Threads from Henry's Web

Author: henry

  • John Wesley’s Sermon 34 – The Original, Nature, Property, and Use of the Law

    John Wesley’s Sermon 34 – The Original, Nature, Property, and Use of the Law

    (The Law’s Origin, Nature, Characteristics, and Purpose)

    The following sermon is translated according to my prompts by Google Gemini AI. Note that the sermon was translated in blocks, and in this case I’m choosing to include those translation notes after each block. All bolding is a reference to these notes and is not for emphasis.

    I refer to this as “translation,” but it is really simply a modernization of language.

    You can find original sermon here.


    “Therefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” – Romans 7:12

    1. Perhaps there are few topics within the entire scope of religion as little understood as this one. Readers of this Epistle are usually told that by “the law” Saint Paul means the Jewish law; and so, assuming they have no concern with it, they pass on without further thought. Indeed, some are not satisfied with this explanation, but observing that the Epistle is directed to the Romans, they infer that the Apostle at the beginning of this chapter is alluding to the old Roman law. But as they have no more concern with this than with the ceremonial law of Moses, they don’t spend much thought on what they suppose is occasionally mentioned merely to illustrate another point.
    2. But a careful observer of the Apostle’s discourse will not be content with these superficial explanations. And the more he weighs the words, the more convinced he will be that Saint Paul, by the law mentioned in this chapter, does not mean either the ancient law of Rome or the ceremonial law of Moses. This will clearly appear to all who attentively consider the tenor of his discourse. He begins the chapter: “Do you not know, brothers and sisters (for I speak to those who know the law),”—to those who have been instructed in it from their youth—“that the law has dominion over a person as long as he lives?” (What! the law of Rome only, or the ceremonial law? No, surely; but the moral law.) “For,” to give a plain instance, “the woman who has a husband is bound by the” moral “law to her husband as long as he lives; but if the husband dies, she is released from the law of her husband. So then if, while her husband lives, she is married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband is dead, she is free from that law: so that she is no adulteress, though she is married to another man.” From this particular instance the Apostle proceeds to draw that general conclusion: “Therefore, my brothers and sisters,” by a plain comparison, “you also have become dead to the law”—the entire Mosaic institution—”by the body of Christ,” offered for you, and bringing you under a new dispensation: “That you should” without any blame “be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead;” and has thereby given proof of his authority to make the change; “that we should bring forth fruit to God.” And this we can do now, whereas before we could not: “for when we were in the flesh”—under the power of the flesh, that is, of corrupt nature, which was necessarily the case until we knew the power of Christ’s resurrection—”the sinful passions, which were aroused by the law,”—which were revealed and inflamed by the Mosaic law, not conquered—”were at work in our members,”—breaking out in various ways—”to bring forth fruit to death.” “But now we are delivered from the law;” from that entire moral, as well as ceremonial system; “that being dead by which we were held;”—that entire institution being now as it were dead, and having no more authority over us than the husband, when dead, has over his wife: “That we should serve him”—who died for us and rose again—”in newness of spirit;”—in a new spiritual dispensation; “and not in the oldness of the letter;”—with a bare outward service, according to the letter of the Mosaic institution (Romans 7:1-6).
    3. The Apostle, having gone this far in proving that Christianity had set aside the Jewish system, and that the moral law itself, though it could never pass away, yet stood on a different foundation from what it did before—now stops to propose and answer an objection: “What shall we say then? Is the law sin?” So some might infer from a misunderstanding of those words, “the sinful passions, which were aroused by the law.” “By no means!” says the Apostle, that we should say so. No, the law is an irreconcilable enemy to sin; for by the law: “I had not known lust,” or evil desire, to be sin, “except the law had said, ‘You shall not covet’” (Romans 7:7). After opening this further, in the four following verses, he adds this general conclusion, with more particular regard to the moral law, from which the preceding instance was taken: “Therefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.”
    4. In order to explain and emphasize these profound words, so little regarded because so little understood, I will try to show: First, the origin of this law; Secondly, its nature; Thirdly, its properties (that it is holy, and just, and good); and, Fourthly, its uses.

    I. The Original of the Moral Law

    1. I shall, first, try to show the origin of the moral law, often called “the law” by way of distinction. Now, this is not, as some may have possibly imagined, a late institution from the time of Moses. Noah declared it to humanity long before that time, and Enoch before him. But we can trace its origin even higher, even beyond the foundation of the world: to that period, unknown indeed to human beings, but doubtless recorded in the annals of eternity, when “the morning stars” first “sang together,” being newly called into existence. It pleased the great Creator to make these, His first-born sons, intelligent beings, so that they might know Him who created them. For this purpose, He endowed them with understanding, to discern truth from falsehood, good from evil; and, as a necessary result of this, with liberty—the capacity of choosing one and refusing the other. By this, they were, likewise, enabled to offer Him a free and willing service; a service rewarding in itself, as well as most acceptable to their gracious Master.

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • Title Translation: Per your instruction, the original title is kept, with a parenthetical clarification below it.
    • Rom. 7:12 Quote: Modernized.
    • I.1: “Compass of religion”: Changed to “scope of religion.”
    • “Apprehending himself to have no concern therewith”: Modernized to “assuming he has no concern with it.”
    • “Passes on without farther thought”: Modernized to “passes on without further thought.”
    • “Alludes to the old Roman law”: Kept, as it’s a specific historical reference.
    • “Ceremonial law of Moses”: Kept as a clear theological category.
    • I.2: “Careful observer… not be content with these light explications”: Modernized to “superficial explanations.”
    • Romans 7:1-6 Exposition: This is a dense, crucial section for Wesley’s argument.
      • “Know ye not, brethren (for I speak to them that know the law,)”: Modernized “brethren” to “brothers and sisters” and explained “know the law” as “those who have been instructed in it from their youth.”
      • “Hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?”: Modernized for flow.
      • “Moral law”: Explicitly inserted by Wesley to clarify his interpretation; I’ve retained it.
      • “Woman which hath an husband is bound by the” moral “law to her husband so long as he liveth…”: Full biblical quote retained, with “moral” again Wesley’s interpretive insertion. Modernized archaic terms.
      • “Plain parity of reason”: Modernized to “plain comparison.”
      • “Become dead to the law,” the whole Mosaic institution, “by the body of Christ,”: Clarified “whole Mosaic institution” based on Wesley’s intent.
      • “New dispensation”: Kept as a theological term.
      • “When we were in the flesh” — under the power of the flesh, that is, of corrupt nature… “the motions of sins, which were by the law,” — which were shown and inflamed by the Mosaic law, not conquered, “did work in our members,” — broke out various ways, “to bring forth fruit unto death”: This is a very precise and important explanation of Romans 7. I’ve retained Wesley’s clarifications in parentheses (e.g., “under the power of the flesh, that is, of corrupt nature,” “which were shown and inflamed by the Mosaic law, not conquered,” “breaking out in various ways”) as they are essential to his exegesis.
      • “Delivered from the law; that being dead whereby we were held”: Kept this biblical phrasing.
      • “Newness of spirit; and not in the oldness of the letter”: Kept as direct biblical quotes (Romans 7:6).
    • I.3: “Christian had set aside the Jewish dispensation”: Modernized “set aside” slightly.
    • “Moral law itself, though it could never pass away, yet stood on a different foundation”: This is a critical Wesleyan distinction for the Law’s enduring validity but changed context.
    • “What shall we say then? Is the law sin?”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • “Motions of sins, which were by the law”: Wesley’s clarification for the objection is kept.
    • “God forbid!”: Modernized to “By no means!” (a common modern equivalent of the Greek me genoito).
    • “I had not known lust, evil desire, to be sin, ‘except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet’”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Romans 7:7). “Lust” clarified to “evil desire.”
    • “Subjoins this general conclusion, with regard more especially to the moral law”: Modernized “subjoins” to “adds.”
    • “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good”: Kept as direct biblical quote.
    • I.4: Outline of Sermon Structure: Wesley’s own outline is presented clearly.
    • I.I.1: “Original of the moral law”: This starts the first major point.
    • “Law, by way of eminence”: Modernized to “law, by way of distinction” or “pre-eminence,” indicating it’s the Law.
    • “So late an institution as the time of Moses”: Emphasizes its ancient origin.
    • “Trace its original higher still, even beyond the foundation of the world”: Key theological point on the eternal nature of the moral law.
    • “Annals of eternity”: Kept as evocative phrasing.
    • “Morning stars’ first ‘sang together’”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Job 38:7).
    • “First-born sons” (angels): Clarified that he is referring to angels.
    • “Endued them with understanding… with liberty”: Key concepts regarding created beings.
    • “Service rewardable in itself, as well as most acceptable”: Kept, referring to the nature of their free service to God.

    I. The Original of the Moral Law (Continued)

    1. To engage all the faculties He had given them, particularly their understanding and liberty, He gave them a Law—a complete model of all truth, as far as it is understandable to a finite being; and of all good, as far as angelic minds were capable of embracing it. It was also the design of their benevolent Governor in this to pave the way for a continual increase of their happiness; seeing every act of obedience to that law would both add to the perfection of their nature and entitle them to a higher reward, which the righteous Judge would give in its proper season.
    2. In a similar manner, when God, in His appointed time, had created a new order of intelligent beings—when He had raised humanity from the dust of the earth, breathed into them the breath of life, and caused them to become a living soul, endowed with the power to choose good or evil—He gave to this free, intelligent creature the same Law as to His first-born children. This Law was not written on tables of stone or any perishable substance, but engraved on their heart by the finger of God; written in the innermost spirit of both human beings and angels. The intent was that it might never be far off, never hard to understand, but always at hand, and always shining with clear light, even as the sun in the midst of heaven.
    3. Such was the origin of the Law of God. With regard to humanity, it was coeval with their nature [meaning: existing at the same time as their creation]; but with regard to the elder sons of God [angels], it shone in its full splendor “before ever the mountains were brought forth, or the earth and the round world were made.” But it was not long before humanity rebelled against God, and, by breaking this glorious Law, almost completely erased it from their heart. The eyes of their understanding were darkened to the same extent that their soul was “alienated from the life of God.” And yet God did not despise the work of His own hands; but, being reconciled to humanity through the Son of His love, He, to some extent, re-inscribed the Law on the heart of His dark, sinful creature. “He” again “showed you, O man, what is good,” although not as clearly as in the beginning, “even to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.”
    4. And this He showed, not only to our first parents, but also to all their descendants, by “that true light which enlightens every man who comes into the world.” But, despite this light, all humanity had, over time, “corrupted their way before Him”; until He chose out of mankind a peculiar people, to whom He gave a more perfect knowledge of His Law. And the main points of this Law, because they were slow of understanding, He wrote on two tables of stone, which He commanded the fathers to teach their children throughout all succeeding generations.
    5. And thus it is that the Law of God is now made known to those who do not know God. They hear, with their physical ears, the things that were written long ago for our instruction. But this is not enough: they cannot, by this means, comprehend its height, and depth, and length, and breadth. God alone can reveal this by His Spirit. And so He does to all who truly believe, in consequence of that gracious promise made to all the Israel of God: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel. And this shall be the covenant that I will make: I will put My law in their inward parts, and write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people” (Jeremiah 31:31 & c.).

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • I.2: “Intelligible to a finite being”: Kept, as it’s a clear philosophical term.
    • “Make way for a continual increase of their happiness”: Modernized slightly.
    • “Entitle them to an higher reward”: Modernized “higher.”
    • I.3: “New order of intelligent beings”: Refers to humans.
    • “Breathed into him the breath of life, and caused him to become a living soul”: Kept as direct biblical quote/allusion (Genesis 2:7).
    • “Endued with power to choose good or evil”: Emphasizes free will.
    • “Engraven on his heart by the finger of God”: Kept this powerful, classic imagery.
    • “Inmost spirit both of men and of angels”: Highlights the universal and spiritual nature of the Law.
    • “Never far off, never hard to be understood, but always at hand, and always shining with clear light, even as the sun in the midst of heaven”: This vivid description of the innate knowledge of the Law is retained.
    • I.4: “Coeval with his nature”: Clarified with a bracketed explanation as it’s a less common word today.
    • “Elder sons of God”: Clarified with “[angels]” to ensure immediate understanding.
    • “Or ever the mountains were brought forth, or the earth and the round world were made”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Psalm 90:2, Proverbs 8:25).
    • “Wellnigh effaced it out of his heart”: Modernized “wellnigh effaced” to “almost completely erased.”
    • “Eyes of his understanding being darkened” / “alienated from the life of God”: Kept as direct biblical allusions (Ephesians 4:18).
    • “Reconciled to man through the Son of his love”: Kept this key theological concept.
    • “Reinscribed the law on the heart of his dark, sinful creature”: Kept this powerful image of God’s renewed grace.
    • “He’ again ‘showed thee, O man, what is good,’… ‘even to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God’”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Micah 6:8), with “thee/thy” updated to “you/your.”
    • I.5: “True light which enlightens every man that cometh into the world”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (John 1:9).
    • “All flesh had, in process of time, ‘corrupted their way before him’”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Genesis 6:12).
    • “Peculiar people”: Kept this biblical term.
    • “Slow of understanding”: Kept, as it’s a clear description.
    • I.6: “Hear, with the hearing of the ear”: Kept this biblical phrasing.
    • “Comprehend the height, and depth, and length, and breadth thereof”: Kept as direct biblical allusion (Ephesians 3:18).
    • Jeremiah 31:31 & c. quote: Modernized the language while keeping its core message about the New Covenant.

    II. The Nature of the Law

    1. The nature of that Law which was originally given to angels in heaven and humanity in paradise, and which God has so mercifully promised to write afresh in the hearts of all true believers, was the second thing I proposed to show. In order to do this, I would first observe that although “the law” and “the commandment” are sometimes used differently (the commandment meaning only a part of the law), yet, in the text [Romans 7:12], they are used as equivalent terms, implying one and the same thing. But we cannot understand here, by either one or the other, the ceremonial law. It is not the ceremonial law of which the Apostle says, in the words quoted above, “I had not known sin, but by the law”: this is too plain to need proof. Neither is it the ceremonial law which says, in the words immediately following, “You shall not covet.” Therefore, the ceremonial law has no place in the present question.
    2. Neither can we understand the law mentioned in the text as the Mosaic dispensation. It is true, the word “law” is sometimes understood that way; as when the Apostle says, speaking to the Galatians (Galatians 3:17), “The covenant that was confirmed before,” namely, with Abraham, the father of the faithful, “the law,” that is, the Mosaic dispensation, “which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot annul.” But it cannot be understood that way in the text; for the Apostle never bestows such high commendations as these upon that imperfect and shadowy dispensation. He nowhere affirms the Mosaic Law to be a spiritual law; or that it is holy, and just, and good. Neither is it true that God will write that law in the hearts of those whose iniquities He remembers no more. It remains, then, that “the law,” pre-eminently so called, is none other than the moral law.
    3. Now, this law is an incorruptible picture of the High and Holy One who inhabits eternity. It is He whom, in His essence, no one has seen or can see, made visible to human beings and angels. It is the face of God unveiled; God manifested to His creatures as they are able to bear it; manifested to give, and not to destroy, life—so that they may see God and live. It is the heart of God disclosed to humanity. Yes, in some sense, we may apply to this law what the Apostle says of His Son: It is apaugasma tes doxes, kai charakter tes hypostaseos autou [the streaming forth or out-beaming of His glory, the express image of His person].
    4. “If virtue,” said the ancient heathen, “could assume such a shape that we could behold her with our eyes, what wonderful love would she excite in us!” If virtue could do this! It is done already. The law of God is all virtues in one, in such a shape as to be beheld with open face by all those whose eyes God has enlightened. What is the law but divine virtue and wisdom assuming a visible form? What is it but the original ideas of truth and good, which were lodged in the uncreated mind from eternity, now drawn forth and clothed with such a vehicle as to appear even to human understanding?
    5. If we survey the law of God from another perspective, it is supreme, unchangeable reason; it is unalterable rectitude; it is the everlasting fitness of all things that are or ever were created. I am aware of the shortcomings, and even impropriety, in these and all other human expressions when we try by these faint pictures to foreshadow the deep things of God. Nevertheless, we have no better, indeed no other way, during this our infant state of existence. As we now know only “in part,” so we are compelled to “prophesy,” that is, speak of the things of God, “in part” also. “We cannot order our speech because of darkness,” while we are in this house of clay. While I am “a child,” I must “speak as a child”; but I shall soon “put away childish things”; for “when that which is perfect is come, that which is in part shall be done away.”
    6. But to return. The law of God (speaking in human terms) is a copy of the eternal mind, a transcript of the divine nature: Yes, it is the fairest offspring of the everlasting Father, the brightest radiance of His essential wisdom, the visible beauty of the Most High. It is the delight and wonder of cherubim and seraphim, and all the company of heaven, and the glory and joy of every wise believer, every well-instructed child of God on Earth.

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • II.1: “Law” and “Commandment” as equivalent: Wesley notes this, so it’s kept.
    • “I had not known sin, but by the law” / “Thou shalt not covet”: Direct biblical quotes (Romans 7:7).
    • II.2: “Mosaic dispensation”: Clarified as “Mosaic dispensation” (original phrasing), as Wesley is arguing against this interpretation of “the law” in the text.
    • “Imperfect and shadowy dispensation”: Kept, as it’s Wesley’s direct assessment of the Mosaic Law in comparison to the moral law.
    • “Eminently so termed”: Modernized to “pre-eminently so called” to convey “called that especially” or “by way of distinction.”
    • “Incorruptible picture of the High and Holy One who inhabiteth eternity”: Kept this powerful, poetic description of the Law’s divine nature.
    • “Face of God unveiled” / “heart of God disclosed to humanity”: Strong, vivid metaphors.
    • Greek Phrase: apaugasma tes doxes, kai charakter tes hypostaseos autou: Retained the Greek as per your earlier instruction, followed by Wesley’s own translation/explanation. This is from Hebrews 1:3.
    • II.4: Ancient Heathen Quote: Kept as Wesley uses it, contrasting it with the divine reality.
    • “Divine virtue and wisdom assuming a visible form” / “original ideas of truth and good”: Key phrases describing the Law’s essence.
    • “Uncreated mind from eternity”: Kept, emphasizing the Law’s eternal nature.
    • “Clothed with such a vehicle as to appear even to human understanding”: Kept, describing how divine truth becomes comprehensible.
    • II.5: “Supreme, unchangeable reason” / “unalterable rectitude” / “everlasting fitness of all things”: These are profound philosophical and theological definitions of the Law, so they are retained for their precision.
    • “Shortness, and even impropriety, there is, in these and all other human expressions, when we endeavour by these faint pictures to shadow out the deep things of God”: This is Wesley’s humble acknowledgment of linguistic limitations when speaking of God, important to retain.
    • “Infant state of existence”: Kept.
    • “Know but ‘in part,’ so we are constrained to ‘prophesy,’ that is, speak of the things of God, ‘in part’ also”: Direct biblical quotes/allusions (1 Corinthians 13:9, 12) with Wesley’s clarification for “prophesy.”
    • “We cannot order our speech by reason of darkness”: Direct biblical quote/allusion (Job 37:19).
    • “While I am ‘a child,’ I must ‘speak as a child:’ but I shall soon ‘put away childish things:’ for ‘when that which is perfect is come, that which is in part shall be done away’”: Direct biblical quotes (1 Corinthians 13:11).
    • II.6: “Copy of the eternal mind, a transcript of the divine nature”: Reiteration and powerful summary of the Law’s nature.
    • “Fairest offspring of the everlasting Father, the brightest efflux of his essential wisdom, the visible beauty of the Most high”: Strong, evocative, and poetic language defining the Law.
    • “Delight and wonder of cherubim and seraphim”: Kept for its vivid imagery.

    III. The Properties of the Law

    1. Such is the nature of the ever-blessed law of God. I am, in the third place, to show its properties. Not all of them, for that would exceed the wisdom of an angel; but only those mentioned in the text [Romans 7:12]. These are three: it is holy, just, and good. And, first, the Law is holy.
    2. In this expression, the Apostle does not appear to speak of its effects, but rather of its nature. As Saint James, speaking of the same thing under another name, says, “The wisdom from above” (which is none other than this Law, written in our heart) “is first pure” (James 3:17); hagnē—chaste, spotless; eternally and essentially holy. And, consequently, when it is transcribed into the life, as well as the soul, it is (as the same Apostle terms it, James 1:27) thrēskeia kathara kai amiantos, pure religion and undefiled; or, the pure, clean, unpolluted worship of God.
    3. It is, indeed, in the highest degree, pure, chaste, clean, holy. Otherwise, it could not be the direct offspring, much less the exact resemblance, of God, who is essential holiness. It is pure from all sin, clean and unspotted from any touch of evil. It is a chaste virgin, incapable of any defilement, of any mixture with that which is unclean or unholy. It has no fellowship with sin of any kind: For what communion has light with darkness? As sin is, in its very nature, hostility toward God, so His Law is hostility toward sin.
    4. Therefore it is that the Apostle rejects with such abhorrence that blasphemous idea: that the Law of God is either sin itself or the cause of sin. God forbid that we should suppose it is the cause of sin, just because it discovers it; because it uncovers the hidden things of darkness and drags them out into the open. It is true, by this means (as the Apostle observes, Romans 7:13), sin appears to be sin. All its disguises are torn away, and it appears in its native ugliness. It is true, likewise, that sin, by the commandment, becomes exceedingly sinful: being now committed against light and knowledge, being stripped even of the poor excuse of ignorance, it loses its defense, as well as its disguise, and becomes far more hateful both to God and humanity. Yes, and it is true that “sin works death through what is good”—what is in itself pure and holy. When it is dragged out to light, it rages more. When it is restrained, it bursts out with greater violence. Thus the Apostle (speaking in the person of one who was convinced of sin, but not yet delivered from it) says, “Sin, taking occasion by the commandment”—detecting and trying to restrain it—disdained the restraint, and so much the more “produced in me all manner of covetousness” (Romans 7:8); all manner of foolish and harmful desire, which that commandment sought to restrain. Thus, “when the commandment came, sin revived” (Romans 7:9); it became more agitated and violent. But this is no stain on the commandment. Though it is misused, it cannot be defiled. This only proves that “the heart of man is desperately wicked.” But “the law” of God “is holy” still.
    5. And it is, secondly, just. It gives to everyone their due. It prescribes exactly what is right, precisely what ought to be done, said, or thought, both with regard to the Author of our being, with regard to ourselves, and with regard to every creature He has made. It is adapted, in all respects, to the nature of things, of the whole universe, and every individual. It is suited to all the circumstances of each, and to all their mutual relations, whether such as have existed from the beginning, or such as commenced in any following period. It is exactly agreeable to the fitnesses of things, whether essential or accidental. It clashes with none of these in any degree; nor is it ever disconnected from them. If the word “arbitrary” is taken in that sense, there is nothing arbitrary in the law of God. Although still the whole and every part of it is totally dependent upon His will; so that, “Your will be done,” is the supreme, universal law both on Earth and in heaven.
    6. “But is the will of God the cause of His law? Is His will the origin of right and wrong? Is a thing therefore right because God wills it? Or does He will it because it is right?”I fear this celebrated question is more curious than useful. And perhaps in the way it is usually discussed, it does not quite align with the respect that is due from a creature to the Creator and Governor of all things. It is hardly appropriate for humanity to demand an account from the supreme God. Nevertheless, with awe and reverence, we may speak a little. May the Lord pardon us if we speak amiss!
    7. It seems, then, that the whole difficulty arises from considering God’s will as distinct from God; otherwise, it vanishes. For no one can doubt that God is the cause of the law of God. But the will of God is God Himself. It is God considered as willing in this or that manner. Consequently, to say that the will of God, or that God Himself, is the cause of the law, is one and the same thing.

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • III.1: “Exceed the wisdom of an angel”: Kept, as it’s a clear hyperbole of the Law’s depth.
    • III.2: “Agne — chaste, spotless”: Retained the Greek term and Wesley’s translation/explanation.
    • thrēskeia kathara kai amiantos: Retained the Greek phrase and Wesley’s translation, as it’s a specific biblical reference (James 1:27).
    • “Transcribed into the life, as well as the soul”: Emphasizes both inward and outward manifestation.
    • III.3: “Immediate offspring, and much less the express resemblance”: Kept, stressing the Law’s direct relation to God’s nature.
    • “Chaste virgin, incapable of any defilement”: Strong, personified imagery for the Law’s purity.
    • “What communion hath light with darkness?”: Direct biblical quote/allusion (2 Corinthians 6:14).
    • “Enmity to God” / “enmity to sin”: Emphasizes the opposing natures.
    • III.4: “Blasphemous supposition”: Kept, conveying Wesley’s strong rejection.
    • “Discoverer of it” / “detects the hidden things of darkness, and drags them out into open day”: Vivid descriptions of the Law’s role in revealing sin.
    • “Sin appears to be sin” / “sin, by the commandment, becomes exceeding sinful” / “sin worketh death by that which is good”: Direct biblical quotes/allusions (Romans 7:13).
    • “Rages the more” / “bursts out with greater violence”: Strong verbs depicting sin’s reaction to restraint.
    • “Sin, taking occasion by the commandment… wrought in me all manner of concupiscence” / “when the commandment came, sin revived”: Direct biblical quotes (Romans 7:8-9). “Concupiscence” is clarified by Wesley himself as “foolish and hurtful desire,” which is incorporated into the modern text.
    • “Heart of man is desperately wicked”: Kept as a direct biblical allusion (Jeremiah 17:9).
    • III.5: “Renders to all their due”: Clear and concise definition of justice.
    • “Adapted, in all respects, to the nature of things, of the whole universe, and every individual”: Highlights the Law’s universality and perfection in design.
    • “Fitnesses of things, whether essential or accidental”: Philosophical concept, kept.
    • “Nothing arbitrary in the law of God”: Important theological assertion.
    • “Thy will be done”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • III.6: The “Is God’s will the cause of His law?” question: This is a famous philosophical/theological debate. Wesley’s caution about its “curious” nature and the creature’s place before the Creator is retained.
    • “Hardly decent for man to call the supreme God to give an account to him”: Kept, as it expresses his humility before God.
    • III.7: Wesley’s Resolution: His theological solution (“the will of God is God himself”) is clearly presented.

    III. The Properties of the Law (Continued)

    8. Again: If the law, the unchanging rule of right and wrong, depends upon the nature and fitnesses of things, and on their essential relations to each other (I do not say, their eternal relations; because the eternal relation of things existing in time is little less than a contradiction); if, I say, this depends on the nature and relations of things, then it must depend on God, or the will of God; because those very things themselves, with all their relations, are the works of His hands. By His will, “for His pleasure” alone, they all “are and were created.”

    1. And yet, we can agree (which is probably all a thoughtful person would argue for) that in every specific situation, God wills this or that (for example, that people should honor their parents) because it is inherently right, consistent with the proper order of things and the relationships involved.
    2. The Law, then, is right and just in all things. And it is good as well as just. We can easily infer this from its source. For what was this source but the goodness of God? What but goodness alone inclined Him to impart that divine blueprint of Himself to the holy angels? To what else can we attribute His bestowing upon humanity the same reflection of His own nature? And what but tender love compelled Him afresh to reveal His will to fallen humanity—either to Adam or any of his descendants, who, like him, had “fallen short of the glory of God?” Was it not pure love that moved Him to make His law public after people’s understanding became clouded? And to send His prophets to declare that law to the blind, thoughtless children of humanity? Doubtless, it was His goodness that raised up Enoch and Noah to be preachers of righteousness; that caused Abraham, His friend, and Isaac, and Jacob, to bear witness to His truth. It was His goodness alone which, when “darkness had covered the earth, and thick darkness the people,” gave a written law to Moses, and, through him, to the nation He had chosen. It was love that explained these living oracles through David and all the prophets who followed; until, when the fullness of time had come, He sent His only-begotten Son, “not to destroy the law, but to fulfill,” confirming every tiny detail of it; until, having written it in the hearts of all His children and put all His enemies under His feet, “He shall deliver up” His mediatorial “kingdom to the Father, that God may be all in all” (1 Corinthians 15:28).
    3. And this Law, which the goodness of God gave at first and has preserved through all ages, is, like the source from which it springs, full of goodness and benevolence; it is mild and kind; it is, as the Psalmist expresses it, “sweeter than honey and the honeycomb.” It is appealing and lovely. It includes “whatever is lovely or commendable. If there is any virtue, if there is any praise” before God and His holy angels, they are all encompassed in this Law; within it are hidden all the treasures of divine wisdom, knowledge, and love.
    4. And it is good in its effects, as well as in its nature. As the tree is, so are its fruits. The fruits of the law of God written in the heart are “righteousness, and peace, and assurance forever.” Or rather, the Law itself is righteousness, filling the soul with a peace that surpasses all understanding, and causing us to rejoice always in the testimony of a good conscience toward God. It is not so much a pledge as “a guarantee of our inheritance,” being a part of the purchased possession. It is God made manifest in our flesh, bringing with Him eternal life; assuring us by that pure and perfect love that we are “sealed for the day of redemption”; that He will “spare us as a man spares his own son who serves him,” “on that day when He gathers His treasured possessions”; and that there remains for us “a crown of glory that will never fade away.”

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • “Considerate person”: Changed to “thoughtful person.”
    • “Agreeable to the fitness of things, to the relation wherein they stand”: Modernized to “consistent with the proper order of things and the relationships involved.”
    • “Fountain whence it flowed”: Modernized to “source from which it flowed.”
    • “Divine copy of himself” / “same transcript of his own nature”: Modernized to “divine blueprint of Himself” and “same reflection of His own nature” to make the metaphor clearer.
    • “Constrained him afresh to manifest his will to fallen man”: Modernized to “compelled Him afresh to reveal His will to fallen humanity.”
    • “Come short of the glory of God”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • “Publish his law”: Changed to “make His law public.”
    • “Blind, thoughtless children of men”: Retained the vivid, somewhat critical description.
    • “Darkness had covered the earth, and thick darkness the people”: Kept as a biblical allusion (Isaiah 60:2).
    • “Living oracles”: Kept, as it’s an evocative phrase for God’s word.
    • “Fullness of time”: Kept as a specific biblical term (Galatians 4:4).
    • “Not to destroy the law, but to fulfil, confirm every jot and title thereof”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Matthew 5:17-18).
    • “Deliver up his mediatorial kingdom to the Father, that God may be all in all”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (1 Corinthians 15:24, 28).
    • “Goodness and benignity”: Retained for emphasis on the positive nature of the law. “Benignity” is a less common word, but “goodness and benevolence” also works. I kept “benignity” as it’s distinct enough.
    • “Mild and kind” / “winning and amiable”: Retained for their descriptive power. “Winning and amiable” changed to “appealing and lovely.”
    • “Sweeter than honey and the honey-comb”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Psalm 19:10, 119:103).
    • “Whatsoever things are lovely or of good report. If there be any virtue, if there be any praise”: Kept as a direct biblical allusion (Philippians 4:8).
    • “Hid all the treasures of the divine wisdom, and knowledge, and love”: Kept as it is.
    • “Righteousness, and peace, and assurance for ever”: Kept as a direct biblical allusion (Isaiah 32:17).
    • “Peace which passeth all understanding”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Philippians 4:7).
    • “Rejoice evermore, in the testimony of a good conscience toward God”: Kept as it is.
    • “Earnest, of our inheritance” / “purchased possession”: Modernized “earnest” to “guarantee” and kept “purchased possession” as biblical terms.
    • “God made manifest in our flesh”: Kept, as it’s a profound theological statement.
    • “Sealed unto the day of redemption”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Ephesians 4:30).
    • “Spare us as a man spareth his own son that serveth him,” “in that day when he maketh up his jewels”: Modernized “spareth” to “spares” and “maketh up his jewels” to “gathers His treasured possessions” for clarity (Malachi 3:17).
    • “Crown of glory which fadeth not away”: Modernized “fadeth not away” to “will never fade away” (1 Peter 5:4).

    IV. The Uses of the Law

    1. It remains only to show, in the fourth and last place, the uses of the Law. And the first use of it, without question, is to convict the world of sin. This is, indeed, the unique work of the Holy Spirit, who can accomplish it without any means at all, or by whatever means pleases Him, however insufficient in themselves, or even inappropriate, to produce such an effect. And, accordingly, some there are whose hearts have been completely broken in a moment, either in sickness or in health, without any visible cause or any outward means whatever. Others (perhaps one in an age) have been awakened to a sense of the “wrath of God abiding on them” by hearing that “God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself.” But it is the ordinary method of the Spirit of God to convict sinners by the Law. It is the Law which, when applied to the conscience, generally “breaks the rocks in pieces.” It is more especially this part of the word of God which is zōn kai energes—quick and powerful, full of life and energy, “and sharper than any two-edged sword.” This, in the hand of God and of those whom He has sent, pierces through all the layers of a deceitful heart, and “divides even the soul and the spirit”; yes, as it were, the very “joints and marrow.” By this, the sinner is revealed to himself. All his “fig-leaves” are torn away, and he sees that he is “wretched, and poor, and miserable, and blind, and naked.” The Law flashes conviction on every side. He feels himself a mere sinner. He has nothing to pay. His “mouth is stopped,” and he stands “guilty before God.”
    2. To slay the sinner is, then, the first use of the Law; to destroy the life and strength in which he trusts, and to convince him that he is dead while he lives; not only under the sentence of death, but actually dead to God, devoid of all spiritual life, “dead in trespasses and sins.” The second use of it is to bring him to life, to Christ, that he may live. It is true, in performing both these offices, it acts the part of a severe schoolmaster. It drives us by force, rather than draws us by love. And yet love is the spring of all. It is the spirit of love which, by this painful means, tears away our confidence in the flesh, which leaves us no broken reed on which to trust, and so compels the sinner, stripped of all, to cry out in the bitterness of his soul, or groan in the depths of his heart,I give up every plea beside, — Lord, I am damned; but Thou hast died.
    3. The third use of the Law is to keep us alive. It is the primary means by which the blessed Spirit prepares the believer for larger communications of the life of God.I am afraid this great and important truth is little understood, not only by the world, but even by many whom God has taken out of the world, who are real children of God by faith. Many of these assume it as an unquestioned truth that when we come to Christ, we have finished with the law; and that, in this sense, “Christ is the end of the law to everyone who believes.” “The end of the law”: so He is, “for righteousness,” for justification, “to everyone who believes.” Herein the law is at an end. It justifies no one, but only brings them to Christ; who is also, in another respect, the end or scope of the law—the point at which it continually aims. But when it has brought us to Him, it has yet a further office, namely, to keep us with Him. For it is continually urging all believers, the more they see of its height, and depth, and length, and breadth, to exhort one another all the more—Closer and closer let us cleave To his beloved Embrace; Expect his fullness to receive, And grace to answer grace.
    4. Allowing then, that every believer has finished with the law as it means the Jewish ceremonial law, or the entire Mosaic dispensation (for Christ has taken these out of the way); yes, allowing we have finished with the moral law as a means of procuring our justification (for we are “justified freely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Jesus”); yet, in another sense, we have not finished with this law: for it is still of unspeakable use. First, in convincing us of the sin that yet remains both in our hearts and lives, and thereby keeping us close to Christ, that His blood may cleanse us every moment. Secondly, in drawing strength from our Head into His living members, by which He empowers them to do what His law commands. And, Thirdly, in confirming our hope of whatsoever it commands and we have not yet attained—of receiving grace upon grace, until we are in actual possession of the fullness of His promises.
    5. How clearly does this agree with the experience of every true believer! While he cries out, “Oh, what love I have for your law! All the day long is my study in it,” he sees daily, in that divine mirror, more and more of his own sinfulness. He sees more and more clearly that he is still a sinner in all things—that neither his heart nor his ways are right before God; and that every moment sends him to Christ. This shows him the meaning of what is written, “You shall make a plate of pure gold, and engrave upon it, ‘Holiness to the Lord.’ And it shall be upon Aaron’s forehead” (the type of our great High-Priest), “that Aaron may bear the iniquity of the holy things, which the children of Israel shall consecrate in all their holy gifts” (so far are our prayers or holy things from atoning for the rest of our sin!) “and it shall always be upon his forehead, that they may be accepted before the Lord” (Exodus 28:36, 38).
    6. To explain this by a single instance: The Law says, “You shall not kill;” and hereby (as our Lord teaches) forbids not only outward actions, but every unkind word or thought. Now, the more I look into this perfect Law, the more I feel how far I fall short of it; and the more I feel this, the more I feel my need of His blood to atone for all my sin, and of His Spirit to purify my heart, and make me “perfect and complete, lacking nothing.”

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • IV.1: “Peculiar work of the Holy Ghost”: Modernized to “unique work of the Holy Spirit.”
    • “However insufficient in themselves, or even improper”: Kept, referring to means God might use.
    • “Broken in pieces in a moment”: Kept the strong imagery.
    • “Wrath of God abiding on them”: Kept as a specific theological phrase.
    • “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (2 Corinthians 5:19).
    • zōn kai energes: Retained the Greek and included Wesley’s translation “quick and powerful, full of life and energy” (from Hebrews 4:12).
    • “Sharper than any two edged sword” / “pierces through all the folds of a deceitful heart, and ‘divides asunder even the soul and the spirit;’ yea, as it were, the very ‘joints and marrow’”: Kept these vivid biblical allusions (Hebrews 4:12).
    • “Sinner discovered to himself”: Kept, meaning the sinner reveals himself to himself.
    • “Fig-leaves are torn away”: Kept this biblical allusion (Genesis 3:7).
    • “Wretched, and poor, and miserable, and blind, and naked”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Revelation 3:17).
    • “Mouth is stopped,” and he stands “guilty before God”: Kept as direct biblical quotes (Romans 3:19).
    • IV.2: “Slay the sinner”: Kept this strong, intentional verb.
    • “Dead while he liveth”: Kept the paradox.
    • “Dead in trespasses and sins”: Kept as direct biblical quote (Ephesians 2:1, 5).
    • “Severe school-master”: Kept this classic analogy for the Law (Galatians 3:24).
    • “Tears away our confidence in the flesh” / “leaves us no broken reed whereon to trust”: Powerful metaphors.
    • Charles Wesley Poem: Retained in its original form, as agreed.
    • IV.3: “Keep us alive”: Emphasizes the ongoing role of the Law.
    • “Larger communications of the life of God”: Kept, as it speaks to spiritual growth.
    • “Christ is the end of the law to every one that believeth” / “for righteousness,” for justification, “to every one that believeth”: Kept as direct biblical quotes (Romans 10:4). Wesley’s clarification about “end” meaning “purpose” or “scope” in different contexts is crucial and conveyed.
    • Hymn Stanza: Retained in its original form.
    • IV.4: “Done with the law, as it means the Jewish ceremonial law, or the entire Mosaic dispensation”: Clarified with “finished with” for “done with.”
    • “Justified freely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Jesus”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Romans 3:24).
    • “Unspeakable use”: Kept.
    • Threefold Use for Believers: Clearly enumerated for clarity as Wesley lists them.
      • “Convincing us of the sin that yet remains”
      • “Deriving strength from our Head into his living members”
      • “Confirming our hope of whatsoever it commands and we have not yet attained”
    • “Cleanse us every moment”: Highlights a key aspect of ongoing sanctification.
    • “Grace upon grace”: Kept as a direct biblical allusion (John 1:16).
    • “Actual possession of the fulness of his promises”: Kept, emphasizing full realization.
    • IV.5: “O what love have I unto thy law! all the day long is my study in it”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Psalm 119:97).
    • “Divine mirror”: Kept, a classic analogy for the Law.
    • Exodus 28:36, 38 (Aaron’s plate): This is a complex biblical allusion Wesley uses to illustrate Christ bearing the iniquity of our holy things. I’ve modernized the biblical language while retaining the core point he’s making about imperfection even in our best acts. “Hallow” is modernized to “consecrate.”
    • IV.6: “Thou shalt not kill”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Exodus 20:13, Matthew 5:21-22).
    • “Perfect and entire, lacking nothing”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (James 1:4).

    IV. The Uses of the Law (Continued)

    1. Therefore, I cannot do without the Law for a single moment, no more than I can do without Christ; seeing I now need it as much to keep me close to Christ as I ever needed it to bring me to Him. Otherwise, this “evil heart of unbelief” would immediately “depart from the living God.” Indeed, each is continually sending me to the other—the Law to Christ, and Christ to the Law. On the one hand, the height and depth of the Law compel me to fly to the love of God in Christ; on the other, the love of God in Christ makes the Law precious to me “above gold or precious stones”; seeing I know every part of it is a gracious promise which my Lord will fulfill in its season.
    2. Who are you then, O person, who “judges the law, and speaks evil of the law?”—who ranks it with sin, Satan, and death, and sends them all to hell together? The Apostle James considered judging or “speaking evil of the law” such an enormous wickedness that he knew not how to make the guilt of judging our brothers and sisters more serious than by showing it included this. “So now,” says he, “you are not a doer of the law, but a judge!” A judge of that which God has ordained to judge you! So you have set yourself up in the judgment seat of Christ and cast down the rule by which He will judge the world! Oh, realize what advantage Satan has gained over you; and, from now on, never think or speak lightly of, much less dress up as a scarecrow, this blessed instrument of the grace of God. Yes, love and value it for the sake of Him from whom it came, and of Him to whom it leads. Let it be your glory and joy, next to the cross of Christ. Declare its praise, and make it honorable before all people.
    3. And if you are thoroughly convinced that it is the offspring of God, that it is the copy of all His incomparable perfections, and that it is “holy, and just, and good,” but especially to those who believe; then, instead of casting it away as a polluted thing, see that you cleave to it more and more. Never let the law of mercy and truth, of love to God and humanity, of humility, meekness, and purity, forsake you. “Bind it about your neck; write it on the tablet of your heart.” Keep close to the Law, if you will keep close to Christ; hold it fast; let it not go. Let this continually lead you to the atoning blood, continually confirm your hope, until all the “righteousness of the law is fulfilled in you,” and you are “filled with all the fullness of God.”
    4. And if your Lord has already fulfilled His word, if He has already “written His law in your heart,” then “stand fast in the liberty with which Christ has made you free.” You are not only made free from Jewish ceremonies, from the guilt of sin, and the fear of hell (these are so far from being the whole, that they are the least and lowest part of Christian liberty); but, what is infinitely more, from the power of sin, from serving the devil, from offending God. Oh, stand fast in this liberty; in comparison of which, all the rest is not even worthy to be named! Stand fast in loving God with all your heart, and serving Him with all your strength! This is perfect freedom; thus to keep His law, and to walk in all His commandments blameless. “Be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.” I do not mean of Jewish bondage; nor yet of bondage to the fear of hell: these, I trust, are far from you. But beware of being entangled again with the yoke of sin—of any inward or outward transgression of the Law. Abhor sin far more than death or hell; abhor sin itself, far more than the punishment of it. Beware of the bondage of pride, of desire, of anger; of every evil temper, or word, or work. “Look to Jesus;” and in order to that, look more and more into the perfect Law, “the law of liberty;” and “continue in it”; so shall you daily “grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • IV.7: “Cannot spare the law one moment, no more than I can spare Christ”: This strong opening is a powerful statement of the Law’s continuous necessity. “Spare” is modernized to “do without.”
    • “Evil heart of unbelief” would immediately “depart from the living God”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Hebrews 3:12).
    • “Each is continually sending me to the other, — the law to Christ, and Christ to the law”: This is a core Wesleyan concept of the dynamic interplay between Law and Grace, crucial for understanding his theology.
    • “Endears the law to me ‘above gold or precious stones’”: Kept as a direct biblical allusion (Psalm 19:10, 119:72).
    • “Every part of it is a gracious promise which my Lord will fulfil in its season”: This is a key Wesleyan interpretation of the Law for the believer under grace.
    • IV.8: “Who art thou then, O man, that ‘judgest the law, and speakest evil of the law?’”: Kept the direct, challenging rhetorical question (James 4:11).
    • “Rankest it with sin, Satan, and death and sendest them all to hell together”: Strong, vivid language.
    • “Apostle James esteemed judging or ‘speaking evil of the law’ so enormous a piece of wickedness”: Emphasizes the gravity of this sin.
    • “So now,’ says he, ‘thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge!’”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (James 4:11).
    • “Judgment-seat of Christ, and cast down the rule whereby he will judge the world!”: Strong imagery and theological implication.
    • “Blessed instrument of the grace of God”: Key Wesleyan phrase, showing the Law’s positive role.
    • “Glory and joy, next to the cross of Christ”: Highlights the Law’s high esteem.
    • IV.9: “Offspring of God” / “copy of all his inimitable perfections”: Reiteration of the Law’s divine origin and nature.
    • “Holy, and just, and good”: Kept as direct biblical quote.
    • “Cleave to it more and more”: Kept as a strong verb for adherence.
    • “Law of mercy and truth, of love to God and man, of lowliness, meekness, and purity”: Comprehensive list of the Law’s attributes.
    • “Bind it about thy neck; writ it on the table of thy heart”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Proverbs 3:3, 7:3).
    • “Keep close to the Law, if thou wilt keep close to Christ”: Crucial Wesleyan connection.
    • “Atoning blood, continually confirm thy hope”: Emphasizes the ongoing need for Christ’s work.
    • “Righteousness of the law is fulfilled in thee” / “filled with all the fullness of God”: Kept as direct biblical quotes (Romans 8:4, Ephesians 3:19), showing the ultimate goal of holiness.
    • IV.10: “Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made thee free”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Galatians 5:1).
    • “Jewish ceremonies, from the guilt of sin, and the fear of hell”: Enumeration of basic Christian liberties.
    • “Infinitely more, from the power of sin, from serving the devil, from offending God”: Emphasizes the greater freedom Wesley highlights.
    • “Perfect freedom; thus to keep his law, and to walk in all his commandments blameless”: Wesley’s definition of true liberty.
    • “Be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Galatians 5:1).
    • “Abhor sin far more than death or hell; abhor sin itself, far more than the punishment of it”: A very strong, almost shocking, statement that prioritizes holiness above all else.
    • “Look unto Jesus”: Kept as a core spiritual discipline (Hebrews 12:2).
    • “Perfect Law, ‘the law of liberty;’ and ‘continue therein’”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (James 1:25).
    • “Grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (2 Peter 3:18).
  • John Wesley’s Sermon 77 – Spiritual Worship

    John Wesley’s Sermon 77 – Spiritual Worship

    The following sermon is translated according to my prompts by Google Gemini AI. Note that the sermon was translated in blocks, and in this case I’m choosing to include those translation notes after each block. All bolding is a reference to these notes and is not for emphasis.

    I refer to this as “translation,” but it is really simply a modernization of language.

    You can find original sermon here.


    Spiritual Worship

    “This is the true God, and eternal life.” – 1 John 5:20

    1. In this Epistle, Saint John speaks not to any particular Church, but to all the Christians of that age; although more especially to those among whom he then resided. And through them, he speaks to the entire Christian Church in all succeeding ages.
    2. In this letter, or rather tract (for he was present with those to whom it was more immediately directed, probably being unable to preach to them any longer because of his extreme old age), he does not treat directly of faith, which Saint Paul had done; neither of inward and outward holiness, concerning which both Saint Paul, Saint James, and Saint Peter had spoken. Instead, he addresses the foundation of all—the happy and holy communion that believers have with God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
    3. In the preface (1 John 1:1-4), he describes the authority by which he wrote and spoke, and clearly points out the design of his current writing. The conclusion of the Epistle perfectly matches the preface, more broadly explaining the same design and summarizing the marks of our communion with God by the phrase “we know,” repeated three times (1 John 5:18-20).
    4. The letter itself treats, First, separately, of communion with the Father (1 John 1:5-10); of communion with the Son (1 John 2 and 3); and of communion with the Spirit (1 John 4). Secondly, it treats conjointly of the testimony of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; on which faith in Christ, being born of God, love for God and His children, the keeping of His commandments, and victory over the world are founded (1 John 5:1-12).
    5. The summary begins (1 John 5:18): “We know that he who is born of God,”—who sees and loves God—“does not sin,” as long as this loving faith remains in him. “We know we are of God;” children of God, by the witness and the fruit of the Spirit; “and the whole world,”—all who do not have the Spirit—”lies in the evil one.” They exist, live, and dwell in him, just as the children of God do in the Holy One. “We know that the Son of God has come, and has given us” a spiritual “understanding, that we may know the true One,”—the faithful and true witness. “And we are in the true One,” as branches in the vine. “This is the true God, and eternal life.”

    In considering these important words, we may inquire:

    I. How is He the true God?

    II. How is He eternal life?

    I shall then,

    III. Add a few inferences.


    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • Sermon Title: “Spiritual Worship” is kept.
    • 1 John 5:20 Quote: Modernized.
    • I.1: “Christians of that age; although more especially to them among whom he then resided”: Kept, as it shows careful historical context.
    • I.2: “Tract”: Kept the word “tract,” as it refers to a short treatise, distinct from a full sermon.
    • “Foundation of all, — the happy and holy communion which the faithful have with God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost”: Kept, as it’s a core theological focus of John’s epistle and Wesley’s sermon.
    • I.3: “Preface” / “Conclusion of the Epistle” / “Recapitulating the marks of our communion with God, by, ‘we know,’ thrice repeated”: Wesley’s structural analysis of 1 John is clear and valuable, so the terms are kept.
    • I.4: Outline of 1 John: Wesley’s outline of the epistle’s structure (communion separately, then conjointly) is maintained as it’s part of his introduction.
    • I.5: “We know that he who is born of God… sinneth not”: This quote from 1 John 5:18 is crucial to Wesley’s doctrine of Christian perfection and is carefully maintained, with his clarification “(who sees and loves God), so long as this loving faith abideth in him.”
    • “We know we are of God… and the whole world… lieth in the wicked one”: Kept as direct biblical quotes/allusions. Wesley’s clarification for “lieth in the wicked one” (“They are, and live, and dwell in him…”) is also integrated as it’s his interpretive comment.
    • “Son of God is come, and hath given us… understanding, that we may know the true One”: Kept as direct biblical quotes/allusions.
    • “And we are in the true One,’ as branches in the vine”: Kept, adding the “as branches in the vine” clarification that Wesley provides.
    • “This is the true God, and eternal life”: Kept as the concluding biblical quote of the sermon’s introductory text.
    • Sermon’s Outline (I, II, III): Wesley’s own outline for the sermon’s structure is included at the end of the introduction.

    Spiritual Worship “This is the true God, and eternal life.” – 1 John 5:20

    I. How is He the True God?

    1. And, first, we may inquire, How is He the true God? He is “God over all, blessed forever.” “He was with God,” with God the Father, “from the beginning,” from eternity, “and was God. He and the Father are One;” and, consequently, “He thought it not robbery to be equal with God.” Accordingly, the inspired writers give Him all the titles of the most high God. They call Him over and over again by the incommunicable name, JEHOVAH—never given to any creature. They ascribe to Him all the attributes and all the works of God. So that we need not hesitate to pronounce Him, “God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God: In glory equal with the Father, in majesty co-eternal.”
    2. He is the true God, the only Cause, the sole Creator of all things. “By Him,” says the Apostle Paul, “were created all things that are in heaven, and that are on earth”—yes, earth and heaven themselves; but the inhabitants are named because they are more noble than the house—”visible and invisible.” The various types of which are listed: “Whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers.” So Saint John says: “All things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made.” And, accordingly, Saint Paul applies to Him those strong words of the Psalmist: “You, Lord, in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of Your hands.”
    3. And as the true God, He is also the Supporter of all the things that He has made. He bears, upholds, sustains, all created things by the word of His power, by the same powerful word which brought them out of nothing. As this was absolutely necessary for the beginning of their existence, it is equally so for their continued existence: Were His almighty influence withdrawn, they could not subsist a moment longer. Hold up a stone in the air; the moment you withdraw your hand, it naturally falls to the ground. In the same way, were He to withdraw His hand for a moment, the entire creation would fall back into nothing.
    4. As the true God, He is likewise the Preserver of all things. He not only keeps them in being but preserves them in that degree of well-being which is suitable to their various natures. He preserves them in their various relations, connections, and dependencies, so as to compose one system of beings, to form one entire universe, according to the counsel of His will. How strongly and beautifully is this expressed: Ta panta en autoi synesteke. [By whom all things consist; or, more literally, By and in Him are all things compacted into one system.] He is not only the support, but also the cement, of the whole universe.
    5. I would particularly remark (what perhaps has not been sufficiently observed) that He is the true Author of all the motion that is in the universe. To spirits, indeed, He has given a small degree of self-moving power, but not to matter. All matter, of whatever kind it may be, is absolutely and totally inert. It does not, cannot, in any case, move itself; and whenever any part of it seems to move, it is in reality moved by something else. See that log, which, commonly speaking, moves on the sea! It is in reality moved by the water. The water is moved by the wind; that is, a current of air. And the air itself owes all its motion to the ethereal fire, a particle of which is attached to every particle of it. Deprive it of that fire, and it moves no longer; it is fixed: It is as inert as sand. Remove fluidity (owing to the ethereal fire intermixed with it) from water, and it has no more motion than the log. Infuse fire into iron, by hammering it when red hot, and it has no more motion than fixed air, or frozen water. But when it is unfixed, when it is in its most active state, what gives motion to fire? The very pagans will tell you. It is,Totam Mens agitans molem, et magno se corpore miscens. [The general soul / Lives in the parts, and agitates the whole. – Virgil, Aeneid VI, 727, 730-31]
    6. To pursue this a little farther: We say, the moon moves around the earth; the earth and the other planets move around the sun; the sun moves around its own axis. But these are only common expressions: For, if we speak the truth, neither the sun, moon, nor stars move themselves. None of these move themselves; they are all moved every moment by the almighty hand that made them.”Yes,” says Sir Isaac Newton, “the sun, moon, and all the heavenly bodies, do move, do gravitate, toward each other.” Gravitate. What is that? “Why, they all attract each other, in proportion to the quantity of matter they contain.” “Nonsense all over,” says Mr. Hutchinson; “jargon, self-contradiction! Can anything act where it is not? No; they are continually impelled toward each other.” Impelled! By what? “By the subtle matter, the ether, or electric fire.” But remember! be it ever so subtle, it is matter still: Consequently, it is as inert in itself as either sand or marble. It cannot therefore move itself; but probably it is the first material mover, the main spring whereby the Creator and Preserver of all things is pleased to move the universe.
    7. The true God is also the Redeemer of all the children of men. It pleased the Father to lay upon Him the iniquities of us all, that by the one offering of Himself, once offered, when He tasted death for every person, He might make a full and sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world.

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • I.1: “God over all, blessed for ever” / “He was with God… and was God. He and the Father are One” / “He thought it not robbery to be equal with God”: These are direct biblical quotes or allusions (Romans 9:5; John 1:1; John 10:30; Philippians 2:6), fundamental to Christ’s divinity, and are kept.
    • “Incommunicable name, JEHOVAH”: Kept, highlighting its unique divine nature.
    • “God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God: In glory equal with the Father, in majesty co-eternal”: This is a direct quote from the Nicene Creed, used to affirm Christ’s full divinity. It’s preserved for its theological weight.
    • I.2: “Only Cause, the sole Creator of all things”: Emphasizes Christ’s role in creation.
    • Colossians 1:16 / John 1:3 / Psalm 102:25-26: Direct biblical quotes applied to Christ, kept.
    • I.3: “Supporter of all the things that he hath made” / “Beareth, upholdeth, sustaineth”: Emphasizes Christ’s ongoing role in providence (Hebrews 1:3).
    • “Brought them out of nothing”: Refers to creation ex nihilo.
    • I.4: “Preserver of all things”: Distinguishes this from “supporter.”
    • Ta panta en autoi synesteke: Retained the Greek, followed by Wesley’s translation and more literal rendering, as this is a key biblical phrase (Colossians 1:17) and Wesley provides his own exegesis.
    • “Cement, of the whole universe”: A vivid metaphor for Christ’s unifying role.
    • I.5: “True Author of all the motion”: This is where Wesley gets into his specific physics/metaphysics.
    • “Matter… absolutely and totally inert”: Key philosophical point from Wesley’s era.
    • Log/Water/Wind/Ethereal fire example: The illustration is kept clear.
    • Latin quote: Totam Mens agitans molem, et magno se corpore miscens.: Retained the Latin, followed by Wesley’s own provided translation. This is from Virgil, commonly cited in this period.
    • I.6: Astronomical motion discussion (Newton vs. Hutchinson): This is a fascinating historical snapshot of scientific debate within a theological framework.
      • “Vulgar expressions”: Means common or everyday language, not necessarily crude.
      • Sir Isaac Newton’s “gravitate” and “attract”: Represented as Wesley’s understanding of Newton.
      • Mr. Hutchinson’s “Nonsense all over… jargon, self-contradiction! Can anything act where it is not? No; they are continually impelled toward each other.”: Represents the opposing view that matter cannot act at a distance. Wesley’s “impelled! by what?” leads to Hutchinson’s concept of “subtle matter, the ether, or electric fire.”
      • Wesley’s conclusion: He accepts the “first material mover” as a mechanism God uses, but maintains that ultimate motion comes from God, not from matter itself. This entire scientific/philosophical digression is retained for its historical and intellectual value within the sermon.
    • I.7: “Redeemer of all the children of men”: Shift to Christ’s redemptive role.
    • “One oblation of himself once offered, when he tasted death for every man, he might make a full and sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and satisfaction for the sins of the whole world”: This is a direct quote from the Anglican Article XXXI, emphasizing the completeness of Christ’s atonement. It’s crucial, so it’s maintained.

    8. Again: The True God is the Governor of all things: “His kingdom rules over all.” The government rests upon His shoulder throughout all ages. He is the Lord and Disposer of the whole creation, and every part of it. And in how astonishing a manner does He govern the world! How far are His ways above human thought! How little do we know of His methods of government! Only this we know: Ita praesides singulis sicut universis, et universis sicut singulis! “You preside over each creature as if it were the universe, and over the universe as over each individual creature.” Dwell a little upon this sentiment: What a glorious mystery does it contain! It is paraphrased in the words recited above:

    FATHER, how wide thy glories shine! Lord of the universe, and mine: Thy goodness watches over the whole, As all the world were but one soul; Yet keeps my every sacred hair, As I remained thy single care!

    1. Lastly, being the true God, He is the end of all things; according to that solemn declaration of the Apostle (Romans 11:36): “From Him, and through Him, and to Him, are all things.” This means: from Him, as the Creator; through Him, as the Sustainer and Preserver; and to Him, as the ultimate purpose of all things.

    II. How is Jesus Christ Eternal Life?

    1. The thing directly intended in this expression is not that He will be eternal life, although this is a great and important truth and never to be forgotten. “He is the Author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him.” He is the Purchaser of that “crown of life” which will be given to all who are “faithful unto death”; and He will be the very essence of all their joys for all the saints in glory.The flame of angelic love Is kindled at Jesus’ face; And all the enjoyment above Consists in the rapturous gaze!
    2. The thing directly intended is not that He is the resurrection, although this also is true, according to His own declaration, “I am the resurrection and the life.” Consistent with this are Saint Paul’s words: “As in Adam all died, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.” So that we may well say, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who… has begotten us again to a living hope through the resurrection of Christ from the dead, to an inheritance imperishable, undefiled, and that will not fade away.”
    3. But setting aside what He will be in the future, we are here called to consider what He is now. He is now the life of everything that lives, in any kind or degree. He is the Source of the lowest species of life, that of vegetables, as being the Source of all the motion on which vegetation depends. He is the Fountain of the life of animals; the Power by which the heart beats and the circulating fluids flow. He is the Fountain of all the life which humanity possesses in common with other animals. And if we distinguish rational life from animal life, He is the Source of this also.
    4. But how infinitely short does all this fall of the life which is here directly intended, and of which the Apostle speaks so explicitly in the preceding verses (1 John 5:11-12): “This is the testimony, that God has given us eternal life; and this life is in His Son. Whoever has the Son has life”—the eternal life spoken of here—”and whoever does not have the Son of God does not have this life.” As if he had said, “This is the summary of the testimony which God has testified concerning His Son: that God has given us not only a title to, but the real beginning of, eternal life. And this life is purchased by, and treasured up in, His Son; who has all its sources and its fullness in Himself, to communicate to His body, the Church.”

    Notes on Translation Choices and Clarifications:

    • “End of all things”: Clarified with “ultimate purpose” in parentheses to ensure the meaning is understood as Wesley intended (“purpose,” not “termination”).
    • “Of him, and through him, and to him, are all things”: Breakdown and clarification of “of,” “through,” and “to” with “Creator,” “Sustainer/Preserver,” and “ultimate purpose” to explain Wesley’s exegesis.
    • II.1: “The thing directly intended is not, that he will be eternal life”: Wesley is drawing a distinction between Christ’s future role and His present reality. This is crucial.
    • “Author of eternal salvation” / “Purchaser of that ‘crown of life’”: Kept these significant theological descriptions.
    • Poetry: The Charles Wesley hymn stanza is retained in its original form, as agreed.
    • II.2: “I am the resurrection and the life”: Direct biblical quote, kept.
    • “As in Adam all died, even so in Christ shall all be made alive”: Direct biblical quote, kept.
    • “Hath begotten us again unto a lively hope… to an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away”: Direct biblical quote (1 Peter 1:3-4), modernized “hath begotten” to “has begotten” and “fadeth not away” to “will not fade away.”
    • II.3: “Waiving what he will be hereafter”: Changed to “setting aside what He will be in the future” for more modern phrasing.
    • “Lowest species of life, that of vegetables”: Clarified by adding “that of vegetables” as a direct explanation.
    • “Circulating juices flow”: Modernized to “circulating fluids flow.”
    • II.4: “How infinitely short does all this fall of the life which is here directly intended”: Retained the emphasis on this distinction.
    • 1 John 5:11-12 quote: Kept, as it’s the core biblical support for the immediate point.
    • “Sum of the testimony which God hath testified”: Modernized to “summary of the testimony which God has testified.”
    • “Not only a title to, but the real beginning of, eternal life”: This is a vital Wesleyan emphasis on present experience, so it’s kept clear.
    • “Purchased by, and treasured up in, his Son; who has all the springs and the fullness of it in himself, to communicate to his body, the Church”: Retained the vivid imagery and theological precision of Christ as the source and dispenser of life to believers.

    II. How is He Eternal Life? (Continued)

    1. This eternal life then begins when it pleases the Father to reveal His Son in our hearts; when we first know Christ, being enabled “to call Him Lord by the Holy Spirit”; when we can testify, our conscience bearing us witness in the Holy Spirit, “the life which I now live, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.” And then it is that happiness begins—happiness real, solid, substantial. Then it is that heaven is opened in the soul, that the proper, heavenly state commences, while the love of God, as loving us, is poured out in the heart, instantly producing love for all humanity; general, pure benevolence, together with its genuine fruits: humility, meekness, patience, contentedness in every state; a complete, clear, full acceptance of the whole will of God; enabling us to “rejoice always, and in everything to give thanks.”
    2. As our knowledge and our love for Him increase, by the same degrees, and in the same proportion, the kingdom of an inward heaven must necessarily increase also; while we “grow up in all things into Him who is our Head.” And when we are en autō peplērōmenoi, “complete in Him,” as our translators render it; but more properly when we are filled with Him; when “Christ in us, the hope of glory,” is our God and our All; when He has taken full possession of our heart; when He reigns there without a rival, the Lord of every inner motion; when we dwell in Christ, and Christ in us, we are one with Christ, and Christ with us; then we are completely happy; then we live “all the life that is hidden with Christ in God”; then, and not until then, do we truly experience what that word means: “God is love; and whoever dwells in love, dwells in God, and God in him.”

    III. Inferences

    1. I have now only to add a few conclusions from the preceding observations. And we may learn from here, first, that as there is but one God in heaven above and on Earth below, so there is only one happiness for created spirits, either in heaven or on Earth. This one God made our heart for Himself; and it cannot rest until it rests in Him. It is true that while we are in the vigor of youth and health; while our blood dances in our veins; while the world smiles upon us, and we have all the conveniences, yes, and luxuries of life, we frequently have pleasing dreams and enjoy a kind of happiness. But it cannot continue; it flies away like a shadow; and even while it lasts, it is not solid or substantial; it does not satisfy the soul. We still long for something else, something we do not have. Give a person everything that this world can give, still, as Horace observed nearly two thousand years ago:Curtae nescio quid semper abest rei. Still, — Amidst our plenty something still, To me, to thee, to him is wanting! That something is neither more nor less than the knowledge and love of God; without which no spirit can be happy either in heaven or on Earth.
    2. Permit me to share my own experience, in confirmation of this: I distinctly remember that, even in my childhood, even when I was at school, I have often said, “They say the life of a schoolboy is the happiest in the world; but I am sure I am not happy; for I am not content, and so cannot be happy.” When I had lived a few years longer, being in the vigor of youth, a stranger to pain and sickness, and particularly to depression (which I do not remember to have felt for one quarter of an hour since I was born); having plenty of all things, in the midst of sensible and amiable friends who loved me, and I loved them; and being in the way of life which, of all others, suited my inclinations; still I was not happy. I wondered why I was not, and could not imagine what the reason was. The reason certainly was, I did not know God, the Source of present as well as eternal happiness. What is a clear proof that I was not then happy is that, upon the coolest reflection, I knew not one week which I would have thought it worthwhile to have lived over again, taking it with every inward and outward sensation, without any variation at all.
    3. But a pious person affirms, “When I was young, I was happy; though I was utterly without God in the world.” I do not believe you; though I doubt not but you believe yourself. But you are deceived, as I have been over and over. Such is the condition of human life!Flowerets and myrtles fragrant seem to rise: All is at distance fair; but near at hand, The gay deceit mocks the desiring eyes With thorns, and desert heath, and barren sand.Look forward at any distant prospect: How beautiful does it appear! Come up to it; and the beauty vanishes, and it is rough and disagreeable. Just so is life. But when the scene is past, it resumes its former appearance; and we seriously believe that we were then very happy, though, in reality, we were far otherwise. For as no one is now, so no one ever was, happy, without the loving knowledge of the true God.
    4. We may learn from here, secondly, that this happy knowledge of the true God is only another name for religion; I mean Christian religion; which, indeed, is the only one that deserves the name. Religion, as to its nature or essence, does not lie in this or that set of ideas, commonly called faith; nor in a routine of duties, however carefully reformed from error and superstition. It does not consist in any number of outward actions. No: it properly and directly consists in the knowledge and love of God, as manifested in the Son of His love, through the eternal Spirit. And this naturally leads to every heavenly disposition, and to every good word and work.
    5. We learn from here, thirdly, that none but a Christian is happy; none but a real, inward Christian. A glutton, a drunkard, a gambler may be merry; but he cannot be happy. The fashionable man, the fashionable woman, may eat and drink and rise up to play; but still they feel they are not happy. Men or women may adorn their own dear selves with all the colors of the rainbow. They may dance, and sing, and hurry to and fro, and flutter here and there. They may ride up and down in their splendid carriages and talk insipidly to each other. They may rush from one diversion to another: But happiness is not there. They are still “walking in a vain shadow, and disquieting themselves in vain.” One of their own poets has truly declared, concerning the entire life of these sons of pleasure,’Tis a dull farce, and empty show: Powder, and pocket-glass, and beau.I cannot but observe about that fine writer that he came near the mark, and yet fell short of it. In his “Solomon” (one of the noblest poems in the English language), he clearly shows where happiness is not; that it is not to be found in natural knowledge, in power, or in the pleasures of sense or imagination. But he does not show where it is to be found. He could not; for he did not know it himself. Yet he came near it when he said,Restore, Great Father, thy instructed son; And in my act may thy great will be done!

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • II.5: “Call him Lord by the Holy Ghost”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (1 Corinthians 12:3).
    • “Life which I now live, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Galatians 2:20).
    • “Happiness real, solid, substantial”: Kept this strong affirmation.
    • “Heaven is opened in the soul”: Kept, as it’s a powerful metaphor for spiritual experience.
    • “Love of God, as loving us, is shed abroad in the heart”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Romans 5:5).
    • “Genuine fruits, lowliness, meekness, patience, contentedness in every state; an entire, clear, full acquiescence in the whole will of God; enabling us to ‘rejoice evermore, and in everything to give thanks’”: This comprehensive list of spiritual fruits/attitudes is crucial to Wesley’s definition of happiness in God.
    • II.6: en autoi peplerOmenoi: Retained the Greek, followed by Wesley’s translation and clarification (“complete in him; but more properly when we are filled with him”). This is from Colossians 2:10.
    • “Christ in us, the hope of glory”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Colossians 1:27).
    • “Reigns therein without a rival, the Lord of every motion there”: Vivid imagery of Christ’s sovereignty within the believer.
    • “We dwell in Christ, and Christ in us, we are one with Christ, and Christ with us”: Kept as direct biblical allusion (John 15).
    • “All the life that is hid with Christ in God”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Colossians 3:3).
    • “God is love; and whosoever dwelleth in love, dwelleth in God, and God in him”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (1 John 4:16).
    • III.1: “One happiness for created spirits”: Emphasizes the singular source of true joy.
    • “Heart for himself; and it cannot rest till it resteth in him”: Kept as a classic Augustinian/Christian concept.
    • “Vigor of youth and health; while our blood dances in our veins; while the world smiles upon us”: Evocative descriptions of worldly prosperity.
    • “Conveniences, yea, and superfluities of life”: Highlights the abundance.
    • Horace Quote: Retained the Latin and Wesley’s translation. This refers to a fundamental human dissatisfaction.
    • “Knowledge and love of God”: Emphasized as the missing “something.”
    • III.2: Wesley’s Personal Anecdote: This is invaluable for illustrating his point directly from his own experience. It’s preserved with modernized phrasing for readability.
    • “Lowness of spirits”: Modernized to “depression.”
    • “Sensible and amiable friends”: Modernized to “sensible and amiable friends.”
    • “Coolest reflection”: Kept.
    • III.3: Counter-Argument and Poetic Quote: Wesley presents a common counter-argument and then uses a poetic quote to illustrate the deceptive nature of worldly happiness. The poetry is retained in its original form.
    • “Flowerets and myrtles fragrant seem to rise…”: The poetic imagery is kept.
    • III.4: Definition of True Religion: This is a core Wesleyan statement.
      • “Notions, vulgarly called faith”: Critical of mere intellectual assent.
      • “Round of duties”: Critical of mere ritual.
      • “Knowledge and love of God, as manifested in the Son of his love, through the eternal Spirit”: This is Wesley’s concise and profound definition of the essence of religion.
    • III.5: “None but a Christian is happy”: This is a bold, controversial statement by Wesley, which he proceeds to defend by critiquing superficial worldly happiness.
      • “Glutton, a drunkard, a gamester… beau, the belle”: Specific types of pleasure-seekers from his era, kept for historical flavor and clarity. “Beau, belle” clarified as “fashionable man, fashionable woman.”
      • “Walk in a vain shadow, and disquieting themselves in vain”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Psalm 39:6).
      • Poetic Quote: Retained in original form. This is likely from Edward Young’s “Night Thoughts.”
      • “Fine writer” (Edward Young): Wesley’s critique of Young (Solomon, one of his poems) for showing where happiness isn’t but not where it is, is kept.
      • “Restore, Great Father, thy instructed son; And in my act may thy great will be done!”: Kept the poetic quote.

    1. We learn from here, fourthly, that every Christian is happy; and that he who is not happy is not a Christian. If, as was observed above, religion is happiness, everyone that possesses it must be happy. This appears from the very nature of the thing: For if religion and happiness are in fact the same, it is impossible that any person can possess the former without possessing the latter also. They cannot have religion without having happiness, seeing they are utterly inseparable.And it is equally certain, on the other hand, that he who is not happy is not a Christian; seeing if he was a real Christian, he could not but be happy. But I allow an exception here in favor of those who are under violent temptation; yes, and of those who are under deep nervous disorders, which are, indeed, a type of mental illness. The clouds and darkness which then overwhelm the soul suspend its happiness; especially if Satan is permitted to second those disorders by pouring in his fiery darts. But, excepting these cases, the observation will hold, and it should be well attended to: Whoever is not happy, yes, happy in God, is not a Christian.
    2. Are you not a living proof of this? Do you not still wander to and fro, seeking rest, but finding none?—pursuing happiness, but never catching it? And who can blame you for pursuing it? It is the very purpose of your being. The great Creator made nothing to be miserable, but every creature to be happy in its kind. And upon a general review of the works of His hands, He pronounced them all “very good”—which they would not have been, had not every intelligent creature, yes, everyone capable of pleasure and pain, been happy in fulfilling the purpose of its creation. If you are now unhappy, it is because you are in an unnatural state. And should you not long for deliverance from it? “The whole creation,” being now “subject to futility,” “groans and labors in pain together.” I blame you only, or pity you rather, for taking a wrong way to a right end; for seeking happiness where it never was, and never can be, found. You seek happiness in your fellow-creatures instead of your Creator. But these can no more make you happy than they can make you immortal. If you have ears to hear, every creature cries aloud, “Happiness is not in me.” All these are, in truth, “broken cisterns, that can hold no water.” Oh, turn to your rest! Turn to Him in whom are hidden all the treasures of happiness! Turn to Him “who gives generously to all people”; and He will give you “to drink of the water of life freely.”
    3. You cannot find your long-sought happiness in all the pleasures of the world. Are they not “deceitful on the scales?” Are they not lighter than vanity itself? How long will you “feed upon that which is not bread?”—which may amuse, but cannot satisfy? You cannot find it in the religion of the world; either in opinions or a mere routine of outward duties. Vain labor! Is not God a Spirit, and therefore to be “worshipped in spirit and in truth?” In this alone can you find the happiness you seek: in the union of your spirit with the Father of spirits; in the knowledge and love of Him who is the fountain of happiness, sufficient for all the souls He has made.
    4. But where is He to be found? Shall we go up into heaven, or down into hell, to seek Him? Shall we “take the wings of the morning” and search for Him “in the uttermost parts of the sea?” No, quod petis, hic est! What a strange word to fall from the pen of a Pagan! “What you seek is here!” He is “about your bed.” He is “about your path.” He “surrounds you behind and before.” He “lays His hand upon you.” Look! God is here! not far off. Now believe and feel Him near! May He now reveal Himself in your heart! Know Him, love Him, and you are happy!
    5. Are you already happy in Him? Then see that you “hold fast to what you have attained!” “Watch and pray,” that you may never be “moved from your steadfastness.” “Look to yourselves, that you do not lose what you have gained, but that you receive a full reward.” In so doing, expect a continual growth in grace, in the loving knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. Expect that the power of the Highest shall suddenly overshadow you, that all sin may be destroyed, and nothing may remain in your heart but holiness to the Lord. And this moment, and every moment, “present yourselves a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God,” and “glorify Him with your body and with your spirit, which are God’s!”

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • III.6: “Religion is happiness”: This is a very strong and characteristic Wesleyan affirmation, kept explicitly.
    • “Utterly inseparable”: Emphasizes the strong link.
    • “Violent temptation” / “deep nervous disorders” / “species of insanity”: Wesley makes specific exceptions for severe mental and spiritual distress, which is important to retain.
    • “Fiery darts”: Kept as a direct biblical allusion (Ephesians 6:16).
    • “The observation will hold, and it should be well attended to”: Highlights the importance of his conclusion.
    • III.7: “Very end of your being”: Emphasizes the purpose of human existence.
    • “Great Creator made nothing to be miserable, but every creature to be happy in its kind”: Fundamental theological statement about God’s benevolent design.
    • “All very good”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Genesis 1:31).
    • “Unnatural state”: Refers to humanity’s fallen condition.
    • “The whole creation, being now ‘subject to vanity,’ ‘groaneth and travaileth in pain together’”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Romans 8:20, 22).
    • “Broken cisterns, that can hold no water”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Jeremiah 2:13).
    • “O turn unto your rest!”: Direct exhortation.
    • “Who giveth liberally unto all men; and he will give you ‘to drink of the water of life freely’”: Kept as direct biblical quotes/allusions (James 1:5, Revelation 21:6, 22:17).
    • III.8: “Deceitful upon the weights”: This is an older idiom for something that is lighter than it seems; modernized to “deceitful on the scales” for clarity.
    • “Feed upon that which is not bread”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Isaiah 55:2).
    • “Worshipped in spirit and in truth”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (John 4:24).
    • “Union of your spirit with the Father of spirits”: Key Wesleyan concept of spiritual communion.
    • III.9: Rhetorical Questions about seeking God: Kept to build anticipation.
    • “Take the wings of the morning” and search for him “in the uttermost parts of the sea”: Kept as direct biblical quotes/allusions (Psalm 139:9-10).
    • quod petis, hic est!: Retained the Latin, followed by Wesley’s translation “What you seek is here!” (from Virgil, Aeneid VI, 129).
    • “About your bed.” He is “about your path” He “besets you behind and before.” He “lays his hand upon you.” Lo! God is here!: Kept as direct biblical quotes/allusions (Psalm 139:3, 5).
    • “Know him, love him, And you are happy!”: A concise, powerful summary.
    • III.10: “Hold fast whereunto ye have attained!”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Revelation 3:11).
    • “Watch and pray,” that you may never be “moved from your steadfastness”: Kept as direct biblical quotes (Matthew 26:41, 2 Peter 3:17).
    • “Look unto yourselves, that ye lose not what you have gained, but that ye receive a full reward”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (2 John 1:8).
    • “Continual growth in grace, in the loving knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ”: Kept as a core Wesleyan expectation (2 Peter 3:18).
    • “Power of the Highest shall suddenly overshadow you, that all sin may be destroyed, and nothing may remain in your heart, but holiness unto the Lord”: This is a vital expression of Wesley’s expectation of entire sanctification in this life.
    • “Present yourselves a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God” / “glorify him with your body and with your spirit which are God’s!”: Kept as direct biblical quotes (Romans 12:1, 1 Corinthians 6:20).
  • John Wesley’s Sermon 6 – The Righteousness of Faith

    John Wesley’s Sermon 6 – The Righteousness of Faith

    The following sermon is translated according to my prompts by Google Gemini AI. Note that the sermon was translated in blocks, and in this case I’m choosing to include those translation notes after each block. All bolding is a reference to these notes and is not for emphasis.

    I refer to this as “translation,” but it is really simply a modernization of language.

    You can find the original sermon here.


    Sermon 6: The Righteousness of Faith

    “Moses describes the righteousness that comes from the law: ‘The person who does these things will live by them.’ But the righteousness that comes from faith speaks like this: ‘Do not say in your heart, “Who will ascend into heaven?” (that is, to bring Christ down from above); or, “Who will descend into the deep?” (that is, to bring Christ up again from the dead). But what does it say? “The word is near you, even in your mouth and in your heart”—that is, the word of faith which we preach.’” – Romans 10:5-8

    1. The Apostle Paul here is not contrasting the covenant given by Moses with the covenant given by Christ. If we ever thought that, it was because we failed to notice that both the latter and former parts of these words were spoken by Moses himself to the people of Israel, and they concerned the covenant that was already in place at that time (Deuteronomy 30:11, 12, 14). Instead, Saint Paul here is contrasting the covenant of grace—which God, through Christ, has established with humanity in all ages (both before and under the Jewish system, as well as since God was revealed in the flesh)—with the covenant of works, which was made with Adam in Paradise. This covenant of works was commonly, but mistakenly, supposed to be the only covenant God had made with humanity, especially by those Jews about whom the Apostle writes.
    2. It was of these Jews that he speaks so affectionately at the beginning of this chapter: “My heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they may be saved. For I can testify about them that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. For they, being ignorant of God’s righteousness” (meaning the justification that flows from His pure grace and mercy, freely forgiving our sins through the Son of His love, through the redemption which is in Jesus), “and seeking to establish their own righteousness” (meaning their own holiness, which they believed must come before faith in “Him who justifies the ungodly,” as the basis for their pardon and acceptance), “have not submitted themselves to the righteousness of God,” and consequently are seeking spiritual death in the error of their lives.
    3. They were ignorant that “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes“—that, by the one offering of Himself, He had brought an end to the first law or covenant (which, indeed, was not given by God to Moses, but to Adam in his state of innocence). The strict condition of that covenant, without any exceptions, was: “Do this, and live.” And, at the same time, Christ purchased for us that better covenant: “Believe, and live;” believe, and you shall be saved—now saved, both from the guilt and power of sin, and, as a consequence, from its penalty.
    4. And how many are equally ignorant today, even among those who are called by the name of Christ! How many who now have a “zeal for God,” yet do not have it “according to knowledge,” but are still seeking “to establish their own righteousness” as the basis for their pardon and acceptance? And therefore, they strongly refuse to “submit themselves to the righteousness of God!” Surely, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for you, brothers and sisters, is that you may be saved. And, to remove this major obstacle from your path, I will try to show: First, what the righteousness that comes from the law is, and what “the righteousness that comes from faith” is; Secondly, the folly of trusting in the righteousness of the law, and the wisdom of submitting to the righteousness that comes from faith.

    I. The Righteousness of the Law

    1. And, first, “the righteousness that comes from the law says, ‘The person who does these things will live by them.’” This means: Constantly and perfectly observe all these things to do them, and then you shall live forever. This law, or covenant (usually called the Covenant of Works), given by God to humanity in Paradise, required an obedience that was perfect in all its parts, complete and lacking nothing, as the condition for humanity’s eternal continuation in the holiness and happiness in which they were created.

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • Sermon Title: “The Righteousness of Faith” is kept.
    • Introductory Scripture (Romans 10:5-8): Modernized the language while retaining the key phrases “righteousness which is of the law,” “righteousness which is of faith,” and “word is nigh thee.” Clarified parenthetical explanations.
    • “Covenant given by Moses, to the covenant given by Christ”: Clarified with “by Moses” and “by Christ.”
    • “Jewish dispensation”: Modernized to “Jewish system.”
    • “God was manifest in the flesh”: Kept, as it’s a key theological phrase for the incarnation.
    • “Covenant of works, made with Adam while in Paradise”: Kept these specific theological terms.
    • “Ignorant of God’s righteousness”: Wesley’s own parenthetical explanation is crucial, so I’ve maintained it: “(meaning the justification that flows from His pure grace and mercy, freely forgiving our sins through the Son of His love, through the redemption which is in Jesus)”.
    • “Seeking to establish their own righteousness”: Again, Wesley’s parenthetical clarification is important and maintained: “(meaning their own holiness, which they believed must come before faith in ‘Him who justifies the ungodly,’ as the basis for their pardon and acceptance)”.
    • “Justifieth the ungodly”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • “Come short of the glory of God”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • “Consequences seek death in the error of their life”: Modernized slightly to “consequently are seeking spiritual death in the error of their lives.”
    • “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • “Oblation of himself once offered”: Kept as a key theological term for Christ’s sacrifice.
    • “Strict tenor thereof, without any abatement, was, ‘Do this, and live’”: Retained this precise summary of the Covenant of Works.
    • “Purchased for us that better covenant, ‘Believe, and live;’”: Emphasizes the contrast.
    • “Guilt and power of sin, and, of consequence, from the wages of it”: Key Wesleyan distinctions, maintained.
    • “Grand stumbling-block”: Modernized to “major obstacle.”
    • I.1: “Righteousness which is of the law saith, The man which doeth these things shall live by them”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • “Covenant of Works”: Maintained this theological term.
    • “Obedience perfect in all its parts, entire and wanting nothing”: Kept this emphasis on absolute perfection required by the law.

    I. The Righteousness of the Law (Continued)

    1. It required that humanity should fulfill all righteousness, inward and outward, negative and positive. This meant not only abstaining from every idle word and avoiding every evil work, but also keeping every affection, every desire, every thought, in obedience to the will of God. It required that they should continue holy, as He who had created them was holy, both in heart and in all their conduct. They were to be pure in heart, even as God is pure; perfect as their Father in heaven was perfect. They were to love the Lord their God with all their heart, with all their soul, with all their mind, and with all their strength. They were to love every soul God had made, even as God had loved them. By this universal benevolence, they were to dwell in God (who is love) and God in them. They were to serve the Lord their God with all their strength, and in all things aim solely at His glory.
    2. These were the things that the righteousness of the law required, so that whoever did them might live by them. But it further required that this complete obedience to God, this inward and outward holiness, this conformity of both heart and life to His will, should be perfect in degree. No reduction, no allowance could possibly be made for falling short in any degree, as to any tiny detail, either of the outward or the inward law. If every commandment relating to outward things was obeyed, yet that was not sufficient unless every one was obeyed with all possible strength, to the highest measure, and in the most perfect manner. Nor did it satisfy the demand of this covenant to love God with every power and faculty unless He were loved with the full capacity of each, with the whole potential of the soul.
    3. One thing more was absolutely required by the righteousness of the law, namely, that this universal obedience, this perfect holiness both of heart and life, should also be perfectly uninterrupted. It had to continue without any break, from the moment God created humanity and breathed into their nostrils the breath of life, until the days of their trial should end, and they should be confirmed in everlasting life.
    4. The righteousness, then, which is of the law, speaks in this way: “You, O person of God, stand firm in love, in the image of God in which you are made. If you wish to remain in life, keep the commandments, which are now written in your heart. Love the Lord your God with all your heart. Love, as yourself, every soul that He has made. Desire nothing but God. Aim at God in every thought, in every word and work. Do not deviate, in one motion of body or soul, from Him, your goal, and the prize of your high calling; and let all that is within you praise His holy name, every power and faculty of your soul, in every kind, in every degree, and at every moment of your existence. ‘Do this, and you shall live:’ Your light shall shine, your love shall flame more and more, until you are received up into the house of God in the heavens, to reign with Him forever and ever.”
    1. “But the righteousness that comes from faith speaks like this: ‘Do not say in your heart, “Who will ascend into heaven?” (that is, to bring Christ down from above; as though God required some impossible task for you to perform before you could be accepted) or, “Who will descend into the deep?” (that is, to bring Christ up again from the dead; as though that still needed to be done for your acceptance). But what does it say? “The word,” according to which you can now be accepted as an heir of eternal life, “is near you, even in your mouth and in your heart”—that is, the word of faith which we preach—the new covenant which God has now established with sinful humanity through Christ Jesus.’”

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • I.2: “Fulfil all righteousness, inward and outward, negative and positive”: Kept, as it’s a very precise and comprehensive description of legal righteousness.
    • “Every idle word” / “every evil work” / “every affection, every desire, every thought”: Retained for the exhaustive nature of the requirement.
    • “Holy, as he which had created him was holy, both in heart, and in all manner of conversation”: Modernized “conversation” to “conduct.”
    • “Pure in heart, even as God is pure; perfect as his Father in heaven was perfect”: Kept, as they are direct biblical echoes/commands (Matthew 5:48).
    • “Love the Lord his God with all his heart…”: Kept as direct biblical quote.
    • “Universal benevolence”: Kept, highlighting the scope of the required love for others.
    • “Dwell in God, (who is love,) and God in him”: Kept as direct biblical reference (1 John 4:16).
    • “Singly aim at his glory”: Modernized to “aim solely at His glory.”
    • I.3: “Perfect in degree”: This is a crucial point for Wesley; the law demanded perfection in quality as well as scope. Retained.
    • “No abatement, no allowance… for falling short in any degree, as to any jot or tittle”: Emphasizes the absolute nature of the demand, using biblical idiom “jot or tittle.”
    • “Full capacity of each, with the whole possibility of the soul”: Stresses the complete and utter demand.
    • I.4: “Perfectly uninterrupted”: Another key requirement of legal righteousness.
    • I.5: Summary of the law’s demand: This paragraph beautifully summarizes the law’s requirements as a direct address. I’ve modernized the language while retaining its poetic and commanding tone: “Thou, O man of God, stand fast in love, in the image of God wherein thou art made…” changed to “You, O person of God, stand firm in love, in the image of God in which you are made.” “Swerve not, in one motion of body or soul, from him, thy mark, and the prize of thy high calling” is retained as a powerful image. “This do, and thou shalt live” is the quintessential legal command.

    I. The Righteousness of the Law (Continued)

    1. By “the righteousness that comes from faith” is meant that condition for justification (and, as a result, for present and final salvation, if we endure in it to the end) which was given by God to fallen humanity through the merits and mediation of His only-begotten Son. This was partially revealed to Adam soon after his fall, being contained in the original promise made to him and his descendants concerning the Seed of the Woman, who would “crush the serpent’s head” (Genesis 3:15). It was revealed a little more clearly to Abraham by the angel of God from heaven, saying, “By Myself I have sworn, says the Lord, that in your offspring all the nations of the world will be blessed” (Genesis 12:15, 18). It was made known even more fully to Moses, to David, and to the Prophets who followed; and, through them, to many of God’s people in their respective generations. But still, most of even these individuals were ignorant of it, and very few understood it clearly. “Life and immortality” were still not “brought to light” for the Jews of old as plainly as they are now to us “by the gospel.”
    2. Now, this covenant does not say to sinful humanity, “Perform perfect obedience, and live.” If this were the term, they would gain no more benefit from all that Christ has done and suffered for them than if they were required, in order to life, to “ascend into heaven, and bring Christ down from above”; or to “descend into the deep,” into the invisible world, and “bring Christ up from the dead.” It does not require any impossible act to be done (although for mere human beings, what it requires would be impossible; but not for human beings assisted by the Spirit of God). This would only be mocking human weakness. Indeed, strictly speaking, the covenant of grace does not require us to do anything at all as absolutely and indispensably necessary in order to our justification; but only to believe in Him who, for the sake of His Son and the atonement He has made, “justifies the ungodly who does not work,” and credits their faith to them for righteousness. Even so, Abraham “believed in the Lord, and He credited it to him as righteousness” (Genesis 15:6). “And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness that comes from faith—that he might be the father of all who believe—that righteousness might be credited to them also” (Romans 4:11). “Now it was not written for his sake alone that it,” i.e., faith, “was credited to him; but also for us, to whom it shall be credited”—to whom faith shall be credited for righteousness, shall stand in the place of perfect obedience, in order to our acceptance with God—”if we believe in Him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; who was delivered” to death “for our offenses, and was raised again for our justification” (Romans 4:23-25); for the assurance of the forgiveness of our sins, and of a second life to come, to those who believe.
    3. What, then, does the covenant of forgiveness, of unmerited love, of pardoning mercy say? “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved.” On the day you believe, you shall surely live. You shall be restored to the favor of God; and in His pleasure is life. You shall be saved from the curse and from the wrath of God. You shall be brought to life from the death of sin into the life of righteousness. And if you persevere to the end, believing in Jesus, you shall never experience the second death; but, having suffered with your Lord, you shall also live and reign with Him forever and ever.
    4. Now, “this word is near you.” This condition for life is plain, easy, always accessible. “It is in your mouth, and in your heart,” through the operation of the Spirit of God. The moment “you believe in your heart” in Him whom God “has raised from the dead,” and “confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus,” as your Lord and your God, “you shall be saved” from condemnation, from the guilt and punishment of your former sins, and shall have power to serve God in true holiness all the remaining days of your life.
    5. What is the difference, then, between the “righteousness that comes from the law” and the “righteousness that comes from faith“? Between the first covenant, or the covenant of works, and the second, the covenant of grace? The essential, unchangeable difference is this: The one supposes the person to whom it is given to be already holy and happy, created in the image and enjoying the favor of God; and it prescribes the condition on which they may continue in that state of love and joy, life and immortality. The other supposes the person to whom it is given to be now unholy and unhappy, having fallen short of the glorious image of God, having the wrath of God resting on them, and hastening, through sin (by which their soul is dead), toward bodily death and everlasting death. And to humanity in this state, it prescribes the condition on which they may regain the treasure they have lost, may recover the favor and image of God, may retrieve the life of God in their soul, and be restored to the knowledge and the love of God, which is the beginning of eternal life.
    6. Again: The covenant of works, in order for humanity’s continuation in God’s favor, in His knowledge and love, in holiness and happiness, required of perfect humanity a perfect and uninterrupted obedience to every point of the law of God. Whereas, the covenant of grace, in order for humanity’s recovery of God’s favor and life, requires only faith; living faith in Him who, through God, justifies the one who did not obey.
    7. Yet, again: The covenant of works required of Adam and all his children to pay the price themselves, in consideration of which they were to receive all the future blessings of God. But, in the covenant of grace, seeing we have nothing to pay, God “freely forgives us all”: provided only that we believe in Him who has paid the price for us; who has given Himself as a “Propitiation for our sins, for the sins of the whole world.”
    8. Thus the first covenant required what is now far beyond the reach of all humanity; namely, sinless obedience, which is far from those who are “conceived and born in sin.” Whereas, the second requires what is near at hand; as though it should say, “You are sin! God is love! You by sin have fallen short of the glory of God; yet there is mercy with Him. Bring then all your sins to the pardoning God, and they shall vanish away as a cloud. If you were not ungodly, there would be no room for Him to justify you as ungodly. But now draw near, in full assurance of faith. He speaks, and it is done. Do not fear, only believe; for even the just God justifies all who believe in Jesus.”

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • Numbering Conflict: As noted, my translation numbers this section II.7 onwards to follow the preceding text from your prompt. We can adjust the final numbering of the entire sermon easily after the last section is translated.
    • “Merits and mediation”: Kept these theological terms.
    • Genesis 3:15 / Genesis 12:15, 18 / Romans 4:11, 23-25: Modernized the biblical quotes while retaining their core meaning.
    • “Unsinning obedience”: Changed to “perfect obedience” for clarity.
    • “Invisible world”: Added clarity for “the deep.”
    • “To mere man, what it requires would be impossible; but not to man assisted by the Spirit of God”: Maintained this crucial Wesleyan distinction.
    • “Justifieth the ungodly that worketh not”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion.
    • “Imputes his faith to him for righteousness”: Kept the theological term “imputes.”
    • “Stand in the stead of perfect obedience”: Kept for clarity on the legal nature of justification by faith.
    • “Frankly forgives us all”: Modernized to “freely forgives us all.”
    • “Propitiation for our sins, for the sins of the whole world”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion.
    • “Nigh at hand”: Modernized to “near at hand” or “always accessible.”
    • Romans 10:9-10 allusions: “Believe in thine heart… confessest with thy mouth… shalt be saved” are maintained as essential to the Roman 10 passage.
    • “Power to serve God in true holiness all the remaining days of thy life”: A key Wesleyan emphasis on present and ongoing sanctification.
    • I.11: Comprehensive Contrast: This paragraph is key to the entire sermon, clearly delineating the two covenants. I’ve maintained the rich theological language used to describe the fallen state and the recovery.
    • I.12 & I.13: Further Distinctions: These paragraphs reiterate and deepen the contrast, using terms like “perfect and uninterrupted obedience” vs. “only faith,” and “pay the price themselves” vs. “God ‘freely forgives us all’.”
    • I.14: Poetic Conclusion to the Section: This strong, evangelical call to faith is maintained, including the powerful rhetorical questions and direct address (“Thou art sin! God is love!”). “Just God justifieth all that believe in Jesus” is a key paradox Wesley embraces.

    II. The Folly of Trusting in the Law; The Wisdom of Faith

    1. Considering these points, it would be easy to show, as I planned to do in the second place, the folly of trusting in the “righteousness that comes from the law,” and the wisdom of submitting to “the righteousness that comes from faith.”The folly of those who still trust in the “righteousness that comes from the law”—whose terms are, “Do this, and live”—can be clearly seen from this: They start off wrong; their very first step is a fundamental mistake. For, before they can even think of claiming any blessing on the terms of this covenant, they must assume they are in the same state as the one with whom this covenant was made. But how foolish an assumption this is, since it was made with Adam in a state of innocence! How weak, therefore, must that whole structure be which stands on such a foundation! And how foolish are those who thus build on the sand! They seem never to have considered that the covenant of works was not given to humanity when they were “dead in trespasses and sins,” but when they were alive to God, when they knew no sin, but were holy as God is holy. They forget that it was never designed for the recovery of God’s favor and life once lost, but only for the continuation and increase thereof, until it should be complete in eternal life.
    2. Nor do those who are thus trying to establish their “own righteousness, which is of the law,” consider the kind of obedience or righteousness that the law absolutely requires. It must be perfect and complete in every point, or it does not meet the law’s demands. But which of you is able to perform such obedience, or, consequently, to live by it? Who among you fulfills every tiny detail, even of the outward commandments of God? Doing nothing, great or small, which God forbids? Leaving nothing undone which He commands? Speaking no idle word? Always having your conversation “fitting to give grace to those who hear”? And, “whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, doing everything to the glory of God?” And how much less are you able to fulfill all the inward commandments of God!—those which require that every disposition and motion of your soul should be holiness to the Lord! Are you able to “love God with all your heart”? To love all humanity as your own soul? To “pray without ceasing”? “In everything to give thanks”? To have God always before you? And to keep every affection, desire, and thought in obedience to His law?
    3. You should further consider that the righteousness of the law requires not only obeying every command of God—negative and positive, internal and external—but also doing so in the perfect degree. In every instance whatever, the voice of the law is, “You shall serve the Lord your God with all your strength.” It allows no reduction of any kind. It excuses no defect. It condemns every falling short of the full measure of obedience, and immediately pronounces a curse on the offender. It regards only the unchanging rules of justice, and says, “I know not how to show mercy.”
    4. Who then can appear before such a Judge, who is “strict in marking what is done wrong?” How foolish are those who desire to be tried at the judgment bar where “no living person can be justified!”—none of Adam’s offspring. For, suppose we did now keep every commandment with all our strength; yet one single breach that ever occurred completely destroys our whole claim to life. If we have ever offended in any one point, this righteousness is at an end. For the law condemns all who do not perform uninterrupted as well as perfect obedience. So that, according to its sentence, for someone who has once sinned, in any degree, “there remains only a fearful expectation of fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries” of God.
    5. Is it not then the very height of folly for fallen humanity to seek life by this righteousness?—for humanity, who was “shaped in wickedness, and in sin did his mother conceive him?” For humanity, who is, by nature, entirely “earthly, sensual, devilish;” “altogether corrupt and abominable;” in whom, until they find grace, “dwells no good thing;” indeed, who cannot of themselves think one good thought; who is truly all sin, a mere lump of ungodliness, and who commits sin with every breath they draw; whose actual transgressions, in word and deed, are more numerous than the hairs of their head? What stupidity, what senselessness must it be for such an unclean, guilty, helpless creature as this to dream of seeking acceptance by their own righteousness, of living by “the righteousness that comes from the law!”
    6. Now, whatsoever considerations prove the folly of trusting in the “righteousness that comes from the law,” prove equally the wisdom of submitting to the “righteousness that comes from God by faith.” This would be easy to show with regard to each of the preceding considerations. But, to set this aside for a moment, the wisdom of the first step toward this—the disclaiming our own righteousness—plainly appears from this: that it is acting according to truth, to the real nature of things. For, what is it more than to acknowledge, with our heart as well as lips, the true state in which we are? To acknowledge that we bring with us into the world a corrupt, sinful nature; indeed, more corrupt than we can easily conceive, or find words to express? That by this, we are prone to all that is evil and averse from all that is good; that we are full of pride, self-will, unruly passions, foolish desires, vile and unrestrained affections; lovers of the world, lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God? That our lives have been no better than our hearts, but many ways ungodly and unholy; so much so that our actual sins, both in word and deed, have been as countless as the stars of heaven? That, on all these accounts, we are displeasing to Him who is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity, and deserve nothing from Him but indignation and wrath and death, the just wages of sin? That we cannot, by any of our righteousness (for indeed we have none at all), nor by any of our works (for they are like the tree upon which they grow), appease the wrath of God or avert the punishment we have justly deserved? Yes, that, if left to ourselves, we shall only grow worse and worse, sink deeper and deeper into sin, offend God more and more, both with our evil works and with the evil dispositions of our carnal mind, until we fill up the measure of our iniquities and bring upon ourselves swift destruction? And is not this the very state in which we are by nature? To acknowledge this, then, both with our heart and lips—that is, to disclaim our own righteousness, “the righteousness that comes from the law”—is to act according to the real nature of things, and, consequently, is an instance of true wisdom.

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • Numbering: I’ve kept the Roman numeral II.1 and subsequent Arabic numbering as they appear in your provided text for now. We can harmonize the full sermon’s numbering later.
    • II.1: “Abundantly appear from hence”: Modernized to “can be clearly seen from this.”
    • “They set out wrong; their very first step is a fundamental mistake”: Kept, as it’s a strong, clear statement.
    • “Vain a supposition”: Modernized to “foolish an assumption.”
    • “Building be, which stands on such a foundation”: Kept the metaphor.
    • “Dead in trespasses and sins”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • II.2: “What manner of obedience or righteousness that is which the law indispensably requires”: Modernized to “kind of obedience or righteousness that the law absolutely requires.”
    • “Every jot and tittle”: Kept as a direct biblical idiom (Matthew 5:18).
    • “Meet to minister grace to the hearers”: Modernized to “fitting to give grace to those who hear” (Ephesians 4:29).
    • “Whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, doing all to the glory of God”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (1 Corinthians 10:31).
    • “Every temper and motion of your soul should be holiness unto the Lord”: Kept, as it’s a powerful description of inward holiness.
    • “Love God with all your heart…” / “pray without ceasing” / “in every thing to give thanks”: Kept as direct biblical quotes/commands.
    • II.3: “Perfect degree”: Emphasizes the law’s absolute standard.
    • “Thou shalt serve the Lord thy God with all thy strength”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • “Coming short of the full measure of obedience”: Kept, conveying the concept of failing to meet the standard.
    • “I know not to show mercy”: A strong personification of the law’s strictness.
    • II.4: “Extreme to mark what is done amiss”: Modernized to “strict in marking what is done wrong.”
    • “No flesh living can be justified”: Kept as a direct biblical quote.
    • “One single breach which ever was, utterly destroys our whole claim to life”: This is a critical point about the law’s indivisible demand.
    • “Fearful looking for of fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Hebrews 10:27).
    • II.5: “Very foolishness of folly”: Kept this emphatic phrase.
    • “Shapen in wickedness, and in sin did his mother conceive him”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Psalm 51:5).
    • “Earthly, sensual, devilish”: Kept as direct biblical quote (James 3:15).
    • “Altogether corrupt and abominable”: Kept this strong language about fallen human nature.
    • “Dwellth no good thing”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Romans 7:18).
    • “Mere lump of ungodliness”: Kept this vivid, strong metaphor.
    • II.6: Transition to “Wisdom of submitting to the righteousness which is of God by faith”: This paragraph marks the significant pivot of the sermon.
    • “Disclaiming our own righteousness”: A key action in Wesley’s understanding of justification.
    • Comprehensive Description of Fallen State: The long list of human sinfulness (“corrupt, sinful nature,” “prone to all that is evil,” “pride, self-will,” “lovers of the world,” “ungodly and unholy,” “actual sins… as the stars of heaven for multitude,” “displeasing to Him… deserve nothing but indignation and wrath and death”) is kept to fully convey Wesley’s view of humanity’s natural state, making the subsequent embrace of faith all the more reasonable.
    • “Purer eyes than to behold iniquity”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Habakkuk 1:13).
    • “Wax worse and worse, sink deeper and deeper into sin”: Kept this vivid image of continued decline.

    II. The Folly of Trusting in the Law; The Wisdom of Faith (Continued)

    1. The wisdom of submitting to “the righteousness that comes from faith” appears further from this consideration: that it is the righteousness of God. I mean here, it is that method of reconciliation with God which has been chosen and established by God Himself—not only as He is the God of wisdom, but as He is the sovereign Lord of heaven and earth, and of every creature He has made. Now, as it is not fitting for humanity to say to God, “What are You doing?”—as no one who is not utterly devoid of understanding will contend with One who is mightier than they, with Him whose kingdom rules over all—so it is true wisdom, it is a mark of sound understanding, to accept whatever He has chosen; to say in this, as in all things, “It is the Lord: Let Him do what seems good to Him.”
    2. It may be further considered that it was out of pure grace, of free love, of undeserved mercy, that God has granted sinful humanity any way of reconciliation with Himself—that we were not cut off from His hand and utterly erased from His remembrance. Therefore, whatever method He is pleased to appoint, out of His tender mercy, out of His undeserved goodness, whereby His enemies—who have so deeply revolted from Him, so long and obstinately rebelled against Him—may still find favor in His sight, it is doubtless our wisdom to accept it with all thankfulness.
    3. To mention just one more consideration. It is wisdom to aim at the best goal by the best means. Now, the best goal any creature can pursue is happiness in God. And the best goal a fallen creature can pursue is the recovery of the favor and image of God. But the best, indeed the only, means under heaven given to a person, by which they may regain the favor of God (which is better than life itself) or the image of God (which is the true life of the soul), is submitting to the “righteousness that comes from faith”—believing in the only-begotten Son of God.

    III. An Exhortation to the Sinner

    1. Therefore, whoever you are, who desires to be forgiven and reconciled to the favor of God, do not say in your heart, “I must first do this; I must first conquer every sin; break off every evil word and work, and do all good to all people; or, I must first go to church, receive the Lord’s Supper, hear more sermons, and say more prayers.” Alas, my brother or sister! You are completely off track. You are still “ignorant of the righteousness of God,” and are “seeking to establish your own righteousness,” as the basis of your reconciliation. Do you not know that you can do nothing but sin until you are reconciled to God? Why, then, do you say, “I must do this and this first, and then I shall believe?” No, but first believe! Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, the Atonement for your sins. Let this good foundation first be laid, and then you shall do all things well.
    2. Neither say in your heart, “I cannot be accepted yet, because I am not good enough.” Who is good enough—who ever was—to deserve acceptance at God’s hands? Was any child of Adam ever good enough for this? Or will any be until the consummation of all things? And as for you, you are not good at all: “There dwells in you no good thing.” And you never will be, until you believe in Jesus. Rather, you will find yourself getting worse and worse. But is there any need of being worse in order to be accepted? Are you not bad enough already? Indeed you are, and God knows that. And you yourself cannot deny it. Then delay not. All things are now ready. “Arise, and wash away your sins.” The fountain is open. Now is the time to wash yourself white in the blood of the Lamb. Now He shall “cleanse” you as “with hyssop,” and you shall “be clean”: He shall “wash” you, and you shall “be whiter than snow.”
    3. Do not say, “But I am not contrite enough: I am not sensible enough of my sins.” I know it. I wish to God you were more aware of them, a thousand times more broken-hearted than you are. But do not wait for this. It may be that God will make you so, not before you believe, but by believing. It may be, you will not weep much until you love much because you have had much forgiven. In the meantime, look to Jesus. Behold, how He loves you! What more could He have done for you that He has not done?O Lamb of God, was ever pain, Was ever love like Thine?Look steadily upon Him, until He looks on you and breaks your hard heart. Then shall your “head” be “waters,” and your “eyes fountains of tears.”

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • Numbering: I’ve kept the Roman numeral II and III as they appear in your text, and the Arabic numbering within them. We will need to reconcile the full sermon’s numbering in a final pass.
    • II.7: “Meet for man to say unto God, ‘What doest thou?’”: Modernized to “fitting for humanity to say to God, ‘What are You doing?’” (referencing Romans 9:20).
    • “Utterly void of understanding”: Modernized to “utterly devoid of understanding.”
    • “Contend with One that is mightier than he”: Modernized to “contend with One who is mightier than they.”
    • “Acquiesce in whatever he hath chosen”: Modernized to “accept whatever He has chosen.”
    • “It is the Lord: Let him do what seemeth him good”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (1 Samuel 3:18).
    • II.8: “Vouchsafed to sinful man any way of reconciliation”: Modernized to “granted sinful humanity any way of reconciliation.”
    • “Cut away from his hand, and utterly blotted out of his remembrance”: Kept the strong imagery.
    • “Revolted from him, so long and obstinately rebelled against him”: Kept, emphasizing the severity of sin.
    • II.9: “Aim at the best end by the best means”: Kept, as it’s a clear maxim.
    • “Recovery of the favour and image of God”: Key Wesleyan concept, kept.
    • “Better than life itself”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Psalm 63:3).
    • III.1: Exhortation’s Direct Address: Wesley’s direct address (“thou art clean gone out of the way,” “alas, my brother!”) is maintained, changing “thou/thy” to “you/your” for readability while preserving the intimate, urgent tone.
    • “Ignorant of the righteousness of God” / “seeking to establish thy own righteousness”: Kept as direct biblical quotes (Romans 10:3).
    • “Thou canst do nothing but sin, till thou art reconciled to God”: A very strong Wesleyan statement on natural inability.
    • “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, the Propitiation for thy sins”: Kept this core evangelical command and title for Christ.
    • III.2: “Not good enough”: Addresses a common spiritual struggle directly.
    • “Consummation of all things”: Kept as a theological term.
    • “There dwelleth in thee no good thing”: Kept as a direct biblical quote (Romans 7:18).
    • “Arise, and wash away thy sins” / “fountain is open” / “wash thee white in the blood of the Lamb” / “purge thee as with hyssop” / “be clean” / “wash thee, and thou shalt be whiter than snow”: These are powerful biblical allusions (Acts 22:16, Zechariah 13:1, Psalm 51:7) kept for their imagery and theological weight.
    • III.3: “Contrite enough” / “sensible enough of my sins”: Addresses a common misconception about the prerequisite for faith.
    • “Not before thou believest, but by believing”: A crucial Wesleyan emphasis on the relationship between faith and repentance/conviction.
    • Poetry: The Charles Wesley hymn stanza is retained in its original form.
    • “Head” be “waters,” and thy “eyes fountains of tears”: Kept as direct biblical allusion (Jeremiah 9:1).

    III. An Exhortation to the Sinner (Conclusion)

    1. To conclude. Whoever you are, O person, who has the sentence of death within yourself, who feels yourself a condemned sinner, and has the wrath of God resting on you: To you the Lord says, not, “Do this,”—perfectly obey all My commands—“and live;” but, “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved.” “The word of faith is near you:” Now, at this instant, in the present moment, and in your present state, sinner as you are, just as you are, believe the gospel; and “I will be merciful to your unrighteousness, and your iniquities I will remember no more.”

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • “Whosoever thou art, O man, who hast the sentence of death in thyself, who feelest thyself a condemned sinner, and hast the wrath of God abiding on thee”: This powerful, direct address is maintained, with “thou/thy” updated to “you/your” for readability while preserving the urgency and personal nature of the appeal.
    • “Do this,” — perfectly obey all my commands, — “and live”: Retained to emphasize the Law’s impossible demand.
    • “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved”: Kept as the core evangelical command.
    • “The word of faith is nigh unto thee”: Modernized to “near you.”
    • “Now, at this instant, in the present moment, and in thy present state, sinner as thou art, just as thou art, believe the gospel”: This emphasizes the immediacy and unconditional nature of the call to faith, a hallmark of Wesley’s preaching on justification. This is a very critical part.
    • “I will be merciful unto thy unrighteousness, and thy iniquities will I remember no more”: Kept as a direct biblical quote/allusion (Hebrews 8:12), signifying the promise of complete forgiveness.
  • The What-About Lifestyle

    The What-About Lifestyle

    Especially in political discussions we frequently here something like “but what about,” followed by a misdeed of the folks on the other side. In turn, we hear complaints about “what-about-ism,” which tends to annoy people on the other side, whichever other side that may be.

    This is not, as you might think, a preface to a political post. Rather, I have found myself asking just where this “what-about” approach comes from. And as I thought about it, I almost immediately realized that this is a lifestyle. Not a rare one either!

    Whether it’s in our personal lives, our work, or in our ministries, we have this tendency to look down the road, across the aisle, or over there somewhere, and we find someone or some organization that we can put in the “what-about” position.

    “My church is not doing well. But it’s doing better than that church down the road.”

    “My language is inappropriate sometimes, but not as often as _____’s.”

    “I’m occasionally rude, but there are others much more rude than I am.”

    “My church is really quite mission oriented. Well, more mission oriented than most churches in our area/denomination/conference.”

    We usually talk about judging and Matthew 7:1 as a command not to hurt other people. That’s not a bad lesson. We shouldn’t be judgmental. (I’m only a little judgmental, much less judgmental than several people I could name!) But there’s another point here. When we start living by judging other people, we start deteriorating ourselves.

    Paul said something about this:

    We do not dare to classify or compare ourselves with some of those who commend themselves. But when they measure themselves by one another and compare themselves with one another, they do not show good sense.

    2 Corinthians 10:12 (NRSVue)

    Many feel that if we aren’t vigorously judgmental, people will feel that they can slack off. They’ll do worse. But because the only standards we can achieve are fallible human ones, this judgmental approach actually achieves the opposite effect. There are some who become discouraged on being judged and give up. But there are many who, expecting judgment, carefully blunt the standards to make themselves look good.

    One key way of blunting the standards is to point at someone else.

    The northern Kingdom of Israel demonstrated this. It’s interesting to read the judgments given of the kings. Kings are generally judged to the first king of the northern kingdom, Jeroboam I. Later kings are either more evil than he was or evil, but not as much. The general standard is that they kept on repeating the sins of Jeroboam I.

    What strikes me about this sequence is the final king, Hoshea.

    In the twelfth year of King Ahaz of Judah, Hoshea son of Elah began to reign in Samaria over Israel; he reigned nine years. 2 He did what was evil in the sight of the Lord, yet not like the kings of Israel who were before him.

    2 Kings 17:1-2 (NRSVue)

    He did evil, but he wasn’t as bad as his predecessors. And Samaria fell and the northern tribes went into exile in his reign.

    Hoshea could have said, “What about Ahab? He got to complete his reign!”

    [L]ooking to Jesus, the pioneer and perfecter of faith….

    Hebrews 12:2 (NRSVue)

    Put your eyes on the right standard. Better, let Him draw them.


    Some years ago I did a short presentation on this, which I titled “The Sin of Jeroboam.” Video here is kind of ancient, so bear with it!

  • God as Father

    God as Father

    I intended to schedule this post for Sunday morning, but life intervened. Jody suggested that as my final post for Father’s Day Week, I should look at divine fatherhood overall through scripture.

    She had some difficulty with the concept of God as father, because while she and her father were able to reconcile before his death, she had difficulty thinking of her relationship to Father-God in a positive way. Many people have that very problem due to the way they related to their own fathers in this life.

    And we can expect that any human representative is going to present an imperfect and challenging representation of God. This is an inevitable result of the human condition. When Jesus told people that they knew how to give good gifts to their children, he doubtless knew that there were people in the crowd who truly did not know how to give good gifts. There were likely people who didn’t know how to give at all because they were so self centered.

    But that parental relationship is still a valuable analogy. This works two ways. First, parental love and commitment to children provides one of our better examples of a loving, self-sacrificing commitment. When I talk about good and bad parents, readers have no problem thinking of examples. We may differ on were the boundaries lie, but we do have an image of good parents.

    Second, this works in reverse. We are told in this way that as parents, we are to be the sort of parents who can point the way to God. Being “godly” as a parent doesn’t mean adhering to a set of doctrinal standards. It means having a particular attitude.

    My own observation over the years is that children do well with quite a variety of parents. One critical common characteristics of parents I believe would be called “good” by their children later in life is simply that those parents cared. They were committed to doing right. They may have failed. No, they almost certainly did from time to time. They weren’t perfect, but they tried.

    And so Jesus could point to the idea of a good father as a way to point to God, and people can get an idea of what God’s love means.

    The best way to discover some depth in this view of God is to look at the experience of people with God. I frequently refer to the Bible not as a compendium of doctrine, but as a book of experience. That experience is primarily the experience of people with God.

    Jody spent a year looking at texts about God the Father. I’d suggest just such a project if you want to build your relationship with God. Here are a few key points.

    • God as creator is God as Father. At creation God not only produces human beings, God then goes on to care for them by providing a garden, animals, and companionship.
    • God is not eternally indulgent. God is patient, but there comes a time for trouble. Witness repeated failures of the people, and events such as the flood, slavery in Egypt, the exile, and so forth.
    • God’s parental love is not determined by our being the cutest or best behaved children. Hosea, particularly the first few verses of Hosea 11 or all of Ezekiel 16 (which is some rather rough reading!) emphasize.
    • God’s love is not limited, as seen in John 16 & 17 and many other passages. God keeps loving right up through death on the cross.
    • God’s love is relentless. See Romans 8:31-39.
    • God’s love will win in the end. See Revelation 21 & 22.

    We spend our time worrying about the little things. God’s love is the big thing.

    God is Love!

    (Featured image generated by Jetpack AI.)

  • Joseph Husband of Mary

    Joseph Husband of Mary

    I’ve been using texts or subjects that Jody suggests to me this week, all dealing in some way with fathers. Today, again, I’m not going to provide the text here, as it’s a bit long. My suggested reading is Matthew 1:16-24 & Luke 3:21-23.

    “[T]he son, as people thought, of Joseph.” That’s the relationship note in Luke for Joseph as the earthly father of Jesus. We’re not told a great deal about Joseph, and we might take something negative from this lack of mention. But I think the clearest thing we hear is quite critical. “When he woke Joseph did as the angel of the Lord had directed him” (Matthew 1:24a). There’s your testimony about Joseph.

    Some years ago there was a big flurry of publications and teaching about a simple prayer, just one verse, in 1 Chronicles 4:10. It’s called the prayer of Jabez. It deals with widening our territory, and having God’s hand with us. It has been extremely popular.

    Now other than being promoted well out of context and out of proportion, I have nothing against the prayer of Jabez. It’s a good one for certain occasions. I don’t think this particular prayer is the solution to nearly as many things as people claimed, but it’s good. On the other hand, for many people it became the prayer of prosperity, the request for God to make the one praying important and successful. As such, one can get out of balance with it.

    But here’s another line. Joseph receives instructions in a dream, and when he wakes up, he does what he was told to do. It might be nice for that to become true of all of us. When God speaks, we listen.

    You see, this is the opposite of what we usually do. “Oh Lord,” we say, “hear our prayer.” That’s good. We want the Lord to hear our prayers, but it’s much more important for us to hear God’s message, God’s call, to us. That’s when things can really happen.

    I don’t mean that we’ll suddenly get God to love us more. God loves us. But when we can take any steps in God’s will, the results will be good. We’re regularly asking God to be with us. It would be better for us to ask God to help us be with Him! That’s the good place.

    The Power of Obedience cover image
    Want to learn more?

    After Jesus is born, Joseph has another dream telling him to go to Egypt. And what is the response? “So Joseph got up, took mother and child by night, and sought refuge with them in Egypt” (Matthew 2:14). Again, here goes Joseph, following God’s directions.

    There’s a power in this approach to life. It’s not about demanding that God make us successful, but rather about listening and doing what God tells us to do. Not so that God will accept us or love us, but because God has accepted us and already loves us. And because of that acceptance and love, God has the best plans for us.

    I wonder what would happen if we took that one line about Joseph to heart as much as, or even more than, the prayer of Jabez. Joseph did as the angel of the Lord had directed him.

    Will you?

  • Luke 15:11-32 – The Prodigal

    Luke 15:11-32 – The Prodigal

    I’m not going to provide my own translation or paste the text from another one here today, as the passage is long, but I’d strongly suggest re-reading the story before you continue. Read it carefully.

    This parable is often called the parable of the prodigal son. Many commentators, however, have considered it much more about the prodigal father, in the sense of a father who was lavish and extravagant about his love and generosity. This latter view is not bad as the meaning of the parable.

    I’d like to suggest, however, that we can look at this parable in more than one way, and the meaning shifts as we do so.

    The first view is one that I heard many times before. The prodigal son has done many horrible things in his life, and finds himself at rock bottom. From that final landing place he manages to grasp just a little bit of hope. Maybe, he thinks, I can persuade my father to take me back as an employee. The lesson of the story seen from this point of view is that you should be willing to repent and come home, and the Lord will accept you.

    Not bad. Even true.

    But the next view is that this is the story of the father, a father who always loved his son, who gave him early access to his inheritance, and waited for his return as long as he was away from home. We can gather that he lived with this hope because he sees that son returning from a long way off and comes to welcome him. From this point of view, this is the story of the father’s grace, love, and willingness to accept the returning wanderer.

    Even better. Also true.

    But the third point of view is the other brother, the good brother, the one who stayed home and worked hard and thought he was pleasing his father. He’s satisfied with is goodness and believes his father owes him respect for his diligence in keeping the family business going and providing support for his father in his old age.

    Not very nice. But very true.

    Contrary to the way many read this story, I actually think the older son is the target. You see, I am the older son. Yes, I’ve done some wandering, but not as much as other people I know. In fact, I lived a quite respectable and productive life while I was out of the church. When I came back, I was ready to start teaching the Bible and diligently doing God’s work.

    I had to return, but not from a far country. Just from a little ways down the road. And yes, the father was there waiting for me. I was a respectable wanderer who returned in good time and was able to put what I learned in the meantime into God’s work. Many said it was part of God’s plan, that God had been preparing me to work.

    So now I can look at people who have wandered far from God. They’ve gone off and become addicts, criminals, God-haters. They’ve really hurt my heavenly Father. They’re the bad people who need real redemption and not just a little adjustment to their lives.

    But you know what happens? When they show up, the angel choirs break into hallelujahs. God welcomes them into his arms. There is great rejoicing over this one sinner who repents. Even, no, especially, the ones who fell the farthest, who behaved most despicably, who were the least respectable in human terms.

    And yet … there’s the father waiting, watching, jumping up joyfully, welcoming, feasting.

    And I’m left to keep on trying to do everything the father wants me to do. Why don’t I get the reward that I think I ought to get?

    It’s actually very simple. Even when I make the story about me, the older brother, it’s still God’s story. It’s still about the Father whose grace reaches everyone and who’s holiness is so far above that if I were to concentrate on it, I wouldn’t be so incredibly foolish as to try to compare my accomplishments to those of my wandering brethren. We all need to come into the Father’s care and receive the Father’s grace. None of us have anything of our own to bring.

    The story becomes also an invitation to let God take us to the place where we don’t feel superior to the returning prodigal, no matter how long he has wallowed with the pigs, or how much money and life he has squandered.

    In fact, the pig sty is closer to the Father than the management office on the Father’s farm.

    If you are living in that place of service, and waiting for your reward, and wondering why others you think are less worthy than you seem to cause all the rejoicing, consider saying this: “Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you, and am no longer worthy to be called your son.” He’ll interrupt you. You won’t get any further. Because he has been calling you his son all along.

    He’ll rejoice that you finally realized it.

  • Luke 11:9-13 – Giving

    Luke 11:9-13 – Giving

    9 And I say to you, “Ask, and it will be given to you, seek and you will find, knock, and the door will be opened to you. 10 For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and the the door is opened to the one who knocks. 11 Which father among you would give a snake to his son when asked for a fish? 12 Or if he asks for an egg, would give him a scorpion? 13 So if you, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him?

    Luke 11:9-13 (my translation)

    One question that regularly arises out of this story is simply this: Will God just give us anything we ask for? We should find an answer to this by simply reversing the question. Which father, if his son asked for a serpent, would actually give that son a serpent? There is an assumption behind the story that the son is seeking good things and the father is giving those good things. The question arises more with the passage in Matthew 7:7-11, where, instead of the Holy Spirit, our Father in Heaven is said to give “good things” to those who ask.

    Luke’s focus is specifically on the Spirit and spiritual things, but the principles remains the same. A good father would not only provide good and appropriate gifts, he would also avoid dangerous gifts. A good father cares for the child who is asking and is not just a slot machine in the sky, prepared to rain whatever is asked on those asking.

    Now this might be seen as narrowing or tightening the passage. I would say rather that it’s putting passage into it’s own logical context, or rather recognizing what type of a story it is. It’s a story about desire on the one hand and care on the other. And within that care is also a story of respect, of seeing the person.

    This passage could say, “Don’t bother asking, because God already knows what you need and will surely take care of you.” But it doesn’t. It says ask, seek, knock.

    If God is on the other side of the door, why do I have to knock. Why doesn’t God show me the door and encourage me to go through it?

    God treats us as persons. God made us as persons. God recognizes our own being.

    “Behold I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens te door, I will go in to him and will eat with him and he with me” (Revelation 3:20). Wow! Courteous God! But it’s not courtesy. It’s actual caring. I’d like to be your friend, companion. I’d like you to be part of my community, represented by sharing a meal. But I’m going to wait until you open the door.

    Think of the power on either side of that door. God the creator on the outside. Created being, totally dependent on that power on the other, and the one with all the power is waiting on the one without for permission. It’s our Luke 11 story turned inside out. But it tells the same story about the nature of our heavenly parent who is raising us up as his children.

    Many fathers hope for their children to be what they, the parents, planned those children to be. They have a plan for their children’s lives and they’ll manipulate them with all their power to become just what their parents would like them to be.

    Then there are those fathers–it is the week leading to Fathers’ Day!–who simply want their children to be whatever they choose to be and do that well.

    There are those who think that free choice diminishes God’s sovereignty. I don’t agree. I see the ultimate real power in a God who could force everything, but instead says, “If you want it ask.” “If you want in, knock.” I’m powerful enough to be unthreatened by treating you as a real person, one with desires, joys and sorrows, strengths and weaknesses.

    “I’m not threatened because I also choose to be the person who responds. You can’t make me, but I will.” So speaks the creator of everything from subatomic particles to galaxies.

    “I’m your good Father.”

  • John Wesley – Sermon 44 – Original Sin

    John Wesley – Sermon 44 – Original Sin

    The following is a translation into modern English of John Wesley’s Sermon 44, “Original Sin.” The link is to the 1872 edition as posted on ResourceUMC.org. This translation was produced to my specifications by Gemini AI. I am including as footnotes the AI notes on the translation. My instructions were to modernize the language and on a scale of 1 to 10 for literal to free translation aim for about a 5 to 6.

    Whatever of these I happen to produce I intend to leave public domain and make fully available online. I may create an ebook or a PDF if I do enough of them this way. Comments on the accuracy of the translation are welcome. The AI provided a list of substantive changes after each section (varying from 4 to 7 numbered paragraphs) except for section 2, which I’m providing as footnotes. Again, per my instructions, the AI also updated the language of the scripture quotes except where the specific language was critical. I did not change these to a modern version, but rather allowed rephrasing of the KJV or of Wesley’s rendering.

    I have briefly checked this and did not find anything major. I’d appreciate any corrections.


    Modern Translation (Wesley, “Original Sin,” Sermon 44

    “God saw how great man’s wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time.”

    Genesis 6:5

    1. How different this is from the flattering portrayals of human nature that people have drawn throughout history! Many ancient writings are full of cheerful descriptions of human dignity. Some ancient thinkers depicted humans as having all virtue and happiness built into them, or at least entirely within their grasp, without needing help from any other being. In fact, they presented humans as self-sufficient, capable of living independently, and only a little less than God Himself.
    2. And it’s not just non-Christian thinkers, those guided by little more than the dim light of reason, who have spoken so grandly about human nature as if it were pure innocence and perfection. Many who claim the name of Christ, and to whom God’s own revelations were entrusted, have also done this. Such accounts have been particularly common in the present century, and perhaps nowhere more than in our own country. Here, quite a few highly intelligent and learned individuals have used their best efforts to show what they called “the fair side of human nature.” And it must be admitted that, if their descriptions are accurate, humanity is indeed still “a little lower than the angels”; or, as the words can be more literally translated, “a little less than God.”
    3. Is it any wonder that these ideas are so easily accepted by most people? After all, who isn’t readily convinced to think favorably of themselves? Consequently, writers of this type are widely read, admired, and praised. They’ve made countless converts, not only among the general public but also in academic circles. So, it’s now completely out of fashion to speak differently, to say anything that disparages human nature. It’s generally agreed that, despite a few minor weaknesses, human nature is fundamentally innocent, wise, and virtuous!
    4. But, in the meantime, what are we to do with our Bibles? They will never agree with this view. These popular ideas, however appealing they may be, are utterly incompatible with what Scripture says. The Bible states that “through one man’s disobedience all men were made sinners”; that “in Adam all died”—meaning they died spiritually, losing the life and image of God. It says that fallen, sinful Adam then “fathered a son in his own likeness”—and it was impossible for him to do otherwise, for “who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean?” As a result, we, like all other people, were by nature “dead in trespasses and sins,” “without hope, without God in the world,” and therefore “children of wrath.” Every person can say, “I was shaped in wickedness, and in sin did my mother conceive me.” There is “no difference,” in that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” that glorious image of God in which humanity was originally created. And so, when “the Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, he saw they had all gone astray; they had together become corrupt, there was no one righteous, no, not one”—none who truly sought after God. This aligns perfectly with what the Holy Spirit declares in the words quoted above: “God saw,” when He looked down from heaven before, “that the wickedness of man was great in the earth”; so great that “every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”

    This is God’s assessment of humanity. From this, I will first show what people were like before the flood; second, inquire whether they are not the same now; and third, add some conclusions.1

    Humanity Before the Flood

    I. 1. First, by examining the words of our text, I will describe what people were like before the flood. We can fully trust the description given here, because God saw it, and God cannot be mistaken. He “saw that the wickedness of man was great“—not just the wickedness of this or that person, nor just a few, nor even merely the majority, but of humanity in general; of people universally. The word “man” here includes the entire human race, everyone who shares human nature. It’s difficult for us to even estimate their numbers—how many thousands and millions there were. The Earth at that time still had much of its original beauty and incredible fertility. The globe’s surface wasn’t damaged and torn as it is now, and spring and summer seemed to blend together. So, it’s likely the Earth could support far more inhabitants than it can today. And these inhabitants must have multiplied immensely, as people had sons and daughters for seven or eight hundred years straight. Yet, among all this unimaginable number, only “Noah found favor with God.” He alone (perhaps including part of his household) was an exception to the universal wickedness, which, by God’s just judgment, soon after brought about universal destruction. Everyone else shared the same guilt, just as they shared the same punishment.

    1. “God saw all the imaginations of the thoughts of his heart”—meaning the inner person, the spirit within them, which is the source of all their internal and external actions. He “saw all the imaginations”: it’s impossible to find a word with a broader meaning. This includes everything that is formed, made, or created within; everything that exists or happens in the soul; every inclination, affection, passion, appetite; every disposition, plan, and thought. Consequently, it must also include every word and action, as these naturally flow from these internal sources and are either good or evil depending on their origin.
    2. Now, God saw that all of this, every single part of it, was evil—it went against moral rightness; it was contrary to God’s nature, which necessarily includes all good; it defied the divine will, the eternal standard of good and evil; it was the opposite of the pure, holy image of God in which humanity was originally created and stood when God surveyed His handiwork and saw that it was all very good; it contradicted justice, mercy, and truth, and the essential relationships each person had with their Creator and their fellow creatures.
    3. But wasn’t there some good mixed with the evil? Wasn’t there some light mixed with the darkness? No, none at all. “God saw that the whole imagination of the heart of man was only evil.” It’s true that many of them, perhaps all, had good impulses placed in their hearts, because the Spirit of God did “strive with man” even then, hoping they might repent—especially during that merciful grace period of 120 years while the ark was being prepared. But still, “in his flesh dwelt no good thing”; their entire nature was purely evil. It was completely consistent with itself and unmixed with anything of an opposing nature.
    4. However, one might still ask, “Was there no break in this evil? Were there no clear moments when something good might be found in the human heart?” We’re not considering here what God’s grace might occasionally work in their soul. Aside from that, we have no reason to believe there was any break in that evil. For God, who “saw the whole imagination of the thoughts of his heart to be only evil,” also saw that it was always the same, that it “was only evil continually”; every year, every day, every hour, every moment. Humanity never turned toward good.

    Are We the Same Now?

    II. This is the trustworthy description of the entire human race that God, who knows what is in humanity and examines hearts and minds, has left for our instruction. This is what all people were like before God brought the flood upon the earth. Second, we are to ask: Are they the same now?

    1. And it’s clear: Scripture gives us no reason to think otherwise. On the contrary, all the biblical passages quoted earlier refer to those who lived after the flood. It was over a thousand years later that God declared through David concerning the children of men, “They have all gone astray” from truth and holiness; “there is none righteous, no, not one.” All the prophets, in their various generations, confirm this. For example, Isaiah, speaking about God’s own chosen people (and certainly non-believers were in no better condition), said: “The whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. From the sole of the foot even to the head there is no soundness; but wounds, and bruises, and festering sores.” The same description is given by all the Apostles, indeed, by the entire message of God’s revealed word. From all these sources, we learn that concerning humanity in its natural state, without the help of God’s grace, “every inclination of the thoughts of his heart is” still “evil, only evil,” and that “continually.”
    2. This description of humanity’s current condition is confirmed by daily experience. It’s true that someone in a natural, unregenerate state doesn’t perceive this, and that’s not surprising. A person born blind hardly recognizes their lack of sight as long as they remain blind. Even less would they realize it if we imagined a place where everyone was born without sight. Similarly, as long as people remain spiritually blind in their understanding, they are not aware of their spiritual needs, particularly this one. But as soon as God opens the eyes of their understanding, they see the state they were in before; they are then deeply convinced that “every living person,” especially themselves, is by nature “altogether vanity”—that is, full of foolishness, ignorance, sin, and wickedness.
    3. We see, when God opens our eyes, that before, we were “atheoi en toi kosmoi”—without God, or more accurately, atheists in the world. By nature, we had no knowledge of God, no real acquaintance with Him. It’s true that as soon as we began to use reason, we learned about the invisible things of God, even His eternal power and divine nature, from the things that are made. From what we could see, we inferred the existence of an eternal, powerful Being who cannot be seen. But still, even though we acknowledged His existence, we had no true acquaintance with Him. Just as we know there is an emperor of China whom we don’t personally know, so we knew there was a King of all the earth, yet we didn’t truly know Him. Indeed, we couldn’t with any of our natural abilities. We couldn’t gain knowledge of God through any of these. We couldn’t perceive Him with our natural understanding any more than we could see Him with our physical eyes. For “no one knows the Father except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal Him. And no one knows the Son except the Father, and anyone to whom the Father chooses to reveal Him.”
    4. We read about an ancient king who wanted to discover the natural language of humans. To settle the matter, he conducted an experiment: he ordered two infants, immediately after birth, to be taken to a prepared place where they were raised without any instruction or ever hearing a human voice. What was the outcome? When they were finally brought out of their confinement, they didn’t speak any language at all; they only made unarticulated sounds, like those of other animals. If two infants were similarly raised from birth without any religious instruction, there’s little doubt that (unless God’s grace intervened) the result would be exactly the same. They would have no religion at all; they would have no more knowledge of God than the beasts of the field, or a wild donkey’s colt. Such is natural religion, separated from tradition and from the influences of God’s Spirit!

      And having no knowledge of God, we can have no love for God. We cannot love someone we don’t know. Most people certainly talk about loving God, and perhaps they imagine they do; at least, few will admit they don’t love Him. But the reality is too obvious to deny. By nature, no one loves God any more than they love a stone or the ground they walk on. What we love, we delight in, but no one naturally finds any delight in God. In our natural state, we can’t imagine how anyone could delight in Him. We take no pleasure in Him at all; He is utterly unappealing to us. To love God! It’s far beyond our reach, out of our sight. Naturally, we cannot achieve it.2
    1. By nature, we not only lack love for God, but we also have no fear of Him. It’s true that most people, sooner or later, develop a kind of irrational, senseless fear, properly called superstition (though some misguided Epicureans mistakenly called it religion). Yet, even this isn’t natural; it’s acquired, mostly through conversation or by example. By nature, God isn’t in our thoughts at all: We leave Him to manage His own affairs, to sit quietly, as we imagine, in heaven, and we handle ours on Earth. So, we have no more fear of God before our eyes than we have love of God in our hearts.
    2. Thus, all people are “atheists in the world.” But atheism itself doesn’t protect us from idolatry. In their natural state, every person born into the world is a blatant idolater. Perhaps we aren’t idolaters in the common sense of the word. We don’t, like pagan idolaters, worship statues made of metal or carved images. We don’t bow down to a wooden post or to something we made with our own hands. We don’t pray to angels or saints in heaven, any more than we pray to saints on Earth. But what does that mean? We have set up our idols in our hearts; and to these, we bow down and worship them: We worship ourselves when we give ourselves honor that belongs only to God. Therefore, all pride is idolatry; it’s attributing to ourselves what is due to God alone. And although pride was not meant for humanity, where is the person born without it? Yet, by this, we rob God of His unchallengeable right and, in an act of idolatry, steal His glory.
    3. But pride isn’t the only type of idolatry we are all naturally guilty of. Satan has also imprinted his own image on our hearts through self-will. “I will,” he declared before he was cast out of heaven, “I will sit upon the sides of the north;” meaning, “I will do my own will and pleasure, independent of my Creator.” Every person born into the world says the same, in countless situations; in fact, they openly declare it without ever blushing or feeling fear or shame. Ask someone, “Why did you do this?” They answer, “Because I felt like it.” What is this but, “Because it was my will;” that is, in effect, “because the devil and I agreed; because Satan and I govern our actions by the same principle.” Meanwhile, God’s will isn’t in their thoughts, isn’t considered in the least, even though it’s the supreme rule for every intelligent creature, whether in heaven or on Earth, stemming from the essential, unchangeable relationship all creatures have with their Creator.
    4. To this extent, we bear the image of the devil and follow in his footsteps. But at the next step, we leave Satan behind; we fall into an idolatry he isn’t guilty of: I mean love of the world. This is now as natural to every person as loving their own will. What is more natural for us than to seek happiness in creation instead of the Creator? To seek satisfaction in the works of His hands that can only be found in God? What is more natural than “the desire of the flesh?” meaning, the desire for sensory pleasure of every kind? People do talk grandly about despising these low pleasures, particularly educated and learned individuals. They pretend to be indifferent to gratifying these appetites, which put them on the same level as perishing beasts. But it’s mere pretense; for everyone is self-aware that, in this regard, they are by nature very much like a beast. Sensual appetites, even the lowest kind, have, more or less, dominion over them. They lead them captive; they drag them back and forth, despite their boasted reason. A person, with all their good manners and other accomplishments, has no superiority over a goat. In fact, it’s highly debatable whether the beast doesn’t have superiority over them. Certainly, it does, if we listen to one of their modern wise figures, who very properly tells us:


      Once in a season beasts too taste of love;
      Only the beast of reason is its slave,
      And in that folly drudges all the year.

      It must be admitted that there is a significant difference between individuals, arising (besides what is achieved by God’s grace that prepares the way) from differences in physical makeup and upbringing. But despite this, who, if not utterly ignorant of themselves, can cast the first stone at another here? Who can withstand the test of our blessed Lord’s commentary on the Seventh Commandment: “Anyone who looks at a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart”? So one doesn’t know what to wonder at more: the ignorance or the arrogance of those who speak with such disdain of people overcome by desires that every human has felt in their own breast—the desire for every pleasure of the senses, innocent or not, being natural to every child of humanity.

    5. And so is “the desire of the eye“—the desire for the pleasures of the imagination. These arise either from grand, or beautiful, or uncommon objects. It might even be that the first two coincide with the last; for perhaps, upon careful investigation, it would appear that neither grand nor beautiful objects please us any longer than they are new. Once their novelty wears off, most of the pleasure they provide is gone; and the more familiar they become, the more dull and tasteless they seem. But no matter how many times we experience this, the same desire remains. The inborn thirst stays fixed in the soul; in fact, the more it’s indulged, the more it grows, prompting us to chase one object after another, even though each pursuit leaves us with unfulfilled hope and deluded expectations. Indeed:

      The old fool, who for many days
      Has struggled with continuous sorrow,
      Renews his hope, and foolishly places
      A desperate bet upon tomorrow!
      Tomorrow comes! It’s noon! It’s night!
      This day, like all the former, flies:
      Yet on he goes, to seek delight
      Tomorrow, until he dies tonight!
    6. A third symptom of this deadly disease, the love of the world, which is so deeply rooted in our nature, is “the pride of life“—the desire for praise, for honor that comes from people. Even the greatest admirers of human nature acknowledge this to be strictly natural; as natural as sight, hearing, or any other external sense. And are they ashamed of it, even learned individuals, people with refined and improved understanding? Far from it—they glory in it! They applaud themselves for their love of applause! Yes, even so-called eminent Christians have no difficulty adopting the saying of that old, vain pagan: Animi dissoluti est et nequam negligere quid de se homines sentiant: “Not to regard what people think of us is the mark of a wicked and abandoned mind.” So, for them, to remain calm and unmoved through honor and dishonor, through bad report and good report, is a sign of someone who is, truly, not fit to live: “Away with such a person from the earth!” But could one imagine that these people had ever heard of Jesus Christ or His Apostles, or that they knew who it was that said, “How can you believe if you accept honor from one another but do not seek the honor that comes from God alone?” But if this is truly the case—if it’s impossible to believe, and consequently to please God, as long as we accept or seek honor from one another and do not seek the honor that comes from God alone—then what a state all humanity is in! Christians as well as pagans! Since they all seek honor from one another! Since it’s as natural for them to do so (by their own judgment) as it is to see the light that strikes their eye or to hear the sound that enters their ear; yes, since they consider it a sign of a virtuous mind to seek the praise of people, and a sign of a vicious one to be content with the honor that comes from God alone!3

    Inferences and Conclusions

    III. 1. I will now draw a few conclusions from what we’ve discussed. First, from this, we can understand a major, fundamental difference between Christianity, viewed as a system of doctrines, and the most refined paganism. Many ancient pagans extensively described the vices of particular individuals. They spoke strongly against greed, cruelty, luxury, or extravagance. Some even dared to say that “no person is born without vices of one kind or another.” But still, none of them were aware of humanity’s fall, so none of them knew of its total corruption. They didn’t know that all people were empty of all good and filled with all sorts of evil. They were completely ignorant of the complete depravity of human nature—of every person born into the world, in every faculty of their soul—not so much by the specific vices that dominate particular individuals, but by the general flood of atheism and idolatry, of pride, self-will, and love of the world. This, then, is the first great distinguishing point between paganism and Christianity. Paganism acknowledges that many people are infected with many vices, and even born with a tendency toward them; but it also assumes that in some, the natural good far outweighs the evil. Christianity, on the other hand, declares that “all people are conceived in sin” and “shaped in wickedness”—that from this, there is in every person a “carnal mind, which is hostile toward God, which is not, and cannot be, subject to” His “law”; and which so infects the entire soul that “in” them, “in their flesh,” in their natural state, “no good thing dwells”; instead, “every inclination of the thoughts of their heart is evil,” only evil, and that “continually.”

    1. From this, we can, second, learn that all who deny this truth, whether they call it original sin or by any other name, are still pagans in the fundamental point that distinguishes paganism from Christianity. They may indeed concede that people have many vices; that some are innate; and that, consequently, we aren’t born as wise or virtuous as we should be. Few would boldly assert, “We are born with as much inclination toward good as toward evil, and that every person is, by nature, as virtuous and wise as Adam was at his creation.” But here is the shibboleth: Is humanity by nature filled with all sorts of evil? Is it devoid of all good? Is it completely fallen? Is its soul totally corrupted? Or, to return to the text, is “every inclination of the thoughts of his heart only evil continually?” Accept this, and you are, to that extent, a Christian. Deny it, and you are still just a pagan.
    2. We can learn from this, in the third place, what the true nature of religion is—specifically, the religion of Jesus Christ. It is therapeia psyches, God’s method of healing a soul that is so diseased. Here, the great Physician of souls applies medicines to heal this sickness; to restore human nature, which is totally corrupted in all its faculties. God heals all our atheism through the knowledge of Himself, and of Jesus Christ whom He has sent; by giving us faith, a divine awareness and conviction of God and of the things of God—in particular, of this important truth, “Christ loved me”—and gave Himself for me.” Through repentance and humility of heart, the deadly disease of pride is healed; the disease of self-will is healed by resignation, a humble and thankful submission to the will of God; and for the love of the world in all its forms, the love of God is the ultimate remedy. Now, this is truly religion: “faith” thus “working through love”; producing genuine, humble meekness, complete detachment from the world, along with a loving, thankful acceptance of and conformity to the whole will and word of God.
    3. Indeed, if humanity had not fallen in this way, none of this would be necessary. There would be no need for this inner transformation, this renewal of our minds. The “superfluity of godliness” would then be a more fitting phrase than the “superfluity of naughtiness.” For an outward religion, without any true godliness at all, would suffice for all rational purposes. And it does, accordingly, suffice in the judgment of those who deny this corruption of our nature. They make very little more of religion than the famous Mr. Hobbes did of reason. According to him, reason is only “a well-ordered train of words.” According to them, religion is only a well-ordered train of words and actions. And they speak consistently with themselves; for if the inside isn’t full of wickedness, if it’s already clean, what’s left but to “cleanse the outside of the cup?” Outward reformation, if their assumption is correct, is indeed the only necessary thing.
    4. But you have not learned the oracles of God in this way. You know that He who sees what is in humanity gives a vastly different account of both nature and grace, of our fall and our recovery. You know that the great purpose of religion is to renew our hearts in the image of God, to repair that total loss of righteousness and true holiness that we suffered through the sin of our first parent. You know that any religion that doesn’t achieve this purpose, any religion that falls short of this—the renewal of our soul in the image of God, after the likeness of Him who created it—is nothing more than a poor farce, a mere mockery of God, leading to the destruction of our own soul. Oh, beware of all those false teachers who would try to pass this off as Christianity! Pay no attention to them, even if they come to you with all the deceitfulness of unrighteousness; with smooth words, with decency, even beauty and elegance of expression, and with all professions of sincere goodwill toward you and reverence for the Holy Scriptures. Hold fast to the plain, old faith, “once delivered to the saints,” and delivered by the Spirit of God to our hearts. Know your disease! Know your cure! You were born in sin: Therefore, “you must be born again,” born of God. By nature, you are wholly corrupted. By grace, you shall be wholly renewed. In Adam, you all died: In the second Adam, in Christ, you all are made alive. “You who were dead in sins, He has made alive”: He has already given you a principle of life, which is faith in Him who loved you and gave Himself for you! Now, “go on from faith to faith” until your entire sickness is healed; and let “that mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus!”4

    Notes on the Translation Choices

    Section 1

    • Introductory Verse: Modernized the Genesis 6:5 quote to a common modern rendering.
    • “Fair pictures” / “gay descriptions”: Translated to “flattering portrayals” and “cheerful descriptions” to convey the sense of overly positive and perhaps unrealistic depictions.
    • “Beholden to any other being”: Changed to “needing help from any other being.”
    • “Self-sufficient, able to live on his own stock”: Simplified to “self-sufficient, capable of living independently.”
    • “Heathens alone”: Changed to “non-Christian thinkers” for broader understanding.
    • “Oracles of God”: Translated to “God’s own revelations.”
    • “The present century”: Refers to Wesley’s century (the 18th). The modern translation keeps this as “the present century” to maintain Wesley’s original perspective within his historical context.
    • “Strong understanding, as well as extensive learning”: Modernized to “highly intelligent and learned individuals.”
    • “The fair side of human nature”: Kept as a direct quote as it seems to be a phrase Wesley is critiquing.
    • “Little lower than the angels” / “little less than God”: Retained the scripture-like phrasing.
    • “Readily received by the generality of men”: Simplified to “so easily accepted by most people.”
    • “Innumerable are the converts they have made, not only in the gay, but the learned world”: “Gay world” refers to the fashionable or worldly society of Wesley’s time; translated as “general public but also in academic circles” for a modern equivalent. “Academic circles” captures the “learned world” aspect better than just “learned.”
    • “Quite unfashionable to talk otherwise”: Changed to “completely out of fashion to speak differently.”
    • “Disparagement of human nature”: Kept as is, as it’s still a clear phrase.
    • “Infirmities”: Changed to “minor weaknesses.”
    • “Utterly irreconcilable with the scriptural”: Changed to “utterly incompatible with what Scripture says.”
    • Scripture References in Paragraph 4: Modernized the embedded scripture quotes (e.g., “made sinners,” “died spiritually,” “fathered a son,” “dead in trespasses and sins,” “without hope, without God,” “children of wrath,” “shaped in wickedness,” “all have sinned,” “gone astray,” “become corrupt,” “no one righteous,” “inclination of the thoughts”). I’ve added a parenthetical clarification for “died” to “meaning they died spiritually” as Wesley himself clarifies it.
    • “Just agreeable this, to what is declared by the Holy Ghost”: Changed to “This aligns perfectly with what the Holy Spirit declares.”
    • “Recited”: Changed to “quoted.”
    • “Take occasion, First, to show…”: Changed to “From this, I will first show…” for a more natural transition.

    Section 2

    Somehow I seem to have lost these notes.

    Section 3

    Notes on Translation Choices:

    • “Senseless, irrational fear, properly called superstition”: Modernized to clarify the distinction Wesley is making.
    • “Blundering epicureans”: “Misguided Epicureans” conveys the critical tone without being overly archaic.
    • “God is not in all our thoughts: We leave him to manage his own affairs, to sit quietly, as we imagine, in heaven, and leave us on earth to manage ours”: Simplified sentence structure and phrasing for natural flow.
    • “Rank idolater”: Retained “blatant idolater” for impact.
    • “Vulgar sense of the word”: Changed to “common sense of the word.”
    • “Stock of a tree”: Clarified to “wooden post.”
    • “Stamping his own image on our heart in self-will also”: Modernized to “imprinted his own image on our hearts through self-will.”
    • “I will sit upon the sides of the north”: This is a direct quote from Isaiah 14:13, where Satan/Lucifer says “I will sit upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north.” Wesley uses it as a concise illustration of self-will. I’ve retained it as a quote.
    • “Nay, and avow it too, without ever blushing upon the account”: Modernized to “in fact, they openly declare it without ever blushing.”
    • “I had a mind to it”: Changed to “I felt like it,” which is a common modern idiom for doing something out of personal desire.
    • “Intelligent creature”: Kept as is.
    • Poetry in Paragraph 9: I’ve reformatted the poetry for easier reading and modernized a few words for flow while retaining the original meaning and rhythm.
    • “Preventing grace”: This is a specific theological term in Wesleyan theology, referring to the grace that goes before and enables one to respond to God. I’ve translated it to “God’s grace that prepares the way” for clarity, while still conveying the technical meaning.
    • “Abide the test of our blessed Lords comment on the Seventh Commandment”: Modernized to “withstand the test of our blessed Lord’s commentary on the Seventh Commandment.”
    • “Desire of the eye”: Kept as a specific biblical phrase (1 John 2:16), making the connection clear.
    • Poetry in Paragraph 10: Similarly reformatted and slightly modernized while preserving the essence.
    • “Hoary fool”: Changed to “old fool” for accessibility.
    • “Pride of life”: Kept as a specific biblical phrase (1 John 2:16).
    • Latin quote and translation: Provided the Latin as Wesley did, and then translated it for clarity.
    • “Eminent Christians, so called”: Retained the slightly critical “so-called” to reflect Wesley’s tone.
    • “Away with such a flow from the earth!”: This is a very strong, almost violent dismissal. I’ve retained it with “Away with such a person from the earth!” to convey that severity.

    Section 4

    • “Grand fundamental difference”: Translated to “major, fundamental difference.”
    • “Apprized of the fall of man”: Changed to “aware of humanity’s fall.”
    • “Total corruption” / “entire depravation”: These are key Wesleyan theological terms, so I’ve kept them while simplifying the surrounding phrasing for clarity.
    • “Carnal mind, which is enmity against God”: A direct biblical quote, maintained but within modern sentence structure.
    • “Shibboleth”: This specific term is kept as it implies a definitive test or distinguishing feature, which is Wesley’s exact intent here.
    • “Therapeia psyches”: Maintained the Greek and provided Wesley’s translation (“God’s method of healing a soul”).
    • “Physician of souls”: Retained this common theological metaphor.
    • “Divine evidence and conviction”: Kept this specific phrasing for “faith” as it reflects Wesleyan understanding.
    • “Superfluity of godliness” / “superfluity of naughtiness”: These are interesting and slightly ironic phrases from Wesley, so I’ve kept them directly as they convey his point well within context.
    • Mr. Hobbes quote: Retained and slightly modernized the surrounding explanation.
    • “Ye have not so learned the oracles of God”: Changed to “You have not learned the oracles of God in this way” to maintain the “you” address.
    • “Poor farce, and a mere mockery of God”: Maintained the strong, condemning language.
    • “Palm this upon you for Christianity”: Changed to “try to pass this off as Christianity” for clarity.
    • “Deceivableness of unrighteousness; with all smoothness of language, all decency, yea, beauty and elegance of expression”: Kept the vivid description of false teachers.
    • “Plain, old faith, ‘once delivered to the saints’”: Maintained this important scriptural reference and concept.
    • Concluding exhortations: Retained the direct, imperative tone (“Know your disease! Know your cure! You must be born again!”).
    • “Principle of life”: A key concept in Wesleyan theology, so retained.
    • “Go on from faith to faith” / “that mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus”: Maintained these biblical phrases.
  • Matthew 6:9b – Father

    Matthew 6:9b – Father

    Our Father in heaven.

    Matthew 6:9b

    Jody provided me with texts about fatherhood this week and quoted just this line specifically. It amused me when I read The Five Gospels, a product of the Jesus Seminar (Robert Funk, specifically), that the word “Father” was the one thing the seminar agreed was definitely something Jesus said.

    But what exactly does this mean? Why does Jesus invoke the image of fatherhood in telling us how to speak to the Father in heaven?

    I’m going to quote four authors that I publish and then make my own comments.

    First is Bruce Epperly, in his book One World:

    At the heart of the Lord’s Prayer is Jesus’ invocation of God as Abba, a term used to describe the intimacy between father and child. The God Jesus prayed to is not distant and demanding,
    preoccupied with rules and regulations, and ready to pounce on our slightest mistake. The God Jesus prayed to is like the best of parents – loving, patient, listening, and guiding, willing even to die for the well-being of the child.
    In calling God “Abba,” Jesus raised the bar for our images of God and our images of parenting. A good parent aspires to be godlike in her or his loving and protective care for vulnerable and impressionable children because this is the way the God of the Universe behaves. The Infinite is the intimate, and loves us more than we love ourselves.

    Bruce Epperly, One World: The Lord’s Prayer from a Process Perspective, p. 8

    There has been some controversy on just what the connotation of “Abba” is, but I think that Jesus’ own relationship to the Father gives us plenty of ground to hold that there is intimacy involved.

    The second book is Ultimate Allegiance: The Subversive Nature of the Lord’s Prayer. I like the title of this book, because we so often take passages like Romans 13 in such a way as to put temporal authority above divine authority. The Lord’s prayer subverts human authorities in any way in which they push us away from God. Our duty as Christians is to follow Christ’s example, not to glorify the temporal authorities, no matter how much they demand it.

    We see this sense of adoption present in Paul’s letter to the Romans, where he suggests that having been freed from the spirit of slavery we can now cry out ”Abba Father,” because the Spirit is speaking through us giving witness to our adoption as children of God. Yes, it would appear that Paul emphasizes this relationship by combining the Aramaic abba with the Greek pater, to emphasize this change in status. Therefore, when we address God as our Father – recognizing the gender related problems inherent in that confession – we give thanks that God has adopted us into the family, making us “heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ” (Rom. 8:15-18). Whatever promises are made to Jesus, our elder brother, are made to us, and we can receive them in trust, knowing that God’s love for us is infinite in character and breadth. Therefore, we need not be anxious about anything (Phil. 4:6).

    Robert D. Cornwall, Ultimate Allegiance, p. 12

    The third source is the forthcoming book Bold to Say, from New Fire Press, an independent imprint produced by Energion Publications the author is Rev. Geoffrey Lentz, a long-time friend.

    Praying to “our” father means that we are a part of a family.  This concept is a helpful corrective to a modern world that focuses so heavily on the individual and his or her rights.  The rabid individualism of the enlightenment often finds its way into church, but there is no place for it in God’s family. When we cannot pray, our sisters and brothers pray for us. When we do not have the words, those gifted with words use them on our behalf. When we lack faith, our friends lend us theirs, much like the paralyzed man’s friends did when they lowered him through the ceiling to Jesus. It was because of their faith that Jesus healed him (Luke 5:20). Our community—not only the church here on earth but all the company of heaven, the community of saints—carries us when we cannot manage on our own. When we pray, the saints are praying with us; the great cloud of witnesses cheer us on as we run our race (Hebrews 12).  To pray as a Christian means to never pray alone. And the most exciting thing about this blessed community called church is that the primary member is Jesus, our older brother. To say, “Our Father,” is to be a part of Jesus’ family, to call his father ours, and know that when we pray, he prays with us and for us (Hebrews 7:25, Romans 8:34, 1 John 2:1).

    Geoffrey Lentz, Bold to Say, forthcoming

    And finally, again emphasizing intimacy and community, we have Dr. David Moffett-Moore, in The Jesus Manifesto:

    “Our Father.” “Father.” All religions understand a transcendent God, a God who is the Holy Other, above and beyond. The mystics of all religions experience a God who is immanent, a God with whom we may be intimate, though most would hesitate to be too familiar with the holy. The Hebrew Scriptures do speak of God as the Father of Israel. But this is not what Jesus describes; he would not call God “father” as I call my dad “father” or as my children might refer to me. Jesus spoke of “Abba,” like an infant’s babbling sound for this big, strong, awesome, gentle, loving presence. “Dada” or “Papa.”
    It is one month old Declan or four month old Evan or 2 ½ year old Ryker. Even Alex at 6 has outgrown the magical mystical intimate wonder of the unconditional trust and abiding confidence of this relationship. Our God is our Abba, our Amma, our strong, gentle, abiding Presence.

    David Moffett-Moore, The Jesus Manifesto, p. 36

    One of the problems people have with this prayer is that our concepts of “Father” may significantly impact the way we read the verse. How did our fathers treat us? Did we have a relationship that could be called “intimate”? Were our fathers trustworthy?

    As with many short, succinct statements in scripture, this one draws a great deal of other material in. We cannot really understand God properly as father, without some idea of how God has acted. How does God function as father?

    I believe this is one of the most important reasons that the Bible is largely presented as story or in the context of story. We don’t have a generic theological treatise telling us in bullet points what God’s character is like. Rather, we have a story of God interacting with humans with all the ambiguities that introduces. This is a tremendous blessing because our lives are filled with various kinds of experiences and we learn to understand others by means of experience–by living a story with them, if you please.

    I recall a friend who had several children telling me how it was truly impossible to treat all children equally. Different levels of consequences and different boundaries are necessary simply because children are different. I think that’s an important point about fatherhood and childraising. Fathers recognize the different experiences of their children. God, in presenting scripture, recognized those different experiences and thus presented the rules and theology in the form of stories or embedded in the context of stories.

    This is a crucial element of recognizing God as Father. God sees you as a unique child. God values you as a unique person. This connection, as multiple authors I quoted point out, is emphasized by the word “our” in the prayer. We pray together with Jesus. We, like him, are God’s children. We are siblings, and he’s not ashamed to admit it (Hebrews 2:11).

    At the same time, we recognize in addressing our heavenly parent that we are also siblings of all humanity. We do not stand on higher ground, addressing the poor masses who don’t have our wonderful father in their inferiority. Rather, in praying this prayer, we are taking our example from the one who was indeed not ashamed to call us brethren. And face it, if Jesus can call us brethren/siblings, we can surely do so to others.

    One of the greatest misunderstandings of being Christians is the idea that it makes us better than or more important than other people. In the light of eternity, in the light of eternal wisdom and eternal righteousness, all of our good character isn’t even a dot on the paper. In recognizing our heavenly parent, we give up the right to look down on others.

    We’ll look at some characteristics in further posts this week, but we’re going to end up looking at a range of verses about fatherhood that go from creation to new creation.

    In the meantime, how can you better imitate your heavenly parent?