Headline Bias
While I’m at talking about the auto industry, how about the following headline from MNSBC.com:
Republicans to Detroit: Drop dead
Biased? Read the article yourself and see if that’s what the Republicans in question were saying.
While I’m at talking about the auto industry, how about the following headline from MNSBC.com:
Biased? Read the article yourself and see if that’s what the Republicans in question were saying.
I think the Nevada Supreme Court got this one right. Freedom of the press must include full freedom to invite or not to invite. I often support candidates with very low ratings at the polls, but there is no legal basis to force their inclusion in any televised debate.
It’s available here. This is for all you other people like me who prefer to read something that long.
. . . but on target. I refer to this post on Pursuing Holiness. My own preference is that churches and religious organizations define marriage for their own constituents, and the state simply define households. Laura’s words about free speech destroying human rights committees are also on target.
In pursuing the laudable goal of keeping lead out of children’s it looks like congress may have been just as thoughtful as usual. More on evangelical outpost.
I commented before on how we’re getting snippets out of context. Peter Kirk has done some looking regarding the God damn America comment. From another angle, my wife thinks Obama needs to say “enough!” and get on with the campaign.
Here’s a conspiracy I could get on board with!
Bias in the media? Media bias against Republicans? That’s a trick question, right?
I don’t care if it is biased – the republicans are right on this one and they should stand by what they are saying.