http://henrysthreads.com/2006/03/dating-the-book-of-daniel/ Thoughts on Religion in the World from a passionate, moderate, liberal charismatic Christian Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:11:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://henrysthreads.com/2006/03/dating-the-book-of-daniel/comment-page-1/#comment-6154 Participatory Bible Study Blog » Blog Archive » Biblical Criticism Resources Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:09:33 +0000 http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=114#comment-6154 [...] Dating the Book of DanielNot strictly part of the series, but an example of dealing with a problem. [...] [...] Dating the Book of DanielNot strictly part of the series, but an example of dealing with a problem. [...]

]]> http://henrysthreads.com/2006/03/dating-the-book-of-daniel/comment-page-1/#comment-4437 A Story of Three Prophets - Participatory Bible Study Blog Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:01:37 +0000 http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=114#comment-4437 [...] One element of God’s method of revealing himself to people is that he chooses specific people to accomplish specific missions. I want to look at the time of the exile, and three of God’s messengers, Jeremiah, Daniel, and Ezekiel. Now there will be those who accept a later date for Daniel and will question my using him in this part of the story. Let me simply state that I do believe that the stories of Daniel, though not likely the entire book, date from the time of the exile,were later written down and collected in what we now have as the Aramaic portions of Daniel. For more discussion see Dating the Book of Daniel. [...] [...] One element of God’s method of revealing himself to people is that he chooses specific people to accomplish specific missions. I want to look at the time of the exile, and three of God’s messengers, Jeremiah, Daniel, and Ezekiel. Now there will be those who accept a later date for Daniel and will question my using him in this part of the story. Let me simply state that I do believe that the stories of Daniel, though not likely the entire book, date from the time of the exile,were later written down and collected in what we now have as the Aramaic portions of Daniel. For more discussion see Dating the Book of Daniel. [...]

]]> http://henrysthreads.com/2006/03/dating-the-book-of-daniel/comment-page-1/#comment-347 Threads from Henry’s Web » Blog Archive » Ernest Lucas on Daniel Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:17:27 +0000 http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=114#comment-347 [...] In an earlier post, Dating the Book of Daniel, I mentioned that I had ordered Ernest Lucas’s volume on Daniel in the Apollos Old Testament Commentary series. I now have received, read, and returned that volume, and I thought I would post a few notes. [...] [...] In an earlier post, Dating the Book of Daniel, I mentioned that I had ordered Ernest Lucas’s volume on Daniel in the Apollos Old Testament Commentary series. I now have received, read, and returned that volume, and I thought I would post a few notes. [...]

]]> http://henrysthreads.com/2006/03/dating-the-book-of-daniel/comment-page-1/#comment-189 Threads from Henry’s Web » Blog Archive » Genre and Canonical Criticism Sun, 02 Apr 2006 17:11:11 +0000 http://www.energionpubs.com/wordpress/?p=114#comment-189 [...] Recently I’ve been doing some study of the book of Daniel, in which genre criticism can be extremely important. Previously, I discussed the dating of Daniel, particularly from the point of view of Anthony Di Lella, author of the Anchor Bible commentary on the book. Di Lella believes that the book is pseudonymous, written in the 2nd century BCE, and also that its stories are not generally historical, but rather are edifying stories. (See Dating the Book of Daniel.) At the same time he maintains that this view does not conflict with inerrancy. How does he do that? [...] [...] Recently I’ve been doing some study of the book of Daniel, in which genre criticism can be extremely important. Previously, I discussed the dating of Daniel, particularly from the point of view of Anthony Di Lella, author of the Anchor Bible commentary on the book. Di Lella believes that the book is pseudonymous, written in the 2nd century BCE, and also that its stories are not generally historical, but rather are edifying stories. (See Dating the Book of Daniel.) At the same time he maintains that this view does not conflict with inerrancy. How does he do that? [...]

]]>