Threads from Henry's Web

Category: Bible Study Method

  • 2 Corinthians – The Importance of the Story

    I’m reading Frank J. Matera’s fine commentary on 2 Corinthians, and today was reading about Paul’s recitation of his history with the Corinthians as the basis for what  he was about to teach them.  I warn you that this post is only partially about 2 Corinthians.  It is more broadly about the importance of seeing the stories involved in each passage of scripture.

    The word “story” gets used a great deal when talking about Biblical interpretation these days.  I want to be careful in explaining how I am using it here.  I am not suggesting that we each have a story (though we do) and that any story is equally valid.  Rather, I’m suggesting that the story of God’s revelation is important in understanding scripture overall, and that the particular stories of prophets, apostles, and audiences are critically important in understanding and applying passages effectively.

    More than one story can intersect as well.  In both letters to the Corinthians we can look at a story of God revealing himself to the believers in Corinth, using the apostle Paul and others in doing so.  There is the story of Paul living out his life as an apostle of Jesus Christ.  There is a story of preservation in that this content is made available to us.  Finally, there is a story of God bringing his word to me and to you in our particular circumstances.

    This doesn’t mean that just any story will do and that we must give equal credence to all stories.  In fact, paying close attention to the stories will bring us to a more focused view of the meaning of various passages.

    No commentator that I know of ignores the story of Paul’s interactions with the Corinthians.  I have previously enjoyed Gordon Fee’s commentary on 1 Corinthians, which I regard as the best single-volume, pastor accessible commentary I have ever read.  Fee is very concerned with Paul’s story as indeed he must be.  Similarly Matera is very conscious of that continued story in the commentary I’m currently reading.  I bring these two together, because both relate the story in such a way as to preserve the unity and the coherence of both letters.

    In 2 Corinthians, the story helps us see some important elements of being a servant who proclaims God’s word.  Paul can sound quite boastful as he defends his own ministry and integrity.  He is quite conscious of the problem as he writes, but nonetheless he knows that his integrity, his calling, and his reliability are inextricably linked to the proclamation of his gospel.

    This second letter, or more likely fourth letter assuming we’re missing two, teaches that the gospel manifests itself not merely in a set of beliefs, but also in a life.  It is especially important for those chosen to proclaim the gospel to display the gospel in their lives.

    I think 2 Corinthians is particularly susceptible to being mined for theological quotes, because the letter as a whole is difficult, yet it so obviously contains many theological gems.  But we may miss the emphasis of those gems by pulling them out of their setting.

    Let me illustrate this from 1 Corinthians, which I think is also very subject to quote mining.  Chapter 12 is frequently used in charismatic circles as a chapter about gifts.  The emphasis is on determining just what each gift means and what the person having that gift will be able to do.  But Paul is not primarily attempting to catalog gifts.  His concern is with the source of these gifts and how they are to be used.  He’s telling the church in Corinth that the gifts that they have are to be used in unity under the authority of the one Spirit.

    Chapter 13 is a beautiful chapter, but frequently those talking about gifts and worship skip straight over it to get to chapter 14 where we’re talking about nuts and bolts again–fun stuff!  But Paul didn’t just let his mind wander into some special spiritual realm in order to write chapter 13.  Read it carefully with chapters 12  and 14, and you’ll see how Paul’s definition of love is also a way to describe how one uses God’s gifts under God’s Spirit.  It connects closely with what precedes and follows it.

    Note here that in narrowing he focus from a general treatise on gifts to a discussion of the source and purpose of those gifts, we also broaden the discussion to cover Christian behavior in general.  Chapter 12 provides a pattern for using any and all of our gifts, talents, and resources, and then chapter 13 names that “love” and expands on just what it means.

    Chapter 14, in turn, is frequently mined for quotes to apply to almost any worship setting, but the fact is that most of our churches do not have a worship service like the one in Corinth that they need to bring into line with God’s Spirit.  Be honest now!  How many churches can say that at their worship services, “each one has a hymn, a lesson, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation” (1 Corinthians 14:26 ESV)?

    Yet I’ve heard verse 40 (“decently and in order”) used to argue that one can’t make any change in the bulletin at all, or that nobody other than the pastor and designated readers should speak.

    Getting into the pastoral situation in which Paul finds himself would help us apply this properly.  Perhaps we should move our focus from verse 40, as important as that is, and look more at verse 26.  When we actually have two or more people wanting to speak at once, then we could try working on some of the other verses.  Right now, most of the churches I visit are singularly short on “lessons” and “revelations” not to mention the rest.

    To return to 2 Corinthians, I am getting the feeling that God is challenging me through Paul’s experience to make myself a better example of the gospel that I claim to teach.

    But watch out even there, because 2 Corinthians also tells us about God using the weak.  How to I make myself a better example?  I let God use my weaknesses.  The gospel, after all, is about grace, not about my strength or brilliance.

  • Why Not Study the Bible?

    You may think that a strange title for a post on  Bible study blog.  Obviously if you read this blog you must in some sense be interested in studying the Bible.  But I want to direct this question specifically to Christian education leaders in churches.  This is the time of year when curriculum is chosen.  Often new Sunday School classes or small groups are set up.

    In many churches most of these groups will study some topic relevant to daily living.  If you’re doing well, you will use materials that are written from a Christian perspective or at least in conversation with Christianity.  Some of you will find a book on the Bible or a study guide that leads you step by step through a passage or Bible book, and you’ll study that.

    Now I have nothing against all these ideas for study.  There is a place for all of those things.  I can hardly complain, considering that I publish some study curriculum, both for Bible study (Luke, Hebrews, and Revelation) and for specific topics such as spiritual gifts, prayer, and discipleship.

    But at some point, Christian believers need to get to work and study the Biblical text directly for themselves.  A church based small group is a great place to get started on this.

    I have a number of suggestions related to Bible study at this blog’s sister site, Participatory Bible Study.  There are many other resources online, and there are also resources in many places on the internet.

    Here are some suggestions:

    1. Have someone in the group who has previously been involved in serious Bible study.  The idea is not to have this person dominate, but to provide a check on group activities and to suggest resources.
    2. Use a variety of Bible versions in your group.  Some people try to settle on a single translation so that everyone can follow along with any reading, but if you have nobody in the group who can consult the original languages (certainly a rarity these days!), comparing multiple versions will help you get a feel for different ways the source text might be understood.
    3. Charge different members of the group with following all using different resources.  Commentaries, study Bibles, Bible dictionaries, and Bible handbooks are all useful if employed properly.  Don’t follow a single resource and simply accept what it says.
    4. If you’re using study Bibles, again try to get different members of the group to consistently use different ones.  I am distressed when students resort to “the lower half of the page” when asked what a passage means.  You may need ideas from experts, but try to get more than one.
    5. Don’t make your Bible study group into a prayer group, but don’t neglect prayer.
    6. Challenge all members of the group to engage in Bible study daily and not just try to wing it during the hour or two that the group meets.
    7. Be contagious.  Share what you learn around the church and in your community.  This is not only to provide them with the blessing of what you have learned, but to hear from them and potentially be corrected by them.
    8. Don’t start with the hard books.  I am very anxious to get Christians to study the Pentateuch, for example, because it provides so much background for how we understand the message and ministry of Jesus.  But as much as I love Leviticus, I don’t recommend it as a starting point.  I recommend starting with a gospel such as Mark.  (Many recommend John, but I think you will get more out of John if you read Mark first.)
    9. Be faithful.  It’s better to have a smaller group and commit to be there.  Showing up when you can may be necessary for some people’s work schedule, but make as strong a commitment as your life allows and then live up to it.

    I believe that if you study the Bible directly, you will quickly find that it is very relevant as the answer to those other questions about life.  The folks who wrote books and study guides on specific topics generally started by studying the Bible and then applying the principles they found to a particular issue.  It’s valuable to share the results of their study, but as you can, go deeper!

    So, why not study the Bible this fall in your church?

  • Lectionary Notes

    One of my devotional practices is to keep track of the weekly lectionary texts (not the daily and often not special days during the week), and read them through daily using different versions and different reference sources.

    I keep notes online when I have time.  I haven’t publicized this very much because I have been quite irregular, but I really like to get some kind of a note from these passage on a daily basis, so I’ve added the feed to the far right sidebar.

    Today I posted on another passage where I think the lectionary cuts off in an unfortunate way.

  • N. T. Wright on Women in Ministry

    It’s no surprise that I like this, considering it’s N. T. Wright.  I like reading or listening to him even when I disagree.  (HT:  Allan Bevere)

    While I like his comments in general, I’m particularly interested in his approach to deriving his point from scripture.

    He goes first to the story.  What was it that Paul did.  That leads him to Romans 16:7, certainly a controversial story, though I agree with Wright’s take on it.  Then he goes to the overarching story by rooting his idea in the resurrection and the persons who proclaimed it.  Finally, he looks at 1 Timothy 2 and sees it in the context of these two larger stories.

    This process leaves us more subject to theological reflection than would a direct text->doctrine approach, but it helps us resolve the question of what constitutes advice for a particular time and place and what is a broader principle.

  • Exegesis of Stop Signs

    I’d seen this some time ago, and it’s really good. Hermeneutics in Everyday Life.

  • A Thought on Leviticus 16:13

    I was struck by the wording of Leviticus 16:13 tody. There is a long list of instructions, followed by the clause “that he may not die.” It’s just 2 words in Hebrew.

    It seems to me that the Israelites approached the issue of God’s judgment against them very differently than we do. Rather than seeing contact with God as essentially safe activity and death or harmful results as requiring explanation, approaching God is seen as deadly. It’s survival that requires explanation.

    This is hardly a new thought, and one should note some other differences, for example that the word “judgment” can be misleading in this context.

    I’m posting from my Palm Centro, so I’ll be brief and probably miss a large number of nuances!

    Tags: Leviticus

  • Leviticus Study

    I’ve been following through the Cornerstone Biblical Commentary in my study of Leviticus for the last few weeks.  Unfortunately, the way I like to study these passages involves reading the text in Hebrew, reading and annotating the commentary, reading the text in the LXX, hunting down materials in other commentaries and translations, and so forth.  Considering that one of the commentaries on my shelf is Jacob Milgrom’s three volume set (well, it’s usually on my desk, not the shelf!), that involves a great deal of time.

    The kind folks at Tyndale House sent me a complimentary copy of the commentary volume with the idea that I would review it, and they deserve a review sooner than I’m likely to finish the book .  So I’m going to pause the detailed study, read the commentary through, and then return to having fun with the texts.  I may post notes along the way and will definitely post a review of the whole volume.

  • Tips for Studying the New Testament

    Chris Tilling gives three. I’m linking because of #2–read the New Testament, which could be said for Bible study in general–read the Bible. Odd how many miss that!