Comments on: Theisms, Creationisms, and Evolutionisms: An Exercise in Definition

By: Threads from Henry’s Web » Blog Archive » Honourable Mention for Threads and Stuff to Read

Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:28:05 +0000

[...] I use the honourable spelling for honourable in honour of Canadian connections. He links to my post Theisms, Creationisms, and Evolutionisms: An Exercise in Definition. I appreciate the mention and [...]

By: Martin LaBar

Martin LaBar — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:59:46 +0000

You may be interested in this post, where I quote from both Behe and Dembski (also from Johnson) on some of what they believe that does not agree with Young-Earth Creationism.

By: Henry Neufeld

Henry Neufeld — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:54:08 +0000

I’m glad to hear those particular points, but I was in no way intending a general response to Telic Thoughts as a blog, but rather simply commenting on the specific issue of how ID is labeled. I quoted the Telic Thoughts post particularly because of the classification of Michael Behe’s view.

By: macht

macht — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:20:06 +0000

If you read more on Telic Thoughts, you’ll find that we’ve distinguished between ID creationists and ID evolutionists. ID Creationist is accurate for some ID proponents but not for others. I would label Behe an ID evolutionist.

Also, most of the contributers to Telic Thoughts (and MikeGene, for sure) don’t think ID is science (or, they think it is bad science). Nor do most of us (perhaps none of us, I can’t remember) think it should be taught in schools.