone is immortal, but is rather an age in which there is still ordinary death, but in which life is both freed from tragedy and extended.

 

Instead of the Biblical 70 years as a good lifetime we have 100 years considered young.

 

The ordinary labors go on, but are fruitful.

 

 

 

Again, not immortality, but long life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is the promise that prayer and worship will be successful.

 

We are presented with God?s holy mountain as a garden, and with allusions such as the serpent eating dust, our attention is drawn to the garden of Eden.  In one sense we have a new thing; in another, the renewal of an old one.

 

We should be extremely careful in applying this material to the earth after the second coming of Christ.  That application is drawn from Revelation which makes significant verbal allusions to this passage, but this passage is clearly not speaking of immortality or of ?heaven? as we conceive of it as Christians.

 

 

Psalm 118:1-2, 14-24

 

The focus of this particular selection of verses is praising God for his graciousness in restoring one after great danger or sickness.  It is a celebration of victory.  This ties closely with the resurrection both in celebration of overcoming great adversity, in victory over sin.  While there are certainly parallels, there is also the note that ?YHWH had severely disciplined? the psalmist, which does not apply to the normal Easter message.  But this is an excellent application of the Easter message to daily life.

 

Translation

Notes

(1) Praise YHWH for he is good,

for his graciousness is eternal.

(2) Let Israel now say, “His graciousness is eternal.”

(14) My strength and ability was YH(WH),

So he was my salvation.

(15) The sound of singing and salvation is in the tents of the victors.

The right hand of YHWH achieved victory.

(16) The right hand of YHWH was exalted,

The right hand of YHWH achieved victory.

 

 

 

 

(17) I shall not die, but live,

so I can recount the deeds of YH(WH)

(18) YH(WH) has severely disciplined me,

he did not hand me over to death.

(19) Open to me, gates of victory,

I will enter them and I will praise YH(WH).

(20) This is the gate for YHWH,

Let those who are victorious enter it.

(21) I will praise you because you answered me,

And you became my savior.

(22) The stone that the builders rejected

Has become the key cornerstone.

(23) This is something that comes from YHWH,

It is marvelous in our eyes.

(24) This is the day that YHWH has made,

Let’s rejoice and be glad in him.

 

 

 

 

YHWH was the one who gave strength

 

 

Victors ? perhaps overcomers.  I took this Translation from Dahood (AB: Psalms III), but having read the text I think there is a clear case for including victorious and perhaps efficacious deeds as well as correct deeds in the semantic range of Hebrew tsedek.

 

 

There is always a purpose beyond the obvious in the deeds of YHWH.  In this case, while the purpose of the psalmist is clearly his own victory, God has in mind the testimony he will give to God?s acts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Often God uses things that we humans reject.  In our weakness he is strong.  In the case of Easter?in death Jesus was rejected, his mission finished and a failure.  In the resurrection he proves triumphant.  The rejected stone becomes the head.

 

 

1 Corinthians 15:19-26

 

This passage is part of Paul?s major statement on the resurrection.  The key to understanding what Paul is saying here about resurrection is the overall theme of 1 Corinthians.  (I strongly recommend Gordon Fee?s commentary The First Epistle to the Corinthians in the New International Commentary on the New Testament.  Also, check my radio series on 1 Corinthians, now available on CD.)  While this passage is normally quoted in support of the bodily resurrection of Jesus, it has quite a different focus.

 

Paul is concerned in 1 Corinthians with the nature of being truly spiritual.  He joins body and spirit, i.e. we cannot ignore the body in favor of the spirit.  We haven?t moved on to a new and higher state where the body will not matter.  In fact, we will never move on to such a state, because there will be a spiritual body.  Paul?s focus in 1 Corinthians 15 is on the time when we actually attain spiritual completeness, and that is in a spiritual body.  So we don?t get away from bodies even in the end, but we also can never say we have spiritually attained short of the time when we do receive that spiritual body.

 

In support of this resurrection hope?a bodily resurrection indeed, even though it is a body transformed into another category of bodies?Paul is citing the basic teaching of Christianity which is the resurrection.  And indeed he is teaching a bodily resurrection, again, a body transformed into another category.  Paul?s argument is certainly neither to suggest that there was no body at all involved in the resurrection of Jesus, but rather that the earthly thing that was planted was transformed, as much and possibly more so than a plant is transformed from the seed that produces it.  This immediately denies either the idea that the very molecules of your current body are important to your resurrection body?cremation doesn?t bother God!?or the idea that there is no body and no connection between your present and what you do with your present body and your future.  What you are now is the seed of what you will become, transformed by God?s resurrection power.

 

We can proclaim a true resurrection which is both real and bodily, and at the same time is a spiritual transformation rather than the crude animation of a corpse.  (Some paint the doctrine of the bodily resurrection of Jesus as just such a crude reanimation.  It was more than that, not less.)  Jesus could interact with disciples in a physical way even though the stories indicate that body behaved differently.  The seed of the old body was planted and transformed into the new spiritual body.

 

To get the feel of this, read all of 1 Corinthians 15 to see the connection between spirituality, the basic affirmation of the resurrection and the eschatological transformation of the body.  Even better, read the entire book and see the different ways in with the Corinthian believes tried get the spiritual separated from the body and to claim spiritual superiority here and now.  Paul bats down each of these attempts in sequence.  The fifteenth chapter is the climax.

 

 

Translation

Notes

(19) If it is for this life only that we have placed our hope in Christ, we are more to be pitied than all humanity.

 

(20) But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruit of those who have died.  (21) For since through a human being death came, resurrection of the dead also came through a human being.  (22) For in the same way that in Adam all die in Christ all will be made alive.  (23) But each in his own sequence, first Christ, then those who belong to Christ at his appearance, (24) then the end, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, when he tears down every power and every authority and source of strength.  (25) For it is necessary for him to reign until he puts every enemy under his feet.  (26) The last enemy to be rendered powerless is death.

 

 

 

 

 

 

An interesting note on the human side of Jesus mission.  A human being had to accomplish certain things for our salvation and reconciliation to God.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

According to Paul, the defeat of death is not complete until the victory of Easter is applied to all at the end of time

 

 

Acts 10:34-43

 

This passage combines the proclamation of the resurrection with the universality of the message.  The incarnation is by nature a message of reconciliation in that God, as separated from us as possible, showed that he was also as close to us as was possible (see notes).

 

Translation

Notes

(34)  Then Peter began to speak, “I now really understand that God does not show partiality,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(35) but in all nations those who fear him and do righteous deeds are acceptable to him.  (36) The message he sent to the children of Israel, proclaiming the good news of peace through Jesus Christ is that Jesus is Lord of everyone.  (37) You yourselves know the word that went through all Judea, starting from Galilee after the Baptism that John proclaimed. (38) Jesus from Nazareth, as God anointed him with the Holy Spirit and power went all around doing good deeds and healing everyone who was being oppressed by the devil, because God was with him.  (39) And we are witnesses of everything that he did in the country of Judea and in Jerusalem.

 

 

 

 

 

This was the one whom they also destroyed, hanging him on a tree (40) and God raised on the third day and made him visible,

 

 

 

 

(41) not to all the people but to witnesses appointed beforehand by God,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

to us who ate with him and drank with him after he was raised from the dead.

 

 

 

 

  (42) And he instructed us to proclaim to the people and to bear witness that he is the one who was foreordained by God as judge of the living and the dead.  (43) All the prophets bore witness to this one that everyone who believes in him might receive forgiveness of sins through his name.

Partiality was a common understanding of what it meant that God had chosen the Jewish people as ?his? people.  In fact, starting with the original call to Abraham, there is a key element of enlightening the nations.  This element starts in Genesis 12:3 ?all nations being blessed in/through Abraham? and is carried through the prophetic tradition (Isaiah 42 and 51, for example).  The Jewish people were chosen to serve God in a special way and to show God?s righteousness to the world.

 

Here Peter is getting the idea that God finds people other than Jews acceptable to him, something that was really implicit in Judaism.

 

 

 

 

 

This was the life mission of Jesus.

 

 

 

Peter is focusing on the witness.  He was a witness to what Jesus had done.  Often we as Christians try to be witnesses without having anything to witness.  God has to take action in our lives before we can bear witness to such action.  Simply repeated someone else?s story isn?t adequate.  We need to add to the story.

 

The witness of Jesus is not complete without his life, his death and his resurrection together.  A focus on the passion on its own is not balanced.  Jesus lived and taught as a man, he was killed as a man, and then he was raised from the dead.

 

Again the focus on witness.  While we do not have available any eyewitness to the story, we can each experience the spiritual reality of the risen Jesus.  If we do not, we cannot really call ourselves ?witnesses? in the sense that term is used in scripture.  Paul, for example, was a spiritual witness who encountered Jesus after the fact and in a vision.  He could testify to the impact of the risen Christ.

 

I believe there are two unbalanced views of the resurrection.  One holds that the resurrection is not a historical experience, but only a spiritual experience?history doesn?t matter.  The other holds that the real key is solely the historical events are the sole interest, and that what we have now is just a technical result of believing in a set of facts.  I would suggest that the balance is a combination of both.

 

Another focus as in 1 Corinthians 15 on the bodily nature.  Note here that Jesus can still relate to those who live in the finite universe; he is still like us, even though he is portrayed as having new and different powers.

 

This is the proclamation.  To complete the atonement or reconciliation, the acts of Jesus must be proclaimed.  When we understand that God can cross any barrier, including that from infinity to something finite, we understand that other differences can be reconciled as well, that God is, indeed, impartial (2 Corinthians 5:18-21).

 

 

John 20:1-18

 

The common theme of the empty tomb narratives is that the women are first to the tomb, and that they find the tomb empty.  Otherwise the chronology is definitely difficult to reconcile, as well as the number and names of the various visitors.  A number of attempts have been made to build a chronology that reconciles all the evidence.  Examples include John Wenham ?Easter Enigma? (cited in Leon Morris, ?The Gospel According to John).  Perhaps we would be better off saying with Barclay (The Gospel of Luke, P. 292 & 293) ?No two people ever described the same episode in the same terms; nothing so wonderful as the resurrection ever escaped a certain embroidery as it was repeatedly told and retold.  But at the heart of this story that all-important fact of the empty tomb remains.?

 

Special mention commentary:  Leon Morris The Gospel According to John (Revised).

This scholarly level commentary keeps the most technical information in the notes which makes the basic text easy to use for pastors without strong Biblical language skills.  It is evangelical, but takes serious note of critical issues.

 

Translation

Notes

(1) Now on the first day of the week early in the morning while it was still dark Mary Magdalene came to the tomb and she saw the stone removed from the tomb.  (2) Then she ran and came to Simon Peter and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved and she said to them, “They have taken the Lord from the tomb and we don’t know where they have put him.?  (3) Then Peter and the other disciple went out and came to the tomb.  (4) Now the two of them ran together, but the other disciple ran more quickly than Peter and he came first to the tomb, (5) and he stooped down and saw the grave clothes lying there, but he didn’t go in. (6) Then Simon Peter came as well following him and he went into the tomb and he saw the grave clothes lying, (7) and the face cloth, which was upon his head was not lying with the grave clothes but separately would up in one place.  (8) So then he went out and the other disciple who came first into the tomb also saw and he believed.  (9) for they did not yet know the scripture that he must rise from the dead.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10) Then the disciples went home again.

 

 

 

 

(11) But Mary stood by the tomb outside weeping.  Then as she was crying, she bent down into the tomb (12) and she saw two angels in white clothing sitting one at the head and one at the feet where the body of Jesus had lain. (13) And they said to her, “Woman, why are you crying?”  She says to them, “They have taken my Lord away and I don’t know where they have placed him.”  (14) When she had said these things she turned around and saw Jesus standing but she didn’t know it was Jesus.  (15) Jesus said to her, “Woman, why are you crying?  Who are you looking for?”  Now she, thinking he was the gardener, said to him, “Sir, if you have taken him, tell me whether you have put him, and I will take him away.”  (16) Jesus said to her, “Mary!”  Then she turned and said to him in Aramaic, “Rabbouni” (which means “teacher”).  (17) Jesus said to her, “Don’t keep grabbing me, for I have not yet gone to my father.  Now go to my brothers and tell them, “I am going to my father and your father and my God and your God.?

 

 

 

 

(18) Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the Lord and that he had said these things to her.

Mary is surprised and doesn?t know what to do.  Her reaction is to get others so they can figure it out.  The concern is not to find Jesus.  Nobody at this point in the story thinks he is alive.  Rather, the concern is what is happening to the body.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The key to the story in John, both here and elsewhere is the process of coming to belief.  The indication here is that the resurrection was unexpected, that the disciples and the various women coming to the tomb had not any prior idea that such a thing was predicted in scripture.  Thus the belief in the resurrection comes first (Leon Morris, The Gospel of John), and the prophetic data that fill out that belief come later.

 

The disciples don?t know anything else to do so they go home, but Mary isn?t satisfied.  As far as we can tell, only the ?beloved disciple? has come to faith at this point.

 

Mary can?t let go and so she hangs around looking for answers.  There is something wonderful about the beloved disciple just believing, but there is also something good about Mary unwilling to let go and looking for answers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One of the key elements of meetings with the risen Jesus is that he is not generally recognized when he first appears.  There are reactions of fear and confusion.

 

Jesus has his own necessary agenda and will not hang around.  While he can still interact, the relationship will never be the same.  He let?s Mary know here that he is going to be leaving again.

 

Something that will be a feature of Christianity ever afterward comes into play here?belief on the basis of the witness of others.  Mary tells the disciples what had happened, but they will take some time to understand the experience for themselves.

 

 

Luke 24:1-12

 

Note that other than the early morning experience of the empty tomb the stories of John and the other gospels share nothing in common (Leon Morris, John).  In Luke we have an early explanation from the angels, but no actual appearance of Jesus within this pericope.  Again, the key is fear and surprise resulting in confusion.  Only slowly do the disciples and other followers come to understand.

 

Special mention commentary:  William Barclay The Gospel of Luke.  This is an excellent devotional level commentary with some coverage of technical issues.  It is very helpful in sermon preparation with plenty of ideas for application.

 

Translation

Notes

(1) Now on the first day of the week, very early in the morning they came to the tomb carrying the spices that had been prepared.  (2) And they found the stone rolled away from the tomb, (3) and when they had gone in they didn’t find the body of the Lord Jesus.  (4) And it happened as they were in doubt concerning this two men appeared in shining garments.  (5) And they became very afraid and bowed till their faces touched the ground, and they said to them, “Why do you seek the living with the dead. (6) He is not here, but he has risen.  Remember how he spoke to you while you were still in Galilee (7) saying that the son of man must be handed over into the hands of sinful humans and be crucified and on the third day he will rise again.  (8) And they remembered his words.  (9) And they returned from the tomb and told all these things to the eleven and to all those who remained.  (10) There were Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary the mother of James and the rest with them.  They told these things to the apostles (11) and these words appeared before them as idle talk, and they didn’t believe them.  (12) But Peter rose up and ran to the tomb and he bent down and saw the grave clothes alone, and he went marveling to himself at what had happened.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note that Luke refers back to the words of Jesus, while John looks back to the prophecies of the Old Testament.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter?s interest is aroused first here, as well as in John.  Perhaps this is another commonality, not noticed by Morris.

 

 

Some regular tools I use in preparing these notes:

 

Libronix Digital Library System with the Scholar?s Library

I love this superb collection of resources with excellent tools.  I?ve added the Biblical Languages add-in.  Overall this is an expensive system, though one can start at a much lower price with the Home Library for a much lower price.

 

Oxford Study Bible (REB with the Apocrypha)

This is my favorite English version, and I also consult its articles and notes.  See my review.

 

Biblical Hebrew Syntax

This is an excellent reference work as well as guide to the advanced study of Biblical Hebrew syntax.

 

I will include other works with links in future lectionary pages.  A very selected bibliography is contained on the lectionary index page.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *