<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Education and Forced Labor or Public Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://henrysthreads.com/2008/11/education-and-forced-labor-or-public-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://henrysthreads.com/2008/11/education-and-forced-labor-or-public-service/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Religion in the World from a passionate, moderate, liberal charismatic Christian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.A. Ridgely</title>
		<link>http://henrysthreads.com/2008/11/education-and-forced-labor-or-public-service/comment-page-1/#comment-128319</link>
		<dc:creator>D.A. Ridgely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=1668#comment-128319</guid>
		<description>I assure you that I did nothing but cut and paste the quote shown at our blog verbatim from the Change.gov site.  

I won&#039;t flatter myself into believing our criticism in particular was even noticed, let alone caused any revision or reconsideration, but it it at least nice to see that the incoming administration is capable of refining it&#039;s message.  We shall have to wait and see now whether not only the message but, more importantly, the actual intent has been modified, too.

That said, while I certainly have fewer objections to the revised language, I would still find the revised proposal objectionable for reasons discussed in the comments section of the post you linked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assure you that I did nothing but cut and paste the quote shown at our blog verbatim from the Change.gov site.  </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t flatter myself into believing our criticism in particular was even noticed, let alone caused any revision or reconsideration, but it it at least nice to see that the incoming administration is capable of refining it&#8217;s message.  We shall have to wait and see now whether not only the message but, more importantly, the actual intent has been modified, too.</p>
<p>That said, while I certainly have fewer objections to the revised language, I would still find the revised proposal objectionable for reasons discussed in the comments section of the post you linked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

