<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doctrine and Reality &#8211; The Need for Balance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://henrysthreads.com/2007/05/doctrine-and-reality-the-need-for-balance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://henrysthreads.com/2007/05/doctrine-and-reality-the-need-for-balance/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Religion in the World from a passionate, moderate, liberal charismatic Christian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri Tippins</title>
		<link>http://henrysthreads.com/2007/05/doctrine-and-reality-the-need-for-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-41236</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri Tippins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=703#comment-41236</guid>
		<description>We must always remember that (all) authority has been given to Jesus.  A person with a healthy intelligence and the abilty to reason most often will question things.  This is not a defect or a flaw but is actually a survival tactic.  I have been in the postition where I have questioned a teacher&#039;s interpretation........it was&#039;nt pretty.  Most people in positions of leadership will never admit to error or of the possibilty that they could be wrong in thier interpretation and most hearers expect perfection from those that are called to lead them.  What I am saying is they give men to much authority and then impose  God like expectations from them.  Most leaders are willing to step into this position but trying to maintain it is another thing altogether.   We represent Jesus, we are to be a reflection of Him to others. But, we must always remember we have only a partial knowledge at best, we don&#039;t know it all.  We see through a glass dimly, we don&#039;t see everything clearly either.  We don&#039;t know everything, so let&#039;s not pretend that we always do.  Honesty is still the policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must always remember that (all) authority has been given to Jesus.  A person with a healthy intelligence and the abilty to reason most often will question things.  This is not a defect or a flaw but is actually a survival tactic.  I have been in the postition where I have questioned a teacher&#8217;s interpretation&#8230;&#8230;..it was&#8217;nt pretty.  Most people in positions of leadership will never admit to error or of the possibilty that they could be wrong in thier interpretation and most hearers expect perfection from those that are called to lead them.  What I am saying is they give men to much authority and then impose  God like expectations from them.  Most leaders are willing to step into this position but trying to maintain it is another thing altogether.   We represent Jesus, we are to be a reflection of Him to others. But, we must always remember we have only a partial knowledge at best, we don&#8217;t know it all.  We see through a glass dimly, we don&#8217;t see everything clearly either.  We don&#8217;t know everything, so let&#8217;s not pretend that we always do.  Honesty is still the policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Participatory Bible Study Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Information on FV (Federal Vision)</title>
		<link>http://henrysthreads.com/2007/05/doctrine-and-reality-the-need-for-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-40639</link>
		<dc:creator>Participatory Bible Study Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Information on FV (Federal Vision)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=703#comment-40639</guid>
		<description>[...] found the this post on the Federal Vision (FV) because the author tracked back to a post on my Threads blog that is related to my Look at New Perspectives on Paul entry. It&#8217;s not my intent to discuss [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found the this post on the Federal Vision (FV) because the author tracked back to a post on my Threads blog that is related to my Look at New Perspectives on Paul entry. It&#8217;s not my intent to discuss [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Horne &#187; links for 2007-05-03</title>
		<link>http://henrysthreads.com/2007/05/doctrine-and-reality-the-need-for-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-40551</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Horne &#187; links for 2007-05-03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=703#comment-40551</guid>
		<description>[...] Doctrine and Reality - The Need for Balance &#8220;The question I have is whether you can say that a certain set of standards is not elevated above scripture, and at the same time make the assumption that those standards define what scripture says&#8221; (tags: fv/npp-smear) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doctrine and Reality &#8211; The Need for Balance &#8220;The question I have is whether you can say that a certain set of standards is not elevated above scripture, and at the same time make the assumption that those standards define what scripture says&#8221; (tags: fv/npp-smear) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://henrysthreads.com/2007/05/doctrine-and-reality-the-need-for-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-40411</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 16:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=703#comment-40411</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It is clear from scripture that good teaching is a good thing. In other words, it does matter what we teach. At the same time it’s very easy to make our doctrine, especially detailed doctrinal issues into something that stands instead of God.</i></p>
<p>Amen.</p>
<p>The priest in the movie <i>Rudy</i> says at one point that he has come up with two incontrovertible truths: &#8220;There is a God. And I&#8217;m not Him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Truth number three: Our words and images are not God either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

