One other note. I have found that people tend to see Evolution as the corner stone of Geocreationism. Perhaps it will be eventually, but I didn’t even start investigating evolution itself until I had mapped all 6 days to actual recorded events. But then, I needed to investigate Evolution more thoruoghly before writing about 6. My own first step (which is in my Study Outline page (http://www.geocreationism.com/study-outline/) ) was to establish that Jesus was in fact present at Creation, and gave Moses an account of what happened. The next step was to combine the 4 accounts of creation that I found in scripture. The 3rd step was to establish scientifically the conditions that are very well described by Genesis 1.

I appreciate the feedback, whether it be on your blog or mine. I am willing to change some of my viewpoints if they are shown not to work. It is more the intention that matters to me. For example, I am trying to forge a theory that has God present. It would seem that you agree with that intent, even if you disagree with the solution. If therefore it turns out you are correct (remove God and the laws stop working), then I would have no problem with that. At this point however, I am not convinced.

In regards to terminology, that’s a tough one for me, because any use of common terminology will conflict with at least someone’s notion of what that terminology means. “Theistic Evolution” is one such term. I always risk being misunderstand when I use it.

Also, you are correct that the “harmony” I see has required some compromise in both science and scriptural interpretation. The scientific compromise is primarily in my embracing somewhat recent (1999 to 2001) research into how zircon crystals formed 4.4 billion years ago. I say it’s a compromise because it hasn’t been embraced yet to my knowledge, and the fact that it establishes Day 1 to me is my proof that it’s correct. Secular scientists would never say that. The compromises I’ve made in scriptural interpretation, well, they will certainly be evident as you read them, but my intention is to embrace them as history.

Finally, I think you might perceive an inconsistancy in my view, in regards to God’s continual presence. In some posts I say that God only acts during the “days” and not the nights. In other places, I say He is present during the entire thing. The inconsistancy comes from my view that the Father and Son have different creative roles, and sometimes I refer to them by name and other times I just say God.

Anyways, I look forward to seeing what you think.