OK, these are just too much fun. I understand some people have gotten offended. If you’re that easily offended you should read them–you deserve it! (HT: Dave Black Online.)
Author: henry
-
Persecution
I hear complaints from time to time that American Christians are persecuted. Usually this means some minor annoyance, such as being ridiculed for some belief or another. I’ve even heard the complaint when someone is challenged to provide a defense for their faith.
One of the best ways to get our balance, and to realize how privileged we are in America, despite any minor annoyances, we have but to look at places where Christians are currently actively persecuted, where a threat to their livelihood is the most minor of persecutions, where, in fact, Christians may be killed for their faith.
World Prayr, an organization with which I’m associated, has been highlighting persecuted Christians on their blog in their daily devotional posts. (You can find today’s post here.)
I’d like to add one thing here. In America, we are in the majority as Christians. We may complain about nominal Christians or Christians in name, but churches are ubiquitous, and well accepted. As a majority, we need to resist the temptation to behave as persecutors. As an example, I’m referring to opposition to allowing Muslims to build mosques, and to opposing minority religion representation amongst military chaplains. If these things happened to Christian minorities in other countries, we’d regard it as persecution. We need to do unto others as we would have them do to us.
-
My Dad Was a Fundamentalist
Labels are such tricky things, and any linguist is aware of the problems of saying that a word should mean some certain thing. So I’m going to resist that. But it would be nice to have a label for people who were very firm about the tenets of their faith, and yet was not also a pejorative term.
More and more, “fundamentalist” is used in a pejorative sense. You can be an evangelical Christian, and you might be considered a reasonable person. A little over pious, perhaps, but reasonable. But fundamentalist now carries the connotation of Westboro Baptist protesting at funerals, suicide bombers, and planes flying into buildings. Most fundamentalists I know, whether Christian or Muslim, don’t think the actions of those groups. You even have the term “fundamentalist atheist” for atheists who are firm in expressing their beliefs and don’t give in to anyone else.
On one online forum in which I participated, the common standard was to use “fundamentalist” of the person’s basic beliefs, but to call someone who was also over the line in terms of behavior a “fundy.” It didn’t always work. In fact, it rarely worked, because a pejorative label is unlikely to be received well by anyone.
Now my dad was, in terms of beliefs, a fundamentalist Christian. He believed literally in all the major doctrines–virgin birth, resurrection, a literal and imminent second coming of Jesus, the complete truth of the Bible, a literal and recent reading of the Genesis creation story, and salvation by faith alone in Christ alone. He didn’t waver from any of those believes.
He was also a medical doctor who spent his life serving others. He never made the kind of money that one expects of a physician. He never intended to nor did he try to. He put his effort into serving. He made no distinctions of religion, race, or nationality (or of any other kind that I know of) in the people he served. He treated everyone with the sort of respect that must be part of one’s nature; it’s not put on, so it never slips. He fit none of the stereotypes of a fundamentalist.
I disagree with some of the religious positions my father held, but I have a profound respect for his faith, his service, and the way he dealt with people. I’m deeply grateful to have grown up under that influence. When I call my father a fundamentalist, I mean no disrespect whatsoever. Yet the term carries that disrespect, and at the same time, I know no other the fully reflects his beliefs.
Language changes, and is nearly impossible to turn from its course. I wonder if I should try to rescue the term “fundamentalist” so as to make it descriptive rather than pejorative, but I doubt I’d succeed. Perhaps I just need to write something like this every so often, to remind people that “fundamentalist” is not a synonym either for “terrorist” or “idiot.”
As someone who is distinctly non-fundamentalist, perhaps I’m a good person to make that statement.
-
Cameras in Public Places
There are three issues I’ve been wanting to comment on, but because I see all three as related, I’ve been looking for the right moment. I think this story, about cops caught on speed and red light cameras, gives me the right opportunity.
The three issues are:
- Videotaping (or otherwise recording) police performing their duties
- Security cameras in public places
- Red light and speeding cameras
Nobody likes to get caught by the cameras, no matter what. Civil libertarians, with whom I am usually in agreement, object to many instances of cameras as excessively invasive. Many of the same people strongly support the right of the public to record police officers carrying out their duties as well.
I take the view that when a camera is recording me in a public place, I don’t have an expectation of privacy. If you stick your camera in the window of my house, that’s something different. But if I’m walking down the street, or driving my car, and a camera catches me, I see that as no different from having an eyewitness do so. Except, of course, that the camera is likely to be more accurate. Indeed, if I was accused of a crime, and was nowhere near where it took place, I’d love to find a camera that had a clear picture of me not being where the crime took place!
Similarly, I think the more law enforcement actions are on film, the better. That way we can verify true accusations and refute false allegations more effectively. There is a complaint of poor quality video taken by citizens. Newer devices will change that somewhat, though they won’t change point of view, or get citizens to hold the device more steadily. The best response here, I think, is the one many police departments are taking–record everything.
So even though I’d rather not get caught rolling through that red light just after the yellow, I prefer the accurate record of the device, which I would trust over a human’s observation, and I also prefer the consistency.
As for the original story–officers caught by the cameras–I would suggest that if there are valid exceptions, the department needs to deal with it. The Baltimore rules sound pretty restrictive to me, but then I’m no expert. I’d like to think the officer responding to a bank robbery without his lights on (for good reason, I assume) would not be fined for speeding. If he’s in his own car on private business, or if he’s going from one place to another on routine business, then he needs to obey the law, as do I.
And whatever we’re doing in a public place, we might be seen, whether by camera or by human observer, and we should simply expect it.
(HT: Dispatches)
Related articles
- More Fights Over Red Light Cameras (reason.com)
- Cops Don’t Like Red Light Cameras Either (pixiq.com)
-
Life Application Bible Winner
… is Jay Silvas, who is also the sole qualified entry.
Despite having only this one entry, I’m happy with my plan for selecting a winner, because I think the comment itself was rather good, given the passage I selected. So congratulations to Jay. Send me your address (or I’ll request it soon), and I’ll send you the coupon for your free Bible.
-
A Couple of Links on the Purpose of the Church
A few days ago I posted a quote on the purpose of the church, particularly church growth, and between the comments to that post, Twitter, and my RSS reader, I’ve found a few to add to it.
First, Jimmy Davis, a former student (for one year of Hebrew) and now an associate pastor in Texas, provided a link to his article, When Your Church is Really Parachurch. The critical conclusion:
Organizations, much like individuals, are prone to have “me-first-hearts” rather than “you-first-hearts.” I am not saying that organization is bad or unnecessary; indeed, it is necessary and good (the first six chapters of Acts describe how the church organized itself as it grew). But the attitude of the church’s pastors, programs, polity, and place toward the church’s people should always be one of “at your service.” As I examine my own experience in the pew and the pastorate I am convinced that though Jesus has called the organization to serve the organism, I and many others have led our churches to have an “organization-first-heart.” Our churches must learn to live the cruciform life of dying to the glory and good of the organization in order to live for the glory of God and the good of people.
Jimmy has a book coming out soon, Cruciform: Living the Cross-Shaped Life which he says will be released April 1st (no foolin’!). (No, I’m not the publisher on this one!)
Pastor Steven Furtick (I’m not sure where I gleaned this from), admonishes us to be fishers of men, not keepers of the aquarium. It’s an excellent way to make the point! I have often noted how churches that concentrate on taking care of the people inside tend to diminish. Often in order to properly care for those inside you need to be looking outside.
Related articles
- A Fact You Probably Don’t Know (frankviola.wordpress.com)
- Guest Article: The New Testament is Plural Not Singular (frankviola.wordpress.com)
- Church Growth Doesn’t Mean You’re Healthy (pressingtoward.wordpress.com)
- Our Pastor is Lazy (jevlir.com)
-
Need a License to be Smart?
Apparently Kevin Lacy, chief traffic engineer for the North Carolina DOT thinks you do. When a citizens group challenged his decision on a couple of traffic lights, and provided substantiating data they collected and compiled themselves, he said it was “engineering-level work” and reported it to the state licensing board.
This one speaks for itself, I think. Incredible!
HT: Dispatches.
Related articles
- N.C. Official Sics License Police On Computer Scientist For Too Good a Complaint (yro.slashdot.org)
- MORE ON THAT “UNLICENSED ENGINEER” SCANDAL AT THE NORTH CAROLINA DOT: North Carolina Transporation … (pajamasmedia.com)
- “In North Carolina sits a clown named Kevin Lacy,” and related posts (elmtreeforge.blogspot.com)
-
Hermeneutical Self-Awareness
Pete Enns has an interesting article on Cain and Abel on the BioLogos Science and the Sacred web site. As interesting as it is–and I commend the discussion–I was most struck by the final paragraph:
Pondering these sorts of questions leads to “hermeneutical self-awareness.” Such self-awareness may not lead to the final word about a passage, but it does lead to true humility in interpretation and an encouragement to unity among Christians where they might differ on matters of interpretation.
That’s an excellent phrase: hermenutical self-awareness. I think we are often much too little aware of how it is we come to particular interpretations. One valuable way to build such awareness is by looking at a variety of attempts to interpret a passage, as Enns does in this post.
-
Nice Note on the Johannine Comma
This article by Daniel B. Wallace includes some nice material about how the groundwork for textual criticism is done.
-
Life Application Study Bible (NLT) Giveaway
I have had this on my Participatory Bible Study blog for a few days and so far there is only one entry. Contest ends Monday. Check it out!






