Threads from Henry's Web

Author: henry

  • Is Seminary Necessary?

    Sky McCracken thinks we may not, and has some good thoughts on the matter.

  • MyBibleVersion.com Update

    It has been some time since I discussed the MyBibleVersion.com site, and indeed it has been some time since I updated it.

    Today I added Google FriendConnect and the ability to comment.  Comments are active on the index page and on each of the Bible version detail pages.

    I believe this will give me the facility to have decently secure login, which is a prerequisite for my planned personalization.  If I am successful in implementing this, each user will be able to enter values for the various translation attributes and compare versions using the same system I do.

    Don’t hold your breath–this has to be done in my spare time.

    In addition, I plan to add the ISV within the next few days.  I delayed doing the ISV because the Old Testament was scheduled to appear.  At this point I have enough material to work with.

  • Beware Friends Bearing Manuscripts

    That’s something every editor should have laminated and stuck on the wall. There is nothing to make me cringe like a friend or relative telling me that they have a manuscript they’ve been working on for a long time. Inevitably this leads to the question, “Would you be interested in looking at it?”

    Depending on how good a friend, or if the relative is in the part of the family you’re speaking to, you really can’t say, “No, I suspect your manuscript stinks, and I really don’t want to have to make that opinion official.” On the other hand, once you have the manuscript in your possession, your only defense is your power of procrastination.

    You see, when you have to pay the bills, you can’t accept the manuscript for publication just because the author is a friend. You can’t lie and say, “This is a wonderful manuscript, but I can’t publish it right now,” because the author will doubtless continue to hound you after receiving such encouraging news.

    All this is my round about way of telling you that while I always look at manuscripts brought by family and friends, I do so with serious reservations. I don’t want to be the bearer of bad tidings, but I can’t afford to publish something I can’t sell.

    So when I found out that Nick May, who was my son James’s best friend (without prejudice to several other best friends) was writing a book, I received the news with mixed emotions. “Sure,” I said, “I’ll be happy to look at it.” And really, truly, I was happy to do so. I just wasn’t happy at the possibility that I would have to say, “This just won’t do for us” much less “you need some more writing practice!”

    But when I read the sample chapters he sent, I knew I was saved. His writing was excellent, his subject controversial. It was possible I would even lose some friends by choosing to publish his book, and such a book is always of interest. After all, if someone isn’t angry about a book, it’s probably not accomplishing anything.

    So just what is Megabelt, and why did I choose to make it our first fiction title for Energion Publications? (Press release.)

    Well, you can follow the links for details on the book itself. I can simply tell you this: I laughed hysterically at points while reading it. At the same time it held up a mirror to my life and ministry and made me think. A book that can make you laugh and think seriously at the same time has something important going for it. Laughing and thinking are excluded from church far too often.

    Just try changing the order of service in the bulletin of many churches and listen to the complaints. People didn’t know what to do. They were confused! They couldn’t handle having another prayer before the scripture reading, or two songs at the beginning, or perhaps being asked to stand at a moment when they had been sitting. The problem for them is that church is a habit. It’s not that going to church is a habit. It’s that the elements of church itself are habitual. Heaven forbid they should be asked to participate!

    But even more, we have many ministries that are also habits. Now some of these habits are good things. Visiting the sick or shut-ins. But what happens if the pastor asks some other members to visit someone who is sick or shut-in? Oh the misery! Oh the insult! They have been treated as lesser beings because they received a visit from the wrong person.

    Youth ministry is another area of habit. There are certain things that you do, and if you don’t do them, you’re not really “reaching” the youth. If you try something new it will doubtless be dangerous, or you’ll find members of the church who remember a time long, long ago when someone tried that and it didn’t work.

    My friend and pastor Geoffrey Lentz likes the following quote:

    “Tradition is the living faith of dead people to which we must add our chapter while we have the gift of life. Traditionalism is the dead faith of living people who fear that if anything changes, the whole enterprise will crumble.” – Jaroslav Pelikan

    While, as the description says, Megabelt doesn’t have an agenda, nor is it a story with a moral, it takes aim at our traditionalism by highlighting it in action. Like me, I suspect that you will find that the mirror shows you in a less than flattering light at some points. The question, of course, is what one does after one looks in the mirror.

    23For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man looking at his natural face in a mirror; 24for he sees himself, and goes away, and immediately forgets what kind of man he was. 25But he who looks into the perfect law of freedom, and continues, not being a hearer who forgets, but a doer of the work, this man will be blessed in what he does. — James 1:23-25 (WEB)

    So what about publishing a book without a moral? I told Nick that if he had written a story with a single moral, I would have been less likely to buy the manuscript. Since bedtime story days, when we had an endless supply of children’s stories with a moral, I have despised the story written with one single purpose in mind, that inevitably leads to that one moral.

    You may say that Jesus told such stories, but if so, I would suggest you read Jesus more closely. My wife borrowed a devotional from me today, The Work of Being a Disciple. I grew up with the notion that a parable had one meaning and you should ignore everything else in favor of that. I found later that parables have a multistage punch–the longer you go on thinking about them, the more they do to you.

    I’m not calling Megabelt a parable, nor am I nominating Nick for the role of Jesus–I doubt he would thank me! But I am suggesting that sometimes we will hear in story what we would miss otherwise. In other words, while no moral is pushed in your face in this book, you may nonetheless get many morals from it–if you’re willing to think while you laugh, and after you laugh as well.

    I can’t ask much more of a manuscript, even when borne by a friend!

  • The Bad Name of Evangelism

    Via Shane Raynor on Twitter and the Wesley Report, I found this article on UMPortal about early Methodist evangelism. What struck me, was how many of the ideas there could be found in Acts.

    Here’s a key quote:

    She [Rev. Laceye Warner of Duke] defined evangelism as preaching the gospel of salvation in Jesus Christ and “living it out.”

    I think we can trace the bad name of evangelism to two things:

    1. We have separated evangelism from discipleship, i.e., we equate evangelism with persuading people to say a particular prayer
    2. We think evangelism is about talking people into joining our particular church

    While the symptoms are varied, including much obnoxious behavior, I think at least most of the symptoms can be traced back to one of those two points.

    A return to the long term, often difficult work of making disciples would be rather valuable, I think.

  • Bibles with a Viewpoint – The Green Bible

    Those who read this blog regularly are probably already aware that I have mixed emotions about study Bibles.  I would say “love-hate relationship” but none of my feelings about study Bibles attains the level of “love.”

    Via Sun and Shield I found a review on First Things of The Green Bible.  I recommend reading the review.  I have not purchased, nor have I read, the Green Bible, and I don’t plan to.  None of my comments here are based on anything specific written in the notes to that Bible.  It is to the very idea that I object, not this particular implementation.

    Now let me state for the record that I am not offended by the idea of discovering reasons for taking care of the earth properly in your Bible.  I think that much of that is covered under the theology of creation, if one pays attention.

    No, my problem is more general.  Think of it this way.  Supposing someone took one of my books, sliced it up, and then inserted comments about some particular theme everywhere.  Let’s say, for example, that these comments had to do with the ecology.  I support recycling.  I support reducing carbon emissions.  I think we’re doing too little.  But that’s not really my field of study, so there would be a few sentences here and there, just like the ones in this paragraph that indicate what I believe.  So instead of focusing on the topic I intended the book to focus on, the new book, whilst being anchored by text I had written, would be focused on something that was quite incidental to the earlier work.

    How would I react?  Easy question.  I’d say, “Go write your own book.”

    The Bible is different in many, many ways from one of my books.  It is a collection, it is ancient, it comes from a different culture than mine, and it is regarded as sacred, which nobody has or likely will do with mine.  There are reasons to apply commentary to the Bible.  But when that commentary is interspersed with the Bible text, it becomes easy to confuse the reader and slant the result toward a particular topic.  That’s as true of The American Patriot’s Bible: The Word of God and the Shaping of America
    as it is of The Green Bible.  It doesn’t matter which of them is more compatible with my own views (The Green Bible, for what it’s worth).  Both Bibles are offensive to me.

    Some may not believe that anyone would be confused.  Surely they know the difference between the Biblical text and the commentary.  But I have found in Bible studies that when people use study Bibles they very often take the notes as the true word of God, while spending little time on the text.  Even more frequently they take the theme of a passage from the introduction and notes rather than, again, reading the text itself.

    Simply the fact that a single theme is taken and emphasized throughout is enough to introduce unbalance.  I believe that’s a substantial problem.

    My suggestion to people who want to emphasize that the Bible is green as green can be, or that every word of scripture supports American patriotism?  Write your own book!

    There is good reason to have study Bibles, but I think those who write notes for such Bibles have a great responsibility to point back to the text.  Thus providing background information, interpretational options, and structural notes can be very helpful.  The problem comes in when the notes begin to direct the study and its emphasis.

  • Lazy

    … Bible study that is.  Food for thought from for the Sake of Truth.

  • Sexual Attraction and Divinity

    Two of the lectionary passages today, at least if you go with the United Methodist selections, involve romance and sexual attraction.  One, of course, is Song of Songs 2:8-13 and the other is Psalm 45, which has a foreign princess marrying the king of Israel.  The second involves romance at least as far as an arranged political marriage, probably into a harem, can do so.

    I think there are two major pitfalls in interpreting these passages, and these apply especially to Song of Songs.  The first is that we will miss the spiritual lessons because we are enjoying the story and the poetry.  Literature that involves sex is both popular and controversial. I’m guessing that after some time on the internet, when I check the stats for this article, there will be a correlation between the number of times I mention “sex” in it, and its popularity.  So one can read these passages as simple, physical attraction.

    The other pitfall, however, is that we will quickly spiritualize the passage and miss out on the physical connection.  In my view sexual attraction and romantic love provides us with the best metaphor we’re going to get for God’s love and passion for us, and how diligently God seeks to provide his grace.  At the same time, it provides us with a pattern for our own behavior with respect to God.

    One common view of Song of Songs is allegorical.  Now I won’t deny that some good things have come out of reading this book allegorically.  But I do believe that reading it as allegory and denying its value as a simple and passionate love story diminishes the book.  It is not written as allegory.  It is written as love poetry.  It is not necessarily to be understood, but to be lived.

    And there is where we can also tie James 1:17-27.  Perhaps we don’t really understand something unless we have lived it.  Notice God’s own example in Jesus Christ.  God came and lived among us in human form in Jesus Christ.  God obviously knew, but in Jesus he shared the experience of human beings living in an imperfect world and day by day facing the challenges of being very, very finite.

    Despite our unfortunate tendency to regard anything sexual as dirty, and requiring that it be separated from spirituality, human attraction relates very closely to God’s longing for us, and our search for God.  In romantic love, no amount of factual knowledge of a partner would suffice, if learned apart from personal experience of that partner.

    So it is with God.  I cannot study theology for years and expect that this alone will let me truly know God.  I need to experience God, to be sought passionately by God, and in my turn to seek God passionately.

     

  • When the Glory of God Shows Up

    Scripture:  1 Kings 8:10-11 (Proper 16B)

    I like to say that God is present everywhere, and that the difference between one time and another is much more with our awareness of God’s presence than it is with any action on God’s part.  But if we believe scripture, there are times when God’s presence is especially visible, and this passage narrates one of them.  You can get a better picture by reading all of chapter 8, rather than just the snippets that are included in the lectionary passage.

    The question I want to present is this:  Can we experience God’s presence in a special way today, and if so, how?  Further, how similar would that experience be to what is described in this text?

    Make sure that you don’t discount the text before you start.  It appears to me, at least, that we’re talking about an impact that is visible to all.

    Here are some links to blog posts or essays in which I discuss God’s glory:

     

    Ezekiel 1 – a Glimpse of the Glory of Yahweh (Energion: Religion, Philosophy, and Politics)

    This is my starting point.  It’s a college paper I wrote my senior year in college. I’d largely stand by what I said now.  The glory of God and its movement is a substantial theme in Ezekiel, and the positioning of the various elements is no accident.

    Eternity in Liturgy (Participatory Bible Study Blog)

    How does glory fit into liturgy?  This is one of the key questions that tie into those I asked above.

    Lectionary Texts for the Transfiguration – Cycle A (Participatory Bible Study Blog)

    The transfiguration gives insights into the nature of God’s glory and the purpose of its appearance.

     

     

  • Disaster and Judgment

    John Piper has suggested that the tornado that struck Minneapolis was a judgment on the ELCA for the recent change in their statement on human sexuality. Piper is a great preacher, and despite some disagreements, I love to hear him present a good gospel message, but I find this, and other similar statements, quite disturbing.

    I think it is biblical to hold that God can send judgment. But I also think it is Biblical, with Job as the showcase example, to think that disaster need not be judgment. Much damage can be done when Christians are told that all setbacks and hardships are somehow a sign of punishment from God. Suffering may come so that we can learn, it may come despite our best efforts, it may come to the best of us, it may come to the worst of us, and finally, it may come because that’s how things work.

    After Hurricane Ivan I was very glad that our double wide trailer was undamaged. As I drove from the home where we had been guests to our home, I saw many similar structures completely gutted. In fact, I had little hope in my mind after the drive that I would find anything where we lived, but there was no damage at all.

    So did God love us more than those other people? Was this salvation because we are praying people who put our trust in God? Even in normal circumstances, I would hardly think so. But in this case our 17 year old son was dying, and within a week of the storm he had gone on to be with the Lord. If we could have lost our home and kept our son, what might I have chosen?

    So to reverse it, were we much more wicked than all those folks who did not lose children to cancer that day or that week?

    It’s simply a dangerous game. If you feel strongly about what the ELCA has done, expressing that belief is appropriate, even expressing it vigorously. But I think it would be better to leave the tornadoes out of it.

    I found the Internet Monk’s comments on this very helpful and well stated, though his were in response to a different post.

    Update: I had intended to provide links here to my Hand of God series of three essays: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3, as well as a story I wrote some time ago for the God-Talk Club series on my Jevlir Caravansary fiction blog, The God-Talk Club: Tornadoes.