Threads from Henry's Web

Author: henry

  • Out of the Depths (Psalm 130)

    Out of the Depths is the title of a book on the Psalms by Bernhard W. Anderson, and an excellent little book it is!  it’s title comes from this Psalm.

    There are just two major points I’d like to make about this Psalm.  There is much excellent commentary about it, and the notes are worth reading.  You could do worse than to preach from it or use it in Sunday School.

    First, if you are to cry “out of the depths” that’s means you’re going to be there.  I say that not to discourage, but to encourage.  There are many Christians who either believe, or more commonly imply by the way the talk, that you are never really supposed to be in the depths.  As a Christian you’re supposed to be up, happy, and bouncy all the time.  How do they imply this?  By putting on their “faith face” and denying troubles.  They’ll testify about how God helped them after a problem is successfully handled, but somehow their friends never get to catch them when they’re really down.

    I have this problem even in communicating with my wife.  I don’t want to burden her with the idea that I’m not in control of everything.  But that’s a silly position to be in.  She already knows I’m not in control!

    Odd then, that we should try to put on our faith face even to God.  It’s very discouraging, first because we have to force ourselves to pretend, and second because we make others pretend.  If the “faithful” are always happy and never in the depths, then others who in their own minds are not so faithful must try to keep up or be thought second class citizens.  A little honesty, as exemplified by the Psalmist, would go a long ways!

    Second, however, is  verse 4.  Because there is forgiveness of God, he can be feared. Doesn’t that sound paradoxical!  Now many will try to diminish the impact of the word “fear” by using “respect” or “held in awe” or something similar.  But there is a solid element of fear in respecting God in the Old Testament.

    But the bottom line is that without a recognition of our sin (see verse 3), there would be no way for us to truly respect God.  The person who feels no guilt does not feel fear.  I remember being pulled over by a Michigan state trooper while I was in graduate school.  When the lights flashed behind me and the siren did its thing I was momentarily concerned, but I quickly saw that I was within the speed limit.  I knew I hadn’t blown through any stop signs or been driving erratically, so as she approached the car I was more curious than fearful.  As it turned out, unknown to me my license plate was dangling by one loose screw.  It’s possible someone had started to steal it.  She verified my registration and told me I needed to secure it.  Then on I went.

    With God, we have to recognize who we are and who he is.  But if God was not forgiving, that  recognition would make it impossible to approach for the opposite reason–terror!  Now there is a proper fear of the Lord, a fear that recognizes that there are consequences for our actions and that God knows all.  But there is an improper fear, a different sense of fear.  It’s the difference between fear of just punishment and fear of assault and battery.  The same word may be used, but we all recognize the difference.

    The Psalms are amazingly honest and forthright.  Perhaps we should all try some of that ourselves!

  • Syriac Resources

    What I do with Syriac would only be called “reading” by those who are generous to a serious fault, but I found the resource links James McGrath provided today quite useful.

  • Anothe Mangled Passage – 2 Samuel 18

    I must be sounding like a broken record, but  I really dislike mangled passages.  It is sometimes possible to quote part of a passage and just hit the highlights.  That may be required by time limitations. But when the changes made to the passage change the intent of the story, or make nonsense of it, that is another matter.

    In Proper 14B, the Old Testament passage is 2 Samuel 18:5-9, 15, 31-33. I would divide the story into the following elements, with those in red included in the lection, while those in black are not:

    1. David commands that Absalom be treated gently
    2. The battle occurs and is won by David’s forces
    3. Absalom encounters his father’s troops
    4. Joab is told and rebukes the messenger for not having killed Absalom himself; they debate
    5. Joab goes to where Absalom is hanging from a tree and pierces him with them
    6. Joab’s young men finish the job
    7. The battle ends
    8. A considerable debate about messengers
    9. The Cushite takes word of Absalom’s death
    10. David mourns

    Thus we lose the actual story of Joab’s disobedience which explains much of the later history.  The death appears to be some sort of mob action.  I do agree that in seeking highlights one could leave out the long debate about messengers, though I fail to see why the entire passage cannot be read.

    David’s indulgence is part of the story of David as king.  Note how he is overwhelmed with grief at the death of Absalom while paying little attention to thousands of deaths among the troops who were following Absalom.  One might consider this more or less natural for an ancient near eastern despot, but not for the man after God’s own heart.  And we can see that David’s own followers don’t see it as such a natural thing.  They want thanks for their service and they want to celebrate their victory.

    All of these are elements of the story that call on us to think about the consequences of our attitudes and actions.

    I know that people don’t have much patience for long scripture readings, but learning the Bible story is not well served by cutting out key elements of the narrative.

     

  • Theme Change

    Some readers may not know that I do my blogging in three main locations. Here at Threads, Participatory Bible Study Blog, and The Jevlir Caravansary. I like the three to have a generally similar theme with some graphic differences, and so I have just changed them all to the Atahualpa theme.

    This is a theme that is extremely configurable, but it comes almost precisely like I prefer it to be. All I have to do is create and upload the headers, the logo, and my favicon.

    Those theme guys are due a donation, which they will definitely get.

    I still have some sidebar cleanup done. I am looking to remove things that often take too long to load, so some things will either be going away or will be moved to pages. Go ahead and comment if you have particular sidebar elements that annoy you and slow down your load time. I may not agree, but then again I might!

  • On Inerrancy – a Request for Short Definitions

    Darrell Pursiful at Dr. Platypus is requesting short definitions from those who accept or use the language of inerrancy in describing the Bible. Shorter, definitely, than the Chicago statement. Though I don’t qualify, even though my definition of inspiration has been called inerrancy, I thought I’d pass this on.

  • Word Study Reprise

    It’s very easy to go astray with word studies when one doesn’t know the languages in question.  Since I had a recent request for this material, I want to provide the links to my previous series (from early 2007) on word studies, dangers, and methods.

    1. Word Study Dangers: Overview
    2. Word Study Dangers: The Process
    3. Word Study Dangers: Glosses and Definitions
    4. Word Study Dangers: Your Dependence on Scholars
    5. From Word to Study
    6. A Simple and Legitimate Use for a Concordance Indexed to the Biblical Languages (This post is much later, but related)

    I hope these posts are helpful to those who are trying to get a peak at the Biblical languages.  Even better, set out to learn them!

  • It Was All God – Pride or Humility?

    The gentleman came to me with a sheaf of papers after a meeting at which I was speaking. “I’d like you to read this,” he said, holding them out to me.

    Now this was before I had started publishing, not that I haven’t had related experiences since. But even so, this gentleman wanted me to tell him whether he should seek a publisher. In our conversation, it actually became clear that what he wanted to hear was that his manuscript was great and he should urgently seek a publisher. He wanted affirmation, not discernment.

    He looked right at me and said: “God gave me all of this. These aren’t my words. I couldn’t have written them. It was all God.”

    There are at least two ways to take a statement like that. The first is that the man believed that what he was holding in his hand was something good. (For the record, it wasn’t. I can’t tell you it was wrong; it was simply too incoherent for me to be certain.) He might then be humbly saying that he could not do this on our own. It is good for us to remember that without God, we are not. Period!

    But there is another sense in which such a statement might be made, and I have sensed it in many cases, and this is to try to force someone to pay more attention. It might be that the writer is concerned about the quality and wants to catch the reader’s intention. It might be that the writer lacks credentials and believes that the claim that God did it is the only thing that will give the contents weight.

    When People Speak for God front cover

    I commit an entire chapter of my book When People Speak for God to this topic in a chapter titled Practical Considerations of Hearing. The problem is that we are all too willing to make the claim to be speaking for God in the church today without realizing how serious such a claim is.

    In charismatic communities this often comes out very directly, with people claiming to speak prophetic words frequently. Now I want to be clear that I believe God can and does speak. If I could summarize the thesis of my book in the size of a tweet, it would be, “God always speaks; we rarely listen.” (That line doesn’t occur in the book itself, but it does summarize the thought.) But in Old Testament times the claim to be a prophet was serious. The penalty for being a false prophet was death.

    When discussing someone’s claim to be a prophet, I have been told a number of times over the last few years that one cannot always throw strikes. Now when we’re praying for one another, advising one another, sharing what we believe we heard from God in our devotional time, that’s quite true. The key in each of those cases is that we’re talking about what we have understood and not claiming that we are directly passing on a message from God for the hearer. But the attitude that dismisses claims of false prophecy as unimportant cannot, in my view, be reconciled with any scriptural view of prophecy.

    Those who don’t believe in modern prophecy shouldn’t feel left out, however. A preacher in the pulpit, proclaiming God’s word needs to take that point very seriously. If I pridefully proclaim my own view as God’s view, not acknowledging that I am a broken vessel pouring out God’s word as I best understands it, and inviting you to search for yourself and hear God for yourself, I am in danger of the same fault. I could be said to “speak presumptuously” (Deut. 18:17-22) and one need not read far to find the penalty for that.

    I think that this is another of those Christian paradoxes, however, like the incarnation. It is clearly impossible for Jesus to be 100% God and 100% human at the same time, yet that is precisely what I believe. It is (humanly) impossible to proclaim God’s word with full conviction and complete humility, yet I see that as the call to those who preach and teach.

    The canon of scripture as we have it consists of materials that were read many times over the centuries by God’s people with the resulting conviction that this is God speaking. Sometimes the prophets said specifically “this is what God says.” At other times we have extended writing that doesn’t make that announcement. In discussing canonization, we often fail to emphasize the fact that the body of believers that made the canon a formal canon was already using roughly those books. Why? I believe it is because they heard God speaking in them.

    Whatever the format by which I present God’s word, whether in a blog post, in writing, in teaching, in a sermon or a private conversation, the key issue will be this: Do people hear God through me? When I make the claim, I am in danger of pride. I don’t deny that God may call on a prophet to say “This is what God has to say.” He certainly has. I don’t deny that God may call on a preacher to say, “This is the word of the Lord” when he preaches.

    But the most important thing is that the preacher or teacher actually gets out of the way and lets the Holy Spirit work. If I get out of the way, people will recognize what God is saying to them, often when I have said it very poorly. As a friend of mine said in a recent sermon, it’s a miracle that people ever hear God’s word when he’s standing in the pulpit. And he’s a pretty good preacher!

    When I am weak, then I am strong! – 2 Corinthians 12:10

  • Could You Use This Video about YOUR Church?

    Though I think I might ask myself the next question. Will I grow spiritually after I get there? The atmosphere of grace is, I believe, most conducive to growth!

    (HT: Kouya Chronicle)

  • Christian Carnival CCLXXXVIII Posted

    … at the Jevlir Caravansary, which is one of my blogs.  It’s the “caravan route edition.”  Enjoy!

  • The Espresso Book Machine

    This is an announcement from my company, but the technology is very interesting. Books on demand has gone to a new level.