Eschatology: They Remembered Him

9781938434105sI had hoped to do a bit more writing on how we interpret the Bible before tonight’s discussion. In diving into teaching a bit on eschatology, I have come to feel a bit like someone who has encountered one of the versions of the certification test for senior generalists, or the ultimate final exam. (You’ll find a few different versions and titles.) The extra credit question, “Define the universe. Give three examples,” is a bit of the right feeling.

There does not seem to be any aspect of biblical studies that is not important or even critical in understanding eschatology. Some of the best examples of how not to interpret an be found in the way people handle this subject. There is always the problem of background information. How much must the student know before tackling a topic? But in eschatology, those background items become even more critical.

Tonight I’m going to work from Dr. Vick’s second chapter, “They Remembered Him,” and discuss what is the core of explicitly Christian eschatology. It’s quite easy for people to predict the end of the world. It may take some time, but eventually somebody is likely to be right! But does a particular outline of the end times make this doctrine Christian?

We frequently neglect eschatology in teaching and preaching. But how well does the gospel work when do this? Is it possible just to ignore this issue? Even when we talk eschatology in an individual sense, not when will the world come to an end (if it will), but when will you personally come to an end and meet God? And the latter question may not be quite as simple as it seems either. Are these events simultaneous? Do I go to heaven when I die or not?

So join me tonight as I discuss these issues and also the foundation for what Jesus said in his little apocalypse. You can find in on its Google+ Event Page or using the YouTube embedded below.

Similar Posts


    1. In connection with what? I’m not certain how it applies to this particular topic, though my experience with eschatology suggests that it will. I am personally unconvinced of an early high christology and I will comment on that tonight.

      I also want to make sure that all are aware that I am using Dr. Vick’s text. He doesn’t have any direct involvement with this series, though I am his publisher.

      1. Presence. I am impressed with the story that is not dependent on a linear model of time. It is dependent on acute presence including both judgment and mercy. That for me is the eschaton.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *