Headline Bias
While I’m at talking about the auto industry, how about the following headline from MNSBC.com:
Republicans to Detroit: Drop dead
Biased? Read the article yourself and see if that’s what the Republicans in question were saying.
While I’m at talking about the auto industry, how about the following headline from MNSBC.com:
Biased? Read the article yourself and see if that’s what the Republicans in question were saying.
Uses social media. Receives request for help. Personally shovels driveway. Kudos! More on CNN (HT: Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire).
. . . at Diary of 1.
David Ker has taken on the world at ThinkChristian.net, or so it probably seems to him. The comments provide some additional links and some vigorous comment.
One characteristic of creationist debate over the last few decades has been moving the goal posts. Every time a new fossil is discovered that fits into the evolutionary pattern for some lineage we hear the “it’s still an X” litany, followed by pointing to yet more gaps. Each new fossil, it seems, creates new gaps…
Darrell Pursiful at Dr. Platypus is requesting short definitions from those who accept or use the language of inerrancy in describing the Bible. Shorter, definitely, than the Chicago statement. Though I don’t qualify, even though my definition of inspiration has been called inerrancy, I thought I’d pass this on.
Are dogs smarter than cats?
Bias in the media? Media bias against Republicans? That’s a trick question, right?
I don’t care if it is biased – the republicans are right on this one and they should stand by what they are saying.