Threads from Henry's Web

Category: Bible Study Method

  • Dangers of Superficial Bible Study

    Henry Neufeld and Geoffrey Lentz at Lectionary at Lunch, First UMC Pensacola, hold new copies of Learning and Living Scripture
    Henry Neufeld and Geoffrey Lentz at Lectionary at Lunch, First UMC Pensacola, hold new copies of Learning and Living Scripture

    I was reminded of this by two events during the last week.  First, the arrival of copies of my new book with co-author Rev. Geoffrey Lentz.  One of the things we emphasize in that book is hearing what the text is actually saying before trying to explain it.  This is a difficult task, probably impossible to get completely correct, but often discussions of Bible texts are carried on with very little reference to the actual texts.  Someone reads it, and then discussion goes on without anyone looking back at the text and asking, “But does it actually say that?”

    The second was my Sunday School class.  Now please don’t get me wrong here.  My current Sunday School class is one of the best I’ve been in, but at the same time, we often attempt to discuss questions that are quite broad.  The topic this past Sunday was how a God of love could slaughter millions of people.  (Pesky detail:  was it actually millions?)  I was asked to comment on a number of issues in the Hebrew scriptures, and we were perhaps half way through when someone pointed out to me that I wasn’t answering the question.

    Indeed I was not answering the question.  I was laying groundwork.  But a deadline of 45 minutes worth of discussion time can make one impatient with laying groundwork and getting down to details.  Yet if you don’t do the necessary groundwork your answer may have very little to do with the text.

    Of course, simply discovering what the text actually says and does not say is just a starting point.  Seeing that text in its proper contexts is also important.  But even that doesn’t get us where most of us want to go.  We want some sort of relevant application.  And that takes even more time.

    When I teach classes on Bible study I usually start by asking if anyone is looking for a five minute a day study method, and suggesting they’ve come to the wrong class.  I firmly believe people without seminary training can and should study the Bible.   But there is no shortcut to actually learning and living scripture.  It’s hard work.

    One of the protections against superficial Bible study is sharing, entering into dialogue about the text as you understand it.  Now if you just share with other people who think as you do, or others who are not experts, you can end up pooling your ignorance.  Part of this dialogue must be with the experts using commentaries, Bible handbooks, Bible dictionaries, and the notes in quality study Bibles.  If you have locally available experts, take advantage of their teaching.

    This doesn’t mean you have to slavishly accept what the experts say.  But if you read their views, always asking why they have come to the conclusions they have presented, you will find places where your study may have fallen short.  You will hear ideas that didn’t occur to you.  Listening to experts does not mean giving up your own judgment.  It does mean letting your judgment be tested against worthy dialogue partners.

    Finally, while it may be painful for some, treating all ideas as equal won’t build understanding.  You need to examine not only what people believe but why, using their “why” to challenge your “why.”

  • Book: For Girls Only! Devotions

    Some of you may justifiably ask just what some guy moving on through middle age is doing writing a review of a book whose title starts For Girls Only! And that was indeed my reaction when I first saw the book in an e-mail from Tyndale House.  Indeed, I had just about deleted the e-mail before I thought, “You know, this particular middle aged guy has two granddaughters, and it’s just possible this might be interesting to them.

    So there are contributions from at least three girls to this review:  My wife Jody, my daughter Janet, and my eldest granddaughter Anna.

    Two things my wife mentioned after only a few minutes working with the book.  It’s a small, ordinary looking book.  If you expected a large, glossy, children’s book, then you’ll be disappointed.  Second, it was not quite suited to Anna’s age, and in fact she is about a year younger than the lowest age, eight, indicated on the cover.  I thought it might be useful to her, however.

    And it turned out to be.  While Janet had to select some of the readings she used, there were many that were applicable.  She sent me this note about the book:

    I have found that For Girls Only! Devotions is a really great book if you just want a few moments with your daughter everyday to spend together discussing topics that she may or may not be facing. This book gives a great platform to open talks with her about other things. It’s great for getting the two of you to just sit and talk! Keeping the lines of communication open during this age is crucial!

    One thing I don’t like about the book is that there us no way of knowing the subject matter of each devotion before reading the whole thing. If you would like to find one that maybe your child is going through at the moment, you would not be able to find it without reading each one.

    I liked the idea of have short devotionals complete with exercises that a parent can do with a child.  Janet also mentioned to me that many of the devotionals deal with issues one might encounter at school, so those devotionals were less relevant to Anna, who is being homeschooled.  At the same time, however, I believe this would be a feature for parents whose children are in public school.

    (I received a free copy of this book as part of the Tyndale Bloggers Network for which I want to thank them.)

  • Josh Mann Series on Existentialism and Hermeneutics

    I believe that as Christians, we need to think a great deal more about how we understand scripture. So I welcome this series by Josh Mann at for the Sake of Truth. I’m going to follow it, and possibly respond when it is complete.

    The first part deals with the definition of hermeneutics and the second with defining existentialism. We’re eating the elephant one teaspoon at a time!

  • Sacrificing for Joy

    The Old Testament Lectionary passage for the first Sunday in Lent, cycle C is Deuteronomy 26:1-11.  It’s kind of an odd text for this season.  You might almost use it as a text for Fat Tuesday.

    I’m going to comment more on the lectionary texts this week, if for no other reason than because I’ve been asked to teach the weekly Lectionary at Lunch group at First United Methodist Church of Pensacola for my friend Rev. Geoffrey Lentz.  I plan to provide another set of comparisons between various study Bibles and what they contribute to the study.  But first I want to note two things from this passage.

    First, Christians often assume that grace is our contribution to religion and that the Israelite religion was one of works and rituals.  But in the confession of faith in this passage, Israel’s faith and worship is clearly rooted in God’s gracious acts to Israel.  God reaches out first and people respond.

    Second, the people bring a sacrifice of first fruits, and it’s not just given in thanks, it’s given for the purpose of having a celebration together.

    It’s easy for us to look down on rituals and ceremonies or on good works in general.  Often this reflects a lack of such works on our own part.  But the real issue is not whether one worships in high or low liturgy, or whether one engages in good works.  Rather, it’s where those acts of worship and good deeds are rooted.  When we are expressing God’s grace through our deeds, and responding to God’s grace in worship, our worship will tend to be filled with God’s presence, and truly be good.

    Without being rooted in God’s grace, we will engage in empty rituals and deeds done for the purpose of earning God’s favor.  Such acts are dead and do not lead to joy.

    Note that the confession comes before the party, just as God’s salvation comes prior to the response.  That is a pattern that is repeated in both the Old Testament and the New.

  • Learning and Living Scripture

    … is the title of my latest, and forthcoming, book, with co-author Geoffrey Lentz.  Geoffrey is associate pastor of First United Methodist Church in Pensacola, FL and has become a regular collaborator on the Participatory Study Series, whence comes the name of this blog.  He also has an Energion Publications author page.

    Learning and Living Scripture is the basic guide to the method, the book that should have come before the study guides we’ve released.  For those bibliobloggers who come by to read, let me note that this probably isn’t the book for you.  It is aimed at the new Bible student or small group that would like to get started in Bible study.  It aims at the same audience as LaHaye’s How to Study the Bible for Yourself (link is to my review) but doesn’t take the literalist view that is taken in that book.  Fee & Stuart, How to Study the Bible for all its Worth (again link to my review) would be more advanced, and is on our recommended reading list.

    The book is currently available for pre-order from Barnes & Noble (link at left).  As of February 13, 2010, B&N was offering this for 9.74 or 8.76 to members, which is 32% off the cover price of $12.99. Amazon.com will let you sign up on a notification list (Learning and Living Scripture: An Introduction to the Participatory Study Method).  I suspect Amazon will have it for pre-order soon.  You can also pre-order from Energion Direct, my company’s direct sales store.  Delivery will be about the same as from other sources, but we’re currently not charging shipping or handling.

    Bloggers or other reviewers can request free review copies.  You can use the free copy request form, or simply e-mail Energion Publications with your name, your review outlet (blog, magazine, etc), and the name of the book you would like to review (Learning and Living Scripture).  We reserve the right to be selective, but we have yet to turn a blogger down for a free book.

  • Can One Be a Bibleist?

    I received a link to the following video in a tweet from @TheActiveWord.  It seems so closely related to my last post that I’d include it here:

    There are several things I agree with here.  First, I do believe that the Bible has the sovereignty of God and the responsibility (of which some sort of free will seems to be a corollary) of humanity.  Second, I also find labels confining.  Yet the very act of using language involves assigning labels, and I note that Rev. Coy is unafraid to apply labels to the editors of Christianity Today.

    But the bottom line again is the idea, presented right toward the end, that one can be a “Bibleist” and believe “the Word of God” without “man’s interpreations.”  Yet even the statement that the concepts of sovereignty and responsibility exist together in some sort of tension is an interpretation.

    I don’t understand why so many Christians are afraid to admit that they are interpreting and then they are following their interpretations.  It sounds so pious to claim that one is following just the word of God without any human involvement.  But by the very fact of recognizing it as God’s word, reading it, and applying it, you are interpreting it.  It’s nothing to be ashamed of.  It’s just a fact.

  • Opinions, Interpretations, and What the Word of God Says

    There’s one use of the phrase “just your interpretation” that implies that no interpretation is better than any other.  This is often used by people who have no idea how a particular text should be interpreted, but nonetheless feel like rejecting your interpretation in particular.  Either they think all interpretations are equal–a common idea these days–or they are just tool lazy or uninterested to bother to check.  (I wrote about this some time ago on my Threads blog.

    But today I’m writing about the opposite use — the idea that you can get past opinions and interpretations to something that is just “what God’s word says.”  For example, this morning a reader named Bryon commented on a post on tithing, and began thus:

    In regards to tithing, the question is not what is someone’s opinion or interpretation of Malachi 3:10. The question is what does the Word of God say about Malachi 3:10 and other scriptures concerning the tithe? …

    (I’ll provide him a link in my reply to his comment, so he can respond here..)

    Now it happens that I agree with most of the interpretations and opinions contained in his post, but they are his opinions of how to interpret those passages and apply them.  My agreement is my opinion as well.  There’s nothing wrong with interpreting or with having opinions.

    Some people think that claiming something is just God’s word is a matter of humility.  If you attribute it to God then you’re not claiming authority for your own opinion.  I happen to disagree.  It is my opinion that not taking credit for your own interpretations and opinions is really rather arrogant.  They are still your opinions; now you’re just letting people think that somehow God is speaking directly through your words.

    For example, Malachi 3:10 does not tell us whether tithing applies to Christians or not.  Clearly it is addressed to the Jewish people after the exile, but there are other commands that are addressed to specific groups of people that many, many Christians believe apply to everyone everywhere.  Determining the person(s) to whom a command applies is a matter of interpretation.

    Now my opinion is that Bryon is right and this command applied to Israel at the time and stewardship is different for Christians.  But that remains my opinion of how the text should be interpreted.

  • Is it Necessary to Know the Biblical Languages?

    I previously answered this question for myself here, but there’s a good and gracious answer today from Brian Fulthorp.

    I would repeatedly emphasize that there are many advantages to knowing Biblical languages.  There are some areas and methods of study that really are closed to you if you don’t know the languages.  Having said that, we have such wonderful tools for study in English that you do have many ways in which you can study seriously without learning the source languages.

  • Quote of the Day – Balentine on Ritual in Leviticus

    From Samuel E Balentine, commenting on the tamid in Leviticus 6:13 and elsewhere in Leviticus (Interpretation, a Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching), p 65:

    … All religious rituals are more than practical or even symbolic acts, as important as these may be.  At their core, rituals are a form of liturgical exegesis that engages both mind and body in the drama of theology. [emphasis in original]

    Of course, many of our Christian rituals lack drama, are not based on exegesis of anything in particular, and mostly engage our backsides with the pew.

    I recall communion at one Methodist church I visited.  The pastor was clearly excited about what he was doing and saying.  He’d filled in those places in the Hymnal where it calls for words appropriate to the occasion.  One felt engaged in the ritual of breaking the bread.  Even more importantly, he clearly saw the ritual as leading to action outside of itself, and used it to focus the message.

    I wish more rituals were like that.

    (Before someone thinks I’m criticizing my home church, my pastors at First UMC Pensacola are doing an excellent job of engaging people in the liturgy, especially at the ICON service.  It is a struggle, however, to disengage people from the pews and engage them elsewhere.)