Similar Posts

2 Comments

  1. I know it’s outside the fourth gospel, but my mind went to Romans 10:18 to 11:24, in which there’s to my mind a fairly incontrovertible statement of supersession.

    Of course, the problem always arises when a new religion branches from an existing one; it exists between Christianity and Islam, between Islam and Baha’i, between Christianity and LDS even. The new religion thinks they have a better mousetrap and, if they want to preach it, are inevitably supersessionist, the old thinks they’re dangerous heretics.

    Have you any suggestion as to how I can read Romans without supersessionism? I would prefer not to discount Pauline theologising as “just plain wrong”, but at the moment that is my only route.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *